Critical security advisoryCriticalFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is on CISA’s exploited list. Most WordPress hosting runs PHP. See if your site is affectedFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is being exploited. DetailsExploited: PHP2Shell. Check your site
HuttenlocherTechnologies
Updated 32 min ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,762exploited flaws on CISA’s list
34added in the last 30 days
353new WordPress flaws this week
390,080entries in the database

28 results

  • Oct 14, 2026Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData aCVE-2026-110872 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2

    Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a quadratic complexity denial of service vulnerability in the SMTP client reply parser in SMTPConnection._onData and isPartialResponse. A malicious SMTP server or on-path attacker can stream continuation lines without a completion line before authentication, blocking the Node.js event loop and exhausting memory.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 14, 2026Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadraticCVE-2026-110871 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1

    Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.10 contains a denial of service vulnerability in MessageParser.parseHeaders that allows users to exhaust CPU through quadratic header unfolding. Attackers can supply large recipient lists or long headers that fold into tens of thousands of continuation lines, blocking the Node.js event loop during DKIM signing.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 14, 2026Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside anglCVE-2026-110870 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    Nodemailer from 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 contains an improper input validation vulnerability in its address parser that fails to strip RFC 5322 comments inside angle-bracket addresses. Attackers can supply recipients like a display name with a parenthesized comment in the domain, so illegal characters reach envelope.to and RCPT TO, causing rejected delivery or parser interpretation conflicts that bypass domain allow-lists.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 14, 2026Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain ovCVE-2026-110869 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    Nodemailer 3.0.0 before 10.0.13 has a regular expression denial of service in SMTPConnection._actionEHLO, whose four AUTH mechanism detection regexes contain overlapping whitespace sub-patterns that backtrack quadratically. A malicious or man-in-the-middle SMTP server can reply to EHLO with 250-AUTH, a long whitespace run and a non-matching token, blocking the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds to hours before authentication.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 26, 2026Nodemailer before 10.0.2 fails to properly flatten deeply nested arrays in recipient fields such as to, cc, and bcc, allowing attackers to cause stack exhaustioCVE-2026-100702 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2

    Nodemailer before 10.0.2 fails to properly flatten deeply nested arrays in recipient fields such as to, cc, and bcc, allowing attackers to cause stack exhaustion. Attackers can supply a deeply nested JSON recipient array that triggers recursive Array.toString() conversion, exhausting the call stack and terminating the Node.js process.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 26, 2026Nodemailer versions 5.0.0 through 10.0.1 use a process-global DNS cache that is keyed only by the DNS host, while each cache entry also stores the caller-specifCVE-2026-100701 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6

    Nodemailer versions 5.0.0 through 10.0.1 use a process-global DNS cache that is keyed only by the DNS host, while each cache entry also stores the caller-specific TLS servername. When two direct TLS/SMTPS transports (secure: true) resolve the same non-IP host with different tls.servername values, the first transport's servername is returned on the cache hit and overwrites the second transport's explicitly configured value, so Nodemailer sends the wrong SNI value and validates the peer certificate against the wrong identity. In multi-tenant services or SNI-routed SMTP gateways, an attacker who can prime the cache can cause a victim transport to connect to the attacker's TLS virtual host and accept the attacker's certificate even with rejectUnauthorized: true, disclosing the victim's SMTP credentials. Fixed in 10.0.2.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 26, 2026nodemailer before 10.0.6 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the addressparser free-text fallback regex pattern that exhibits quadratic backtracking bCVE-2026-100700 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    nodemailer before 10.0.6 contains a denial of service vulnerability in the addressparser free-text fallback regex pattern that exhibits quadratic backtracking behavior. Attackers can supply crafted email header values with long whitespace-free runs to block the Node.js event loop for tens of seconds, causing service unavailability.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 26, 2026Nodemailer is a Node.js email-sending library.CVE-2026-100699 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    Nodemailer is a Node.js email-sending library. In versions >= 9.1.0 and < 10.0.9, the address parser (src/addressparser) mishandles addresses whose local-part is a quoted string and that are followed by RFC 5322 comments, allowing trailing comment-separated domain atoms to be retained in the normalized address. For example, the input "user"@example.com(x)evil.com is parsed to the address value 'user@example.com evil.com', which contains additional attacker-controlled domain text separated by a literal space. This parsed value is used without further strict recipient validation when the message envelope is built (envelope.to in src/mime-node), so a malformed/ambiguous recipient address can be accepted and placed in the SMTP envelope. Whether this results in delivery to an unintended recipient on real SMTP servers has not been confirmed. The issue is a variant of the RFC 5322 comment parsing problem addressed in GHSA-cc9r-2j5m-2m83, affecting the separate quoted-local-part code path. Version 10.0.9 contains a fix.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 16, 2026Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different PunycodCVE-2026-92598 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    Nodemailer before 9.1.0 fails to apply UTS-46 normalization when encoding international domain names, causing the domain resolver to compute a different Punycode A-label than standards-compliant parsers. Attackers can craft recipient addresses with invisible characters or compatibility mappings that pass domain allow-list checks but are delivered to attacker-controlled domains via SMTP.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 16, 2026Nodemailer versions >= 6.9.16 and < 9.1.0 mis-parse RFC 5322 comments in email addresses: in lib/addressparser, a comment closed immediately before a non-break CVE-2026-92597 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    Nodemailer versions >= 6.9.16 and < 9.1.0 mis-parse RFC 5322 comments in email addresses: in lib/addressparser, a comment closed immediately before a non-break character causes the tokenizer to concatenate the atoms surrounding the comment instead of treating the comment as folding whitespace that terminates the domain. A recipient address such as user@good-corp.com(x)evil.com is therefore read by Nodemailer as the single domain good-corp.comevil.com (registrable domain comevil.com, which an attacker can register) and used for both the SMTP envelope (RCPT TO) and the emitted To:/From: headers, while a conformant RFC 5322 parser terminates the domain at the comment and reads good-corp.com. An application that validates the recipient domain with a strict RFC 5322 parser (without inspecting parse defects) or a naive prefix/substring allow-list and then hands the raw address to Nodemailer can be induced to deliver mail to a domain the attacker controls. Fixed in 9.1.0.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 16, 2026Nodemailer before 9.1.0 contains a quadratic time complexity vulnerability in the addressparser component that allows remote attackers to cause denial of servicCVE-2026-92596 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    Nodemailer before 9.1.0 contains a quadratic time complexity vulnerability in the addressparser component that allows remote attackers to cause denial of service by supplying a crafted comma-separated address list. Attackers can send a single email with a large number of addresses to block the Node.js event loop for extended periods, consuming 100% CPU and freezing the process.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 16, 2026Nodemailer (npm package `nodemailer`) versions 9.1.0 and earlier do not honor the `disableFileAccess` and `disableUrlAccess` sandbox options when message contenCVE-2026-92595 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6

