Updated 3 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,764exploited flaws on CISA’s list

35added in the last 30 days

479new WordPress flaws this week

390,525entries in the database

9,136 results · page 7 of 183

Sep 27, 2026Obot before v0.23.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in remote MCP server registration that allows privileged users to specify arbitrary URLCVE-2026-101064 · Other software · obot-platform · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Obot before v0.23.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in remote MCP server registration that allows privileged users to specify arbitrary URLs without destination validation. Attackers with Power User or higher roles can coerce Obot to make requests to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints, reading responses in error messages to disclose sensitive credentials.
Product
obot
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 27, 2026utcp-gql before 1.1.1 and utcp-websocket before 1.1.1 contain server-side request forgery vulnerabilities due to incomplete application of CVE-2026-44661 fixes.CVE-2026-101061 · Other software · universal-tool-calling-protocol · reported by VulnCheckLow 2.3
utcp-gql before 1.1.1 and utcp-websocket before 1.1.1 contain server-side request forgery vulnerabilities due to incomplete application of CVE-2026-44661 fixes. The GraphQL plugin uses a vulnerable prefix check allowing bypass URLs like http://127.0.0.1.attacker.example, while the WebSocket plugin performs no URL validation despite documented security requirements. Attackers can force connections to internal services and cloud metadata endpoints by supplying malicious tool URLs in call templates, and receive configured API keys and OAuth tokens sent to attacker-controlled hosts.
Product
python-utcp
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 27, 2026python-utcp versions before 1.1.4 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in HttpCommunicationProtocol.call_tool that validates the initial tool URLCVE-2026-101060 · Other software · universal-tool-calling-protocol · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
python-utcp versions before 1.1.4 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in HttpCommunicationProtocol.call_tool that validates the initial tool URL but follows HTTP redirects without re-validating the target. Attackers controlling a tool endpoint can return a 302 redirect to internal services, allowing the UTCP client to reach cloud metadata endpoints or internal HTTP services and return their response bodies to the caller.
Product
python-utcp
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 27, 2026MatchTrustedPeer ignores the public key used, leading to forged CA clones passing verification.CVE-2026-93302 · Other software · wolfSSL · reported by facts@wolfssl.comHigh 8.3
MatchTrustedPeer ignores the public key used, leading to forged CA clones passing verification. Affected builds are any that enable the macro WOLFSSL_TRUST_PEER_CERT and load CA certificates with wolfSSL_CTX_trust_peer_cert() or wolfSSL_trust_peer_cert(). The peer must know the certificates being loaded to either of those APIs to take advantage of the issue. When OPENSSL_COMPATIBLE_DEFAULTS is also defined this widens the affected API to include all CA certificate loading. Both macros are defined when using autoconf builds such as (nginx, haproxy, stunnel, wpas, apache httpd, hitch, bind, rsyslog, ffmpeg, all, distro). When the certificate is listed as a trusted peer certificate the issue previously allowed for a malicious (D)TLS server to bypass authentication once knowing which CA’s the client would accept. This also affects mutual authentication cases where the client knows which CA’s the server has loaded. If building with any of these configurations and using (D)TLS where the loaded CA’s could be known and authentication of the peer is desired, users should either: update to the latest wolfSSL version, apply the fix patch, or use the configure flag --disable-openssl-compatible
Product
wolfSSL
