Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
1,091 results · page 1 of 22
Oct 28, 2026HTTP::Body versions before 1.23_01 for Perl drop mixed-case percent escapes from urlencoded form fields instead of decoding them.CVE-2026-116135 · Other software · reported by 9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e
HTTP::Body versions before 1.23_01 for Perl drop mixed-case percent escapes from urlencoded form fields instead of decoding them. The decode table holds only the all-lowercase and all-uppercase spelling of each hex pair, while the escape pattern matches either case. An escape such as %aB finds no entry and is replaced with nothing, joining the bytes on either side. Hex digits in percent escapes are case-insensitive, and conforming decoders return the byte. A remote attacker can send a field name or value that a conforming decoder in front of the application reads differently, so that pass%aBword reaches the application as password.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.commetacpan.org
Oct 28, 2026HTTP::Body versions before 1.23_01 for Perl allow memory and temporary file exhaustion via an unlimited number of form fields and multipart parts.CVE-2026-116131 · Other software · reported by 9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441e
HTTP::Body versions before 1.23_01 for Perl allow memory and temporary file exhaustion via an unlimited number of form fields and multipart parts. The urlencoded parser splits the whole body on its separators at once, creating one scalar per separator before any field is stored. This costs about 90 bytes of memory per separator byte. The multipart parser creates a temporary file for every part that carries a filename. Neither parser limits how many fields or parts a body may hold. A remote attacker can exhaust worker memory with a body made of separators, or create thousands of temporary files with one request of small file parts.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.commetacpan.org
Oct 28, 2026A user with permission to edit contact points but not their protected fields can change protected settings, such as a contact point's destination URL, by switchCVE-2026-100105 · Other software · Grafana · reported by security@grafana.comHigh 7.7
A user with permission to edit contact points but not their protected fields can change protected settings, such as a contact point's destination URL, by switching an integration to a legacy schema version, which can expose stored credentials and redirect alert notifications (incorrect authorization).
- Product
- Grafana Enterprise
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 28, 2026The che-machine-exec service constructs a shell command by concatenating user-controlled input (the username and namespace fields from the /exec/init and /exec/CVE-2026-114278 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgCritical 9.8
The che-machine-exec service constructs a shell command by concatenating user-controlled input (the username and namespace fields from the /exec/init and /exec/config JSON endpoints) into a double-quoted sh -c "echo "..." > ..." invocation without any escaping. When che-machine-exec is run with authentication disabled (its default), any network-reachable attacker can achieve remote code execution in containers che-machine-exec is configured to access, via shell command substitution ($(...) or backticks).
- Product
- Eclipse Che
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comgitlab.eclipse.org
Oct 28, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/histograms: Reject non-stacktrace fields for synthetic stacktrace fields In check_CVE-2026-99163 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: tracing/histograms: Reject non-stacktrace fields for synthetic stacktrace fields In check_synth_field(), when a synthetic event field is a stacktrace (field->is_stack) and the histogram field is not a "long[" stacktrace array, validation falls through to the generic size and signedness comparison. Because parse_synth_field() sets a stacktrace field's type to "__data_loc unsigned long[]", its size is sizeof(u64) and synth_field_signed() marks it as signed. Consequently, any 8-byte signed scalar histogram field passes the fallback check, and its scalar value is subsequently dereferenced as a kernel stacktrace pointer in get_field_size() and trace_stack(). Furthermore, checking strstr(hist_field->type, "long[") is insufficient because tracepoint fields defined with __bitmask() or __rel_bitmask() also have type "__data_loc unsigned long[]" or "__rel_loc unsigned long[]", whilst create_hist_field() treats them as 4-byte scalar values without HIST_FIELD_FL_STACKTRACE. Propagate HIST_FIELD_FL_STACKTRACE to variable references and field variables (whilst excluding variable aliases from per-element stacktrace capture)
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 28, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended: Unauthorized access of data and triggering of server-side actionsCVE-2026-2839 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.3
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to unauthorized access of data and triggering of server-side actions in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.7. This is due to multiple AJAX handlers registered for unauthenticated users (`wp_ajax_nopriv_*`) that fail to implement proper `current_user_can()` authorization checks. While these handlers use ACF's `acf_verify_ajax()` function to validate cryptographic nonces, the `acf_nonce` values are generated for guest users and publicly exposed in the page source of any frontend page utilizing an ACF form. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to extract the guest nonce and bypass WordPress visibility permissions, leading to the unauthorized disclosure of post titles and internal Flexible Content layout structures. The vulnerability was partially patched in version 0.9.2.4.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended
- Affected
- up to 0.9.2.7
- What to do
- Affects up to 0.9.2.7. Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 28, 2026Product Addons for Woocommerce – Product Options with Custom Fields: Stored Cross-Site ScriptingCVE-2026-109988 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.4
The Product Addons for Woocommerce – Product Options with Custom Fields plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via the 'fields[section][fields][row][col][type]' parameter in all versions up to, and including, 3.1.8 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with shop manager-level access and above, to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page.