    Nodemailer (npm package `nodemailer`) versions 9.1.0 and earlier do not honor the `disableFileAccess` and `disableUrlAccess` sandbox options when message content is resolved through the public plugin API `MailMessage.resolveContent()` using the documented legacy three-argument signature `resolveContent(data, key, callback)`. Because `shared.resolveContent()` normalizes the missing `options` argument to an empty object, the message-level flags copied into `mail.data` by the MailMessage constructor are discarded, and `resolveContentValue()` skips both access-control checks, reaching `nmfetch(url)` or `fs.createReadStream(path)`. As a result, plugin or application code that resolves untrusted message content (html, text, attachment `path` or `href`) via this API can be induced to read arbitrary local files or issue outbound HTTP(S) requests (server-side request forgery), bypassing the sandbox the application enabled. The internal paths used by `transporter.sendMail()` (`resolveAll()`, `_convertDataImages()`, and the MIME streaming path) are not affected. Fixed in version 9.1.1.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 13, 2026Nodemailer versions 9.1.0 through 10.0.4 contain a quadratic time complexity vulnerability in the addressparser component when parsing email addresses with RFC CVE-2026-90776 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    Nodemailer versions 9.1.0 through 10.0.4 contain a quadratic time complexity vulnerability in the addressparser component when parsing email addresses with RFC 5322 comments. Attackers can craft malicious email headers with comment-separated atoms to consume excessive CPU and block the Node.js event loop for several seconds, causing denial of service.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer before 8.0.4 is vulnerable to SMTP command injection through the unsanitized envelope.size parameter.CVE-2026-82854 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3

    Nodemailer before 8.0.4 is vulnerable to SMTP command injection through the unsanitized envelope.size parameter. When an application passes a custom envelope object with a size property containing CRLF characters to sendMail(), the value is concatenated into the SMTP MAIL FROM command (as SIZE=...) without sanitization, allowing injection of arbitrary SMTP commands such as RCPT TO to silently add attacker-controlled recipients. Exploitation requires the application to expose the envelope size to attacker-controlled input, as Nodemailer does not include size in the default auto-constructed envelope.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer versions before 8.0.5 contain an SMTP command injection vulnerability in the transport name option used in EHLO/HELO commands.CVE-2026-82853 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    Nodemailer versions before 8.0.5 contain an SMTP command injection vulnerability in the transport name option used in EHLO/HELO commands. The name parameter is concatenated directly into SMTP commands without sanitizing carriage return and line feed characters, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary SMTP commands for email spoofing and phishing attacks.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer before 8.0.8 disables TLS certificate verification in lib/fetch/index.js through rejectUnauthorized: false, allowing attackers to intercept OAuth2 toCVE-2026-82662 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    Nodemailer before 8.0.8 disables TLS certificate verification in lib/fetch/index.js through rejectUnauthorized: false, allowing attackers to intercept OAuth2 token requests. Attackers in a machine-in-the-middle position can capture OAuth client secrets, refresh tokens, and access tokens transmitted over compromised HTTPS connections.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to sanitize carriage return and line feed characters in list comment fields, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary message headerCVE-2026-82661 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to sanitize carriage return and line feed characters in list comment fields, allowing attackers to inject arbitrary message headers. An attacker with control over list.*.comment parameters can inject CRLF sequences to create additional headers in generated RFC822 messages, altering mail client behavior and message semantics.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to enforce disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess options during message normalization in jsonTransport.CVE-2026-82660 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    Nodemailer before 8.0.9 fails to enforce disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess options during message normalization in jsonTransport. Attackers can read local files or fetch URLs by supplying path or href values in message content fields, bypassing intended access controls.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026nodemailer before 9.0.1 fails to apply disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess flags to message-level raw option, allowing authenticated attackers to read arbitrCVE-2026-82659 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1