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Sep 26, 2026Heym versions 0.0.90 and earlier contain two server-side request forgery (SSRF) egress gaps, both remediated in app/services/ssrf_guard.py in 0.0.91.CVE-2026-100863 · Other software · heymrun · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Heym versions 0.0.90 and earlier contain two server-side request forgery (SSRF) egress gaps, both remediated in app/services/ssrf_guard.py in 0.0.91. First, the LLM image-edit input loader (_load_image_bytes) fetched caller-controlled HTTP/HTTPS URLs with a bare httpx.get, applying only a scheme check and bypassing the egress-pinning HTTP client; because the workflow DSL supports "imageInput": "$userInput.body.imageUrl", a webhook or API caller can choose the fetch target when a workflow author uses that expression, allowing requests to loopback, RFC1918, and cloud metadata endpoints. Second, _is_public_address unwrapped only IPv4-mapped IPv6 addresses, so IPv6 transition forms — the NAT64 well-known prefix 64:ff9b::/96, deprecated IPv4-compatible ::x.x.x.x addresses, and 6to4 (2002::/16, classified as globally routable by Python 3.11.0 through 3.11.9) — could carry loopback, RFC1918, link-local, or cloud-metadata IPv4 destinations past both the initial URL validation and the dial-time IP pin. Version 0.0.91 routes the image loader through guard_http_url and the guarded client, evaluates NAT64 and IPv4-compatible addresses by their embedded IPv4 address, and refuses 64:ff9b:1::/48,
Product
heym
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026heym before 0.0.109 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Slack, Discord, and Crawler workflow nodes.CVE-2026-100858 · Other software · heymrun · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.6
heym before 0.0.109 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the Slack, Discord, and Crawler workflow nodes. These nodes issue HTTP requests to URLs taken from user-created credentials (webhook_url / flaresolverr_url) using an unguarded HTTP client, bypassing the SSRF egress guard that already protects the HTTP, WebSocket, and MCP nodes; the credential API validates only that the URL is non-empty. Any registered user can create a credential pointing at an internal address and execute a workflow, causing the backend to reach loopback, private, link-local, or cloud-metadata endpoints and return the full response body in the node output (non-blind SSRF).
Product
heym
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026AzuraCast before 0.23.8 contains a server-side request forgery and local file read vulnerability in the AutoDJ remote playlist fetch (backend/src/Radio/AutoDJ/QCVE-2026-100850 · Other software · AzuraCast · reported by VulnCheckMedium 4.8
AzuraCast before 0.23.8 contains a server-side request forgery and local file read vulnerability in the AutoDJ remote playlist fetch (backend/src/Radio/AutoDJ/QueueBuilder.php, getMediaFromRemoteUrl()). A user with the station Media permission can create or update a playlist with source=remote_url and remote_type=playlist whose remote_url points at a file:// path or an internal/loopback/link-local HTTP endpoint. When AutoDJ builds the queue, the backend passes the user-supplied URL directly to file_get_contents() with no scheme allowlist and no private/loopback/metadata IP policy (PHP allow_url_fopen is enabled by default, including in the Docker image). Lines from the fetched resource are parsed as M3U/PLS entries, stored in StationQueue.autodj_custom_uri, and returned by GET /api/station/{station_id}/queue to any user with the Broadcasting permission, disclosing host files readable by the web container (for example /etc/passwd or the application .env) and the bodies of non-blind internal HTTP requests. No patched version was available at the time of publication.
Product
AzuraCast
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026Kyverno before 1.19.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery.CVE-2026-100705 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Kyverno before 1.19.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery. The default egress blocklist (169.254.169.254, 169.254.169.253, metadata.google.internal, 127.0.0.0/8, ::1/128) and the scoped-token control were wired only into the new CEL http.Get/Post library and were never applied to the legacy apiCall service executor (pkg/engine/apicall/executor.go) or to the GlobalContextEntry external-API path, which handle every non-CEL context[].apiCall.service call. Because these paths use a plain net/http client with no egress filtering and no validation of the configured service URL, a ClusterPolicy or GlobalContextEntry author — or, where a deployed policy templates the service URL from the admission resource, a lower-privileged resource submitter — can cause Kyverno to issue GET/POST requests to an arbitrary host, including the cloud metadata endpoint, loopback, and any in-cluster service, reading cloud instance credentials and reaching internal endpoints with Kyverno's network position. The executor also unconditionally attaches Kyverno's projected ServiceAccount token to the attacker-chosen destination; the token is audience-scoped, limiting its replay value. Fixed in 1.19.1.