- Product
- Product Addons for Woocommerce – Product Options with Custom Fields
- Affected
- up to 3.1.8
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.1.8. Update Product Addons for Woocommerce – Product Options with Custom Fields to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 27, 2026ProtobufParser parses length-prefixed protobuf string and bytes fields by checking (_inputPtr + len) <= _inputEnd and then, on the fast path, calling _finishShoCVE-2026-104016 · Other software · FasterXML · reported by 36c7be3b-2937-45df-85ea-ca7133ea542cHigh 7.5
ProtobufParser parses length-prefixed protobuf string and bytes fields by checking (_inputPtr + len) <= _inputEnd and then, on the fast path, calling _finishShortText(len). Both use 32-bit signed integer arithmetic. When an attacker supplies a varint decoding to a length near Integer.MAX_VALUE, _inputPtr + len overflows to a negative value, the bounds check passes, and _finishShortText(len) reaches TextBuffer.expandCurrentSegment(len), which performs Arrays.copyOf with no cap and throws OutOfMemoryError: Requested array size exceeds VM limit. The JVM refuses arrays larger than Integer.MAX_VALUE - 8 before consulting available heap, so -Xmx tuning does not mitigate the issue. StreamReadConstraints.maxStringLength and maxDocumentLength do not gate this path: a 33-byte payload is far below any document-length cap and the string-length check does not fire before the allocation. This was confirmed empirically against shipping artifacts with maxStringLength, maxDocumentLength and maxNestingDepth all configured. A February 2026 hardening commit added the equivalent overflow guard to the packed-array-length and message-length paths but left the string-length call sites unguarded. No
- Product
- jackson-dataformat-protobuf
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 27, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended: Authorization bypassCVE-2026-10752 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.8
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to authorization bypass in all versions up to, and including, 0.9.2.6. This is due to the plugin not properly verifying that a user is authorized to perform an action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete arbitrary WordPress media library attachments by supplying a numeric attachment ID in the form submission without any ownership or capability verification. Exploitation requires a site administrator to have configured a public-facing ACFE form with an Email action whose attachment row uses a dynamic {field:...} source bound to a submittable field with the Delete option enabled.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended
- Affected
- up to 0.9.2.6
- What to do
- Affects up to 0.9.2.6. Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 26, 2026The root-privileged `wsserver` terminal-bridge daemon builds a shell command from client-supplied WebSocket fields and passes it to `system()` and `popen()` witCVE-2026-65184 · Other software · Vertiv · reported by 44488dab-36db-4358-99f9-bc116477f914Critical 9.8
The root-privileged `wsserver` terminal-bridge daemon builds a shell command from client-supplied WebSocket fields and passes it to `system()` and `popen()` without quoting, escaping, or character-set validation. The daemon's public-key session path performs no appliance-session check.