    nodemailer before 9.0.1 fails to apply disableFileAccess and disableUrlAccess flags to message-level raw option, allowing authenticated attackers to read arbitrary files or perform server-side request forgery by supplying path or href properties. Attackers can exploit this by crafting raw messages with file paths or URLs that bypass the intended sandbox, with fetched content delivered in the outgoing message to attacker-controlled recipients.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Aug 31, 2026nodemailer before 6.9.9 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in email parsing when attachDataUrls parameter is set or processing embeddCVE-2024-58379 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    nodemailer before 6.9.9 contains a regular expression denial of service vulnerability in email parsing when attachDataUrls parameter is set or processing embedded file attachments. Attackers can send specially crafted emails with malicious data URLs or embedded attachments to cause the event loop to hang and deny service.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • May 15, 2026An issue in Nodemailer smtp_server before v.3.18.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the SMTPStream._write, lib/smtp-stream.js componentCVE-2026-38728 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 7.5

    An issue in Nodemailer smtp_server before v.3.18.3 allows a remote attacker to cause a denial of service via the SMTPStream._write, lib/smtp-stream.js components

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Mar 3, 2026Versions of the package mailparser before 3.9.3 are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the textToHtml() function due to the improper sanitisation of UCVE-2026-3455 · Other software · Nodemailer · reported by report@snyk.ioLow 2

    Versions of the package mailparser before 3.9.3 are vulnerable to Cross-site Scripting (XSS) via the textToHtml() function due to the improper sanitisation of URLs in the email content. An attacker can execute arbitrary scripts in victim browsers by adding extra quote " to the URL with embedded malicious JavaScript code.

    Product
    Mailparser
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Dec 18, 2025A flaw was found in Nodemailer.CVE-2025-14874 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by Red HatHigh 7.5

    A flaw was found in Nodemailer. This vulnerability allows a denial of service (DoS) via a crafted email address header that triggers infinite recursion in the address parser.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Nov 14, 2025A vulnerability was identified in the email parsing library due to improper handling of specially formatted recipient email addresses.CVE-2025-13033 · Other software · nodemailer · reported by Red HatHigh 7.5

    A vulnerability was identified in the email parsing library due to improper handling of specially formatted recipient email addresses. An attacker can exploit this flaw by crafting a recipient address that embeds an external address within quotes. This causes the application to misdirect the email to the attacker's external address instead of the intended internal recipient. This could lead to a significant data leak of sensitive information and allow an attacker to bypass security filters and access controls.

    Product
    nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Jun 29, 2021The package nodemailer before 6.6.1 are vulnerable to HTTP Header Injection if unsanitized user input that may contain newlines and carriage returns is passed iCVE-2021-23400 · Other software · Nodemailer · reported by report@snyk.ioMedium 6.3

    The package nodemailer before 6.6.1 are vulnerable to HTTP Header Injection if unsanitized user input that may contain newlines and carriage returns is passed into an address object.

    Product
    Nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Nov 12, 2020This affects the package nodemailer before 6.4.16.CVE-2020-7769 · Other software · Nodemailer · reported by report@snyk.ioHigh 8.6

    This affects the package nodemailer before 6.4.16. Use of crafted recipient email addresses may result in arbitrary command flag injection in sendmail transport for sending mails.

    Product
    Nodemailer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Jun 6, 2018nodemailer.js was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables.CVE-2017-16072 · Other software · HackerOne · reported by support@hackerone.comHigh 7.5

    nodemailer.js was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm.

    Product
    nodemailer.js node module
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Jun 6, 2018nodemailer-js was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables.CVE-2017-16071 · Other software · HackerOne · reported by support@hackerone.comHigh 7.5

    nodemailer-js was a malicious module published with the intent to hijack environment variables. It has been unpublished by npm.

    Product
    nodemailer-js node module
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get in touch

Tell us what you're building.

A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.

01The person who'll do the work writes back
02A short call, then a written plan with the price
03Nothing starts until you say yes
04Hacked or down right now? Call, and we pick up the same day
843-331-6339

Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.

What do you need?
Build
Grow
Protect
Urgent

No newsletter, no sales sequence. Just a reply.