Product
kyverno
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026Adminer 4.16.0 through 6.0.1 contain a pre-authentication Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the optional Elasticsearch driver (plugins/driversCVE-2026-100696 · Other software · vrana · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Adminer 4.16.0 through 6.0.1 contain a pre-authentication Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the optional Elasticsearch driver (plugins/drivers/elastic.php), fixed in 6.0.2. Because adminer/include/auth.inc.php invokes Driver::connect() before the login result is validated, an unauthenticated attacker who submits crafted auth[server], auth[username], and auth[password] parameters can cause the Adminer server to issue an HTTP GET request (via get_url()/file_get_contents()) to an arbitrary reachable host and port. The driver validates only general server syntax and does not block loopback, private, link-local, or other reserved addresses; if no port is given it appends the default 9200, and Adminer's generic port check rejects ports below 1024. Selected JSON error fields from non-2xx Elasticsearch-style responses, as well as connection failures, are rendered on the login page, providing a port-scanning oracle and enabling internal network reconnaissance and service fingerprinting. Exploitation requires that the optional Elasticsearch driver be explicitly deployed (e.g., via the adminer/elastic.php template or an adminer_object() configuration; it is not loaded in a d
Product
adminer
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026Budibase before 3.45.0 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery and credential exfiltration vulnerability in the Microsoft Teams webhook endpointCVE-2026-100681 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.3
Budibase before 3.45.0 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery and credential exfiltration vulnerability in the Microsoft Teams webhook endpoint that accepts forged Bot Framework activities with arbitrary serviceUrl values. Attackers can submit a crafted POST request to inject an attacker-controlled serviceUrl that is persisted and used for all subsequent bot replies, causing the server to send live Microsoft OAuth access tokens in Authorization headers to the attacker's host and enabling blind internal network access.
Product
server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026SiYuan versions from v2.1.0 before v3.8.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the CheckAuth lock-screen pass-through branch that grants adminiCVE-2026-100642 · Other software · siyuan-note · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
SiYuan versions from v2.1.0 before v3.8.4 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the CheckAuth lock-screen pass-through branch that grants administrator access to loopback requests without validating Origin headers. Attackers can craft malicious web pages that force victims to terminate the kernel process, read workspace configuration and proxy settings, and trigger administrative actions via zero-credential cross-origin requests from the victim's browser.
Product
siyuan
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026ClawHub (openclaw/clawhub) application/backend contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the public profile preview's image fetching.CVE-2026-100601 · Other software · openclaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
ClawHub (openclaw/clawhub) application/backend contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the public profile preview's image fetching. The preview accepts a user-supplied image URL and checks the textual hostname against private-address patterns, but does not validate or pin the resolved network destination, so a public-looking hostname can resolve to an internal address or change resolution between validation and connection (DNS rebinding). A maintainer-run local harness demonstrated an outbound connection to an owner-controlled loopback listener; access to production internal services, credential disclosure, and code execution were not demonstrated. The issue was confirmed at revision cbfee7343ddc867316dd9b3de6fa8856730f9f41; the complete historical affected range was not established. Fixed by PR #3683, included in revision 8c2de6c506bb4efabe3f0c2ffb8370b9e23d4650, which was deployed to clawhub.ai on 2026-09-11; self-hosted deployments should update to that revision or a later descendant. The npm CLI and OpenClaw runtime are separate products and are not affected.
Product
clawhub
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser wait predicates that allows attackers to bypass SSRF protectionCVE-2026-100576 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser wait predicates that allows attackers to bypass SSRF protections by reaching blocked destinations. Attackers can use the wait --fn function against an existing browser session to request loopback or private destinations without navigation checks applied to other browser actions.
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.8.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its trusted-host DNS checks.CVE-2026-100574 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
OpenClaw (npm package 'openclaw') before 2026.8.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its trusted-host DNS checks. For fetches that use the trusted-host DNS recheck, a trusted hostname that resolves to an unspecified address (0.0.0.0 or ::) bypasses the SSRF destination validation. An attacker who can influence DNS for an allowed hostname can therefore cause a guarded fetch to reach a service bound only to loopback and disclose its response; the practical impact depends on the reachable service and the data it returns. Fixed in 2026.8.1.