- Product
- Avocent ACS8000
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordrunzero.comrunzero.com
Oct 23, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/net: populate CONNECT filter fields for 24-byte sockaddr_in6 io_connect_bpf_populCVE-2026-99042 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67High 8.4
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: io_uring/net: populate CONNECT filter fields for 24-byte sockaddr_in6 io_connect_bpf_populate() fills connect.port and connect.v6_addr for AF_INET6 only when addr_len >= sizeof(struct sockaddr_in6), i.e. 28 bytes. The IPv6 connect paths accept SIN6_LEN_RFC2133 (24 bytes), which already holds sin6_port and sin6_addr. io_connect() passes addr_len to the socket layer unchanged. At addr_len 24 the filter sees family AF_INET6 with port and address zero, while the kernel connects to the real destination. A filter that denies an IPv6 port or address is bypassed. Denying connect.port == P rejects [::1]:P with -EACCES at addr_len 28 but connects at addr_len 24. Use SIN6_LEN_RFC2133 as the threshold. sin6_scope_id stays zero when absent. The threshold mismatch was found by an AI coding assistant (Claude Code) comparing this hook against the net/ipv6 length checks on my instructions; it also drafted the reproducer and this patch. I verified the bypass and the fix in a VM on 7.3-rc6 and that 7.2 has the same code.
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 23, 2026The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended and Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugins from 0.9.2.4 to 0.9.2.7 do not consistently disable shortcode prCVE-2026-94263 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 4.8
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended and Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugins from 0.9.2.4 to 0.9.2.7 do not consistently disable shortcode processing in the confirmation message of their front-end forms, allowing unauthenticated visitors to have arbitrary shortcodes executed server-side when they submit a form whose stored configuration does not carry the relevant setting.
- What to do
- Update the plugin to the newest version.
Oct 23, 2026`jwkFields.CheckConsistency` detected duplicate `key_ops` entries with a pairwise nested loop, making validation cost grow with the **square** of the entry counCVE-2026-89314 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgMedium 6.9
`jwkFields.CheckConsistency` detected duplicate `key_ops` entries with a pairwise nested loop, making validation cost grow with the **square** of the entry count. Because the check runs on every JWK and JWKS unmarshal, a modestly sized but hostile JWKS document could occupy a CPU core for many seconds.
- Product
- Eclipse KeyPont - GOSE
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 23, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO: Does not resolve the target of the update-user action in its front-end Forms module consistently between the stage tCVE-2026-94268 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanHigh 8.1
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8 does not resolve the target of the update-user action in its front-end Forms module consistently between the stage that authorises the request and the stage that carries it out, which allows unauthenticated visitors to bypass the guard protecting administrator accounts, take over the site administrator's account and be issued a valid session for it. Exploitation requires the site to publish two separate front-end form configurations whose targets are mapped to visitor-submitted values.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO
- Fixed in
- 0.9.2.8
- What to do
- Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO to 0.9.2.8 or newer.
Oct 23, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO: Does not perform any capability checkCVE-2026-94267 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanCritical 9
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8 does not perform any capability check when updating a post through one of its front-end form actions, allowing unauthenticated visitors to overwrite arbitrary posts, including the ones in which the site stores its own field definitions, which in turn leads to arbitrary code execution on the server. Exploitation requires the site to publish a form whose post-update action maps both its target and its content to visitor-submitted values.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO
- Fixed in
- 0.9.2.8
- What to do
- Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO to 0.9.2.8 or newer.
Oct 23, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO: Does not validate or escape some of its form shortcode attributesCVE-2026-94264 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 6.8
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8 does not validate or escape some of its form shortcode attributes, which can be pointed at values taken from the visitor's own request and are then output without escaping, allowing users with a role as low as contributor to have arbitrary script run in the browser of anyone led to open a crafted link or page, including a logged-in administrator. This is an incomplete fix for CVE-2023-5292, whose deny-list covers only the three HTML wrapper attributes.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO
- Fixed in
- 0.9.2.8
- What to do
- Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO to 0.9.2.8 or newer.