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 25, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the extensions manager that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions withCVE-2026-100524 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the extensions manager that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions without anti-CSRF token validation. Attackers can craft links or embed images to force administrators to install, update, pause, or unpause extensions by tricking them into visiting a malicious page while authenticated.
Product
Cotonti
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 25, 2026MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy routes due to missing and incomplete destination validation in CVE-2026-100391 · Other software · mhdzumair · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.8
MediaFlow Proxy through 2.4.9 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /proxy routes due to missing and incomplete destination validation in the d query parameter. Remote attackers can supply arbitrary internal URLs including loopback and cloud metadata endpoints to read full responses from the proxy server.
Product
mediaflow-proxy
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenMetadata through 2.0.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the URLValidator.validateURL function that fails to properly resolve DNS hostCVE-2026-100373 · Other software · open-metadata · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
OpenMetadata through 2.0.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the URLValidator.validateURL function that fails to properly resolve DNS hostnames and validate internal addresses. Users permitted to create or update EventSubscription can set webhook destinations to internal hosts, allowing the server to send requests to private networks and cloud metadata endpoints while returning HTTP status codes that enable blind SSRF probing.
Product
OpenMetadata
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record gist.github.com github.com
Sep 25, 2026An unauthenticated sender can forge a share notification that triggers stored XSS when a signed-in Zimbra Modern recipient clicks Accept Share, allowing the attCVE-2026-93642 · Email & office · Zimbra · reported by cve@rapid7.comCritical 9.3
An unauthenticated sender can forge a share notification that triggers stored XSS when a signed-in Zimbra Modern recipient clicks Accept Share, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim.
Product
Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wiki.zimbra.com
Sep 25, 2026An unauthenticated sender can forge a share notification that triggers stored XSS when a signed-in Zimbra Classic recipient clicks Accept Share, allowing the atCVE-2026-93641 · Email & office · Zimbra · reported by cve@rapid7.comCritical 9.3
An unauthenticated sender can forge a share notification that triggers stored XSS when a signed-in Zimbra Classic recipient clicks Accept Share, allowing the attacker to access mailbox data and act as the victim.
Product
Zimbra Collaboration Suite (ZCS)
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wiki.zimbra.com
Sep 25, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Image API (v2) of OpenStack Glance.CVE-2026-51772 · Other software · reported by MITREMedium 6.5
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the Image API (v2) of OpenStack Glance. When the show_multiple_locations configuration option is enabled in glance-api.conf, an authenticated attacker can manipulate the locations attribute of an image in the queued state by sending a crafted HTTP PATCH request
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 25, 2026Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-12037 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.5
The Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.4.0.5 via the 'page_url' parameter. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services. This vulnerability is only reachable when the plugin's dom_get_type setting has been configured to 'wp_remote_post' by an administrator.
Product
Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster
Affected
up to 1.4.0.5
What to do
Affects up to 1.4.0.5. Update Asset CleanUp: Page Speed Booster to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 25, 2026Elementor Website Builder: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVE-2026-62062 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Elementor Website Builder allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Elementor Website Builder: from n/a through 4.3.1.
Product
Elementor Website Builder
Affected
up to 4.3.1
What to do
Affects up to 4.3.1. Update Elementor Website Builder to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 24, 2026IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.8 was vulnerable to path traversal in its Admin API log-download endpoint (`GET /v1/admin/logs/file`).CVE-2026-77825 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 4.9
IBM ContextForge MCP Gateway 1.0.0 through 1.0.8 was vulnerable to path traversal in its Admin API log-download endpoint (`GET /v1/admin/logs/file`). The path confinement check uses `str.startswith()` rather than proper boundary validation, allowing an authenticated admin to read `.log`, `.jsonl`, and `.json` files outside the configured `LOG_FOLDER` by supplying a filename that resolves into a sibling directory whose absolute path shares the log directory's string prefix.