Oct 23, 2026Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO: Does not verify that the requester is authorised to edit the targeted user account in the update-user action of its CVE-2026-94262 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanHigh 8.1
The Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8 does not verify that the requester is authorised to edit the targeted user account in the update-user action of its front-end Forms module, performing that check only when the target account holds an administrator role, which allows unauthenticated visitors to overwrite any non-administrator account's credentials and obtain a session for that account. Exploitation requires the site to publish a form whose user-update action maps its target to a visitor-submitted value rather than to the default current user.
- Product
- Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO
- Fixed in
- 0.9.2.8
- What to do
- Update Advanced Custom Fields: Extended WordPress plugin before 0.9.2.8, Advanced Custom Fields: Extended PRO to 0.9.2.8 or newer.
Oct 22, 2026WP Ultimate Review: Does not neutralise shortcodes in all of the review fields submitted through its public review formCVE-2026-103234 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 4.8
The WP Ultimate Review WordPress plugin before 2.4.5 does not neutralise shortcodes in all of the review fields submitted through its public review form, which is available to unauthenticated visitors, allowing them to execute arbitrary shortcodes when the affected field is displayed, provided user reviews and that field's display are enabled.
- Product
- WP Ultimate Review
- Fixed in
- 2.4.5
- What to do
- Update WP Ultimate Review to 2.4.5 or newer.
Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Flexfields).CVE-2026-101552 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comHigh 7.5
Vulnerability in the Oracle Application Object Library product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Flexfields). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Application Object Library. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Oracle Application Object Library. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).
- Product
- Oracle Application Object Library
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 20, 2026The PEAK-System PCAN type 0x4030 processing path fails to validate a selected/returned object pointer before dereferencing fixed fields during post-processing.CVE-2026-110322 · Other software · HMS Networks · reported by ics-cert@hq.dhs.govMedium 6.8
The PEAK-System PCAN type 0x4030 processing path fails to validate a selected/returned object pointer before dereferencing fixed fields during post-processing.
- Product
- PEAK-System Device Driver Setup
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 20, 2026The Web add-on's HTTP server searches the entire request packet for header fields instead of stopping at the end of the header section.CVE-2026-93003 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgMedium 6.9
The Web add-on's HTTP server searches the entire request packet for header fields instead of stopping at the end of the header section. A header field name placed in the request body is therefore reported to the server as though it were a header, which lets a client control request framing decisions it should not be able to reach.
- Product
- Eclipse ThreadX - NetX Duo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 20, 2026Meta Box – WordPress Custom Fields Framework: Missing AuthorizationCVE-2026-109700 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.5
Missing Authorization vulnerability in eLightUp Meta Box – WordPress Custom Fields Framework meta-box allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels.This issue affects Meta Box – WordPress Custom Fields Framework: from n/a through 5.15.2.
- Product
- Meta Box – WordPress Custom Fields Framework
- Affected
- up to 5.15.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 5.15.2. Update Meta Box – WordPress Custom Fields Framework to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Oct 19, 2026IBM MQ could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of RFH2 message header fields in queued publish/subscribe oCVE-2026-12343 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 6.5
IBM MQ could allow an authenticated attacker to cause a denial of service due to improper validation of RFH2 message header fields in queued publish/subscribe operations.
- Product
- MQ Operator
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 19, 2026SQL injection via identifier injection in the tableName and tableFields POST parameters of admin AJAX endpoints (admin/AJAX_lookup_handler.php, admin/AJAX_checkCVE-2026-107081 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.8
SQL injection via identifier injection in the tableName and tableFields POST parameters of admin AJAX endpoints (admin/AJAX_lookup_handler.php, admin/AJAX_check_id.php, admin/AJAX_vocabolary_control.php) in SENAYAN Library Management System (SLiMS) Bulian 9.8.0 allows any authenticated staff user to extract arbitrary database contents.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 18, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded Leave control.erCVE-2026-98714 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: KVM: SVM: Update control fields on #VMEXIT if and only if VMRUN succeeded Leave control.erap_ctl and control.clean as-is in the VMCS if VMRUN fails, because as per AMD: there's no explicit architectural guarantee about the behavior in the presence of VMRUN failures. So the best thing to do would be to assume that if VMRUN fails, the actions requested in the control fields may not have been performed.
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 18, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: split cifsFileInfo bitfields to avoid shared-byte RMW races The invalidHandleCVE-2026-98681 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: smb: client: split cifsFileInfo bitfields to avoid shared-byte RMW races The invalidHandle, swapfile, oplock_break_cancelled, offload, and status_file_deleted fields are stored in the same bitfield byte in struct cifsFileInfo, but are updated in different code paths that may run simultaneously, and are protected by different locks. Since bitfield assignments generate byte-level read-modify-write operations, a modification to one flag can overwrite a concurrent modification to another flag. To avoid these races, convert these flags from a bitfield to separate bool fields.
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 18, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check params size before reading reserved fields bpf_crypto_ctx_create() is a kfunc wCVE-2026-98611 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: bpf: Check params size before reading reserved fields bpf_crypto_ctx_create() is a kfunc whose second argument is declared with the __sz annotation, so the verifier only guarantees that params__sz bytes of params are valid. The function nevertheless reads params->reserved[0] and params->reserved[1] (offsets 14 and 15) before comparing params__sz against the size of struct bpf_crypto_params, so a BPF program can pass a shorter buffer and have the kernel read past the region that was validated for it. Move the size check in front of the reserved field reads.
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 18, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/core: Fill branch entries with a single assignment perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields(CVE-2026-98551 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: perf/core: Fill branch entries with a single assignment perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields() clears the bitfields of struct perf_branch_entry one by one and leaves from/to alone, since callers overwrite those straight away. The list has to be kept in sync with the struct by hand and has already fallen behind: new_type and priv were added to perf_branch_entry and never added here. Only BRBE writes those two, and neither for every record. brbe_set_perf_entry_type() leaves new_type alone for a branch type it does not recognise, and priv is not set for source-only records. arm_pmuv3.c allocates the per-CPU branch stack with kmalloc(), so such a record reaches userspace with whatever the slot held: uninitialised kmalloc() data on the first pass over the buffer, the previous record's values after that. Nothing under arch/x86/events/ writes either field, so only arm64 is affected. Assign the whole entry at each site instead. Everything not named is then zero, and there is no list to keep in sync. The bitfields add up to exactly 64 bits, so the struct has no padding to leave undefined. perf_clear_branch_entry_bitfields
- Product
- Linux
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgit.kernel.orggit.kernel.org
Oct 16, 2026Text::CSV_XS versions before 1.65 for Perl leak the parsed fields of a record that fails to parse in getline.CVE-2026-110754 · Other software · reported by 9b29abf9-4ab0-4765-b253-1875cd9b441eMedium 6.5
Text::CSV_XS versions before 1.65 for Perl leak the parsed fields of a record that fails to parse in getline. getline collects the fields of a record into a new array and returns a reference to it only when the parse succeeds. When the record has a syntax error, getline returns undef and never frees the array or the fields parsed before the error. A long-running process parsing untrusted CSV retains every malformed record it is sent, so repeated malformed input exhausts its memory.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.commetacpan.org
Oct 16, 2026AipexBase through commit 690adb9 contains a sql injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject SQL through the order_by and group_by fields of the /apiCVE-2026-111718 · Other software · kuafuai · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
AipexBase through commit 690adb9 contains a sql injection vulnerability that allows attackers to inject SQL through the order_by and group_by fields of the /api/data/invoke endpoint. Attackers can supply subqueries or EXTRACTVALUE and UPDATEXML functions that bypass the SqlGuard denylist and row-level security, reading other users' rows and tables.