Product
ContextForge MCP Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 24, 2026mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resource_metadata URL extracted from a remote MCP server'CVE-2026-51994 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
mcp-remote versions 0.1.32 through 0.1.38 are vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) via the resource_metadata URL extracted from a remote MCP server's WWW-Authenticate header
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 24, 2026Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer: Blind Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-18335 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.4
The Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Blind Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 6.2.0 via the 'kirki_data' Parameter. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
Product
Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer
Affected
up to 6.2.0
What to do
Affects up to 6.2.0. Update Kirki – Freeform Page Builder, Website Builder & Customizer to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org wordfence.com
Sep 23, 2026A server-side request forgery flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller email notification backend.CVE-2026-84721 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatMedium 6.4
A server-side request forgery flaw was found in the Ansible Automation Platform automation-controller email notification backend. The email backend passes the user-supplied SMTP host and port from a notification template directly to the SMTP client without validating that the target is not an internal, loopback, link-local, or reserved address. An authenticated user with organization notification-admin permission can create or modify an email notification template pointing at an arbitrary internal address, trigger a test, and have the controller task process open a raw TCP connection to that address. The resulting connection error is reflected back through the notification record, providing a three-state internal port-scan oracle (open, closed, filtered) over the control-plane's cluster network, including the in-cluster Kubernetes API. When a shared organization template holds a stored SMTP password, redirecting the host can also cause that credential to be transmitted to an attacker-controlled server.
Product
Red Hat Ansible Automation Platform 2.7
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Sep 23, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Capabilities <= 2.50.1 versions.CVE-2026-94487 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in PublishPress Capabilities <= 2.50.1 versions.
Affected
up to 2.50.1
What to do
Affects up to 2.50.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Sep 23, 2026Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) VulnerabilityCVE-2026-96655 · Other software · Plex · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725ExploitedMedium 5.3
Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could allow an authenticated user to request arbitrary internal or external addresses via the '/video/:/transcode/universal' path parameter. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96652, CVE-2026-96654, and CVE-2026-96656.
Product
Media Server
On CISA’s list since
Oct 20, 2026 (federal fix deadline Nov 3, 2026)
What to do
Attackers are using this now. Install Plex’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record CISA catalog forums.plex.tv raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 23, 2026Plex Media Server Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) VulnerabilityCVE-2026-96652 · Other software · Plex · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725ExploitedMedium 5.3
Plex Media Server contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability which could allow an attacker using any X-Plex-Token value to include a full URL in the 'protocol' parameter and force the Plex server to POST to the attacker's chosen destination. This vulnerability can be chained with CVE-2026-96654, CVE-2026-96655, and CVE-2026-96656.
Product
Media Server
On CISA’s list since
Oct 20, 2026 (federal fix deadline Nov 3, 2026)
What to do
Attackers are using this now. Install Plex’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record CISA catalog forums.plex.tv raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 23, 2026Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc.CVE-2026-77112 · Other software · Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trMedium 6.5
Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Global IT Informatics Technology Services Inc. Weoll allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Weoll: before 3.2.45.44.
Product
Weoll
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record siberguvenlik.gov.tr
Sep 22, 2026IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authenticatioCVE-2026-18153 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 5.4
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote authenticated attacker to obtain sensitive information and forge authentication tags due to the use of hard-coded cryptographic keys and initialization vectors.
Product
Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 22, 2026IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of crypCVE-2026-18152 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.4
IBM Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift could allow a remote attacker to forge validly-signed messages due to improper verification of cryptographic signatures.