- Product
- aipexbase
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 15, 2026unarr through 1.1.1 contains a heap-based out-of-bounds read in zip_parse_extra_fields() in zip/parse-zip.c due to an incorrect ZIP64 extra field length check.CVE-2026-111274 · Other software · selmf · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.8
unarr through 1.1.1 contains a heap-based out-of-bounds read in zip_parse_extra_fields() in zip/parse-zip.c due to an incorrect ZIP64 extra field length check. Attackers can supply a crafted ZIP archive with 0xFFFFFFFF sentinel values and a truncated ZIP64 record to read past the heap buffer and crash the process.
- Product
- unarr
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 15, 2026@casl/ability 6.7.5 before 7.0.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in rulesToFields() that allows attackers to modify inherited builtins via dotted cCVE-2026-111172 · Other software · stalniy · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6
@casl/ability 6.7.5 before 7.0.2 contains a prototype pollution vulnerability in rulesToFields() that allows attackers to modify inherited builtins via dotted condition keys. Attackers controlling rule conditions can supply keys like 'toString.call' to alter shared builtin functions process-wide, causing denial of service for the Node.js process.
- Product
- @casl/ability
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 15, 2026In Progress® Kendo® UI for jQuery prior to v2026.3.1015, the Menu component constructs HTML attributes from bound dataSource fields by string concatenation withCVE-2026-106149 · Other software · Progress Software · reported by security@progress.comMedium 5.4
In Progress® Kendo® UI for jQuery prior to v2026.3.1015, the Menu component constructs HTML attributes from bound dataSource fields by string concatenation without proper neutralization. An attacker with low privileges who can control these fields can inject JavaScript event-handler attributes that execute when a user interacts with the affected Menu, compromising the confidentiality and integrity of data accessible in the user's browser context.
- Product
- Kendo UI for jQuery
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 14, 2026pypdftk through 0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in fill_form(), dump_data_fields(), and pdftk_cmd_util() that builds shell commands from callCVE-2026-110636 · Other software · revolunet · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
pypdftk through 0.5 contains an OS command injection vulnerability in fill_form(), dump_data_fields(), and pdftk_cmd_util() that builds shell commands from caller-supplied paths. Attackers controlling pdf_path or out_file can inject shell metacharacters interpreted by subprocess.Popen with shell=True to execute OS commands as the Python process.
- Product
- pypdftk
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 13, 2026Affected devices do not properly sanitize comment fields contained in imported trace files before rendering them on the Trace page.CVE-2026-63353 · Other software · Siemens · reported by productcert@siemens.comCritical 9.4
Affected devices do not properly sanitize comment fields contained in imported trace files before rendering them on the Trace page. This could allow an attacker to social engineer an authorized user who holds the function right “Read diagnostics” into importing a specially crafted trace file. Successful exploitation could allow attacker-controlled JavaScript to execute in the user’s browser session and perform PLC operations through the web server within the scope of the user’s authorization.
- Product
- SIMATIC Drive Controller CPU 1504D TF
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcert-portal.siemens.com
Oct 12, 2026SAP NetWeaver and SAP Web Dispatcher do not properly validate certain fields in specially crafted requests handled by an internal protocol component.CVE-2026-58249 · Network & remote access · SAP_SE · reported by cna@sap.comHigh 7.5
SAP NetWeaver and SAP Web Dispatcher do not properly validate certain fields in specially crafted requests handled by an internal protocol component. An unauthenticated attacker could send a malicious request that triggers a memory-handling error, causing the affected process to crash. Successful exploitation can therefore result in a high impact on the availability of the affected application. There is no impact on the confidentiality or integrity of the application.
- Product
- SAP NetWeaver and SAP Web Dispatcher (Internet Communication Manager)
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 12, 2026Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.0 and 16.x before 16.31.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because record fields are rendered into an HTML attrCVE-2026-109653 · Other software · frappe · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.5
Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.0 and 16.x before 16.31.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability because record fields are rendered into an HTML attribute context without escaping. A low-privilege user can store a malicious payload in a record field that executes in the browser of any privileged user who opens the affected page, enabling account takeover.
- Product
- erpnext
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.1 and 16.x before 16.32.0 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability because user-controlled message fields are not vaCVE-2026-109652 · Other software · frappe · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Frappe ERPNext before 15.119.1 and 16.x before 16.32.0 contains a server-side template injection vulnerability because user-controlled message fields are not validated before template rendering, allowing expressions to run in an unrestricted context. Authenticated attackers holding a common operational role can inject template expressions to read and write arbitrary database data, delete documents, send outbound requests from the server, and send mail from the site.
- Product
- erpnext
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026LibreNMS before 26.9.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in get_oxidized_nodes_list() that renders Oxidized API fields and SNMP sysName unescCVE-2026-109355 · Other software · librenms · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
LibreNMS before 26.9.0 contains a stored cross-site scripting vulnerability in get_oxidized_nodes_list() that renders Oxidized API fields and SNMP sysName unescaped. Attackers controlling the Oxidized response or a device's SNMP sysName can inject script that executes in browsers of users viewing the Tools Oxidized page.
- Product
- librenms
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026SurrealDB before 3.3.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows callers with table-level write permission to read SELECT-restricted fields by CVE-2026-109341 · Other software · surrealdb · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
SurrealDB before 3.3.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows callers with table-level write permission to read SELECT-restricted fields by resolving JSON Patch pointers against the unreduced record. Attackers can use PATCH copy or move operations to copy hidden fields into readable destinations, or abuse test mismatch errors as a disclosure oracle.
- Product
- surrealdb
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026SurrealDB before 3.3.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows record users to read fields hidden by field-level SELECT permissions through LCVE-2026-109336 · Other software · surrealdb · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
SurrealDB before 3.3.0 contains an authorization bypass vulnerability that allows record users to read fields hidden by field-level SELECT permissions through LIVE SELECT projections. Attackers can project restricted fields from the unreduced $after or $before parameters under an alias to receive exact stored values in CREATE, UPDATE, and DELETE notifications.
- Product
- surrealdb
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026Parse Server before 8.6.93 and 9.0.0 before 9.10.1-alpha.13 does not enforce identity-scoped protectedFields (authenticated, role, or per-user groups) on count CVE-2026-109303 · Other software · parse-community · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Parse Server before 8.6.93 and 9.0.0 before 9.10.1-alpha.13 does not enforce identity-scoped protectedFields (authenticated, role, or per-user groups) on count queries using the $relatedTo operator, exposing the size of protected Relation fields. An authenticated user who can read the owning object can combine counts with an objectId constraint as a membership oracle to reveal confidential memberships such as private groups or block lists.
- Product
- parse-server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 12, 2026jshERP through 3.6 contains a mass assignment vulnerability in the UserController update handler that allows authenticated users to overwrite protected fields iCVE-2026-109186 · Other software · jishenghua · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
jshERP through 3.6 contains a mass assignment vulnerability in the UserController update handler that allows authenticated users to overwrite protected fields including tenant_id and password. Attackers can send a crafted PUT /user/update body to switch into another tenant on next login or overwrite other users' password hashes for account takeover.
- Product
- jshERP
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 12, 2026TDuck survey form through 6.0 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to add fields to other users' forms via POST /user/CVE-2026-109165 · Other software · TDuckCloud · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
TDuck survey form through 6.0 contains a broken access control vulnerability that allows authenticated users to add fields to other users' forms via POST /user/form/item/batch/create. Attackers can submit an array whose first element references their own form and later elements reference a victim's formKey, injecting attacker-chosen fields onto the victim's public fill page.
- Product
- tduck-survey-form
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 11, 2026Several Postiz endpoints return the complete database row of the record they operate on instead of only the fields the client needs.CVE-2026-107761 · Other software · GitroomHQ · reported by 4cdc9741-f887-419a-a2fd-acbbd2729276Medium 5.3
Several Postiz endpoints return the complete database row of the record they operate on instead of only the fields the client needs. Two of them include secrets the caller is not meant to receive. The public API's channel delete returns the deleted integration row, including the channel's platform access token and refresh token. A third-party OAuth app permitted to delete a channel therefore receives that channel's social platform credentials and can use them against the connected account directly, outside Postiz. `GET /user/organizations` returns each organization row, including its API key, to every member of the organization. The API key is intended for admins only, so a member with a lower role can obtain it and call the public API on behalf of the organization. Both endpoints require a valid session, API key or OAuth token and are scoped to the caller's own organization. There is no anonymous access and no cross-tenant exposure.