Product
Financial Transaction Manager (FTM) for RedHat OpenShift
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 22, 2026IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-16426 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 6.5
IBM Concert 1.0.0 through 3.0.0 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
Product
Concert
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 22, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the notebook viewer of GitHub Enterprise Server.CVE-2026-77987 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comCritical 9.3
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in the notebook viewer of GitHub Enterprise Server. The notebook viewer validated the scheme and host of a user-supplied URL but did not validate the port, allowing requests to be directed to internal services listening on other ports of the same appliance. Response bodies were not returned to the requester, but response timing acted as an oracle that allowed instance secrets to be extracted character by character. An extracted secret could then be used in a separate interaction with an internal service to obtain remote code execution on the appliance. Exploitation required network access to the instance and was unauthenticated when private mode was disabled, or required any authenticated user when private mode was enabled. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server versions 3.17 through 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.22.1, 3.21.6, 3.20.8, 3.19.12, 3.18.15, and 3.17.21. This vulnerability was reported through the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
Product
Enterprise Server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.github.com docs.github.com
Sep 22, 2026Premiere Pro is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation potentially resulting in unauthorized wCVE-2026-84395 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 7.1
Premiere Pro is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation potentially resulting in unauthorized write access. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Premiere
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82000 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.6
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-81999 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 8.7
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. An attacker with high privileges could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass.CVE-2026-75743 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 7.1
Adobe Experience Manager Forms JEE is affected by a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability that could result in a Security feature bypass. An attacker could leverage this vulnerability to bypass security measures and gain unauthorized write access, causing a limited disruption to availability. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a maliciously crafted URL or interact with a compromised web page.
Product
AEM 6.5 Forms JEE
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-83660 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Campaign Classic
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82443 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.6
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Campaign Classic
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 22, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-82013 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to gain elevated access to internal resources. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Campaign Classic
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Sep 21, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the serverRequest function of nocobase v2.1.21 allows authenticated attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted HCVE-2026-88403 · Other software · reported by MITREMedium 6.5
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the serverRequest function of nocobase v2.1.21 allows authenticated attackers to scan internal resources via a crafted HTTP request.
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 21, 2026CuteNews v.2.1.2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in core/modules/media.php -- upload_from_inet (Media Manager's "Upload by URL" functionalitCVE-2026-36469 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
CuteNews v.2.1.2 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in core/modules/media.php -- upload_from_inet (Media Manager's "Upload by URL" functionality).
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 19, 2026Wow Elements Addons for Elementor: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-1641 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 6.5
The Wow Elements Addons for Elementor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.11.2. This is due to the plugin passing user-controlled input from the 'Changelog File' setting directly to the wp_remote_get function without adequate validation or sanitization of the URL. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Contributor-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application and can be used to query and modify information from internal services.
Product
Wow Elements Addons for Elementor
Affected
up to 1.11.2
What to do
Affects up to 1.11.2. Update Wow Elements Addons for Elementor to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 18, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages.CVE-2026-93873 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the contact plugin submission handler, allowing attackers to forge messages. Attackers can auto-submit contact forms from attacker-controlled pages to send forged messages attributed to authenticated victims to the administrator inbox.
Product
Cotonti
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 18, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated userCVE-2026-93870 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 fails to validate anti-CSRF tokens in the ratings plugin AJAX handler, allowing attackers to forge ratings on behalf of authenticated users. Attackers can craft malicious pages that auto-submit POST requests to modify stored rating data when visited by logged-in users.
Product
Cotonti
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 18, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-84084 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 18, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.CVE-2026-84077 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to bypass security restrictions due to a cross-site request forgery vulnerability.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 18, 2026A vulnerability was identified in Forget-C Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio 0.1.0-alpha/0.2.0/0.3.0/0.3.1/0.3.2.CVE-2026-93559 · Other software · Forget-C · reported by VulDBMedium 6.9
A vulnerability was identified in Forget-C Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio 0.1.0-alpha/0.2.0/0.3.0/0.3.1/0.3.2. This affects an unknown function of the file backend/app/dependencies.py of the component FastAPI. The manipulation leads to missing authentication. It is possible to initiate the attack remotely. The reported GitHub issue was closed automatically due to inactivity.
Product
Jellyfish AI Short Drama Studio
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vuldb.com
Sep 18, 2026IBM Common Licensing Agent 9.0, Agent 9.0.0.1, Agent 9.0.0.2, ART 9.0, ART 9.0.0.1, and ART 9.0.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could alloCVE-2025-15399 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 10
IBM Common Licensing Agent 9.0, Agent 9.0.0.1, Agent 9.0.0.2, ART 9.0, ART 9.0.0.1, and ART 9.0.0.2 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
Product
Common Licensing
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.