- Product
- postiz-app
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgadvisory.orggithub.com
Oct 10, 2026PPOM – Product Addons & Custom Fields for WooCommerce: Arbitrary file deletionCVE-2026-104801 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceCritical 9.1
The PPOM – Product Addons & Custom Fields for WooCommerce plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary file deletion due to insufficient file path validation in the rename_files function in all versions up to, and including, 34.0.10 This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to delete arbitrary files on the server, which can easily lead to remote code execution when the right file is deleted (such as wp-config.php). The relocated file is moved byte-identically into the publicly accessible wp-content/uploads/ppom_files/confirmed/ directory, meaning the attack also results in arbitrary file read for any web-readable file on the server.
- Product
- PPOM – Product Addons & Custom Fields for WooCommerce
- Affected
- up to 34.0.10
- What to do
- Affects up to 34.0.10. Update PPOM – Product Addons & Custom Fields for WooCommerce to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 10, 2026Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection): Arbitrary File UploadCVE-2026-94589 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceCritical 9.8
The Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.5 via the extcf7_submit function. This is due to missing file extension, MIME type, and size validation in the signature field's validation_filter(), combined with the absence of PHP-execution guards in the upload directory and a sanitize_file_name() bypass that converts shell.php- into shell.php. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible.
- Product
- Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection)
- Affected
- up to 3.4.5
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.4.5. Update Extensions For CF7 (Contact form 7 Database, Conditional Fields and Redirection) to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 8, 2026Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the decoding of message header fields in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticatedCVE-2026-107580 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 6.5
Inefficient algorithmic complexity in the decoding of message header fields in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.5 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to make the IMAP, SMTP and POP3 services, or the webmail, unavailable by sending a message. The server unfolded a decoded header value by finding each line break from the end of the value and removing it, moving the rest of the value each time, so its work grew with the square of the number of line breaks, and an RFC 2047 encoded word may decode to any number of them. A received message whose Subject or other header field holds such a value keeps a worker thread busy for minutes or longer each time the value is read: when the recipient's IMAP client searches, sorts or threads the folder by a header, when the webmail lists the folder, and, where configured, when a rule tests a header, a spam tag is added to the Subject or an abuse report is read during delivery. The IMAP worker threads are shared with SMTP and POP3, so a few such messages stop those services responding. The server's reading of a message header from its file also searched everything read so far after each 4,000 bytes, costing seconds for a header of
- Product
- hMailServer
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 7, 2026Authenticated users are able to manipulate both the SMTP envelope “Envelope-from” and “From” fields when sending emails through OVH mail servers.CVE-2026-33586 · Other software · OVHcloud · reported by a6d3dc9e-0591-4a13-bce7-0f5b31ff6158Medium 6.3
Authenticated users are able to manipulate both the SMTP envelope “Envelope-from” and “From” fields when sending emails through OVH mail servers. Due to OVH's default SPF configuration, which commonly includes include:mx.ovh.com, any authenticated user with a valid OVH email account can send messages that appear to originate from any OVH-hosted domains using the default SPF record. Since the SPF policy explicitly authorizes OVH mail servers (mx.ovh.com) to send mail on behalf of these domains, forged messages successfully pass SPF validation despite not being authorized by the impersonated domain owner.
- Product
- OVHcloud
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 6, 2026Subscriber Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WC Fields Factory <= 4.1.12 versions.CVE-2026-39727 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.5
Subscriber Cross Site Scripting (XSS) in WC Fields Factory <= 4.1.12 versions.
- Affected
- up to 4.1.12
- What to do
- Affects up to 4.1.12. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.