Updated 7 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,766exploited flaws on CISA’s list

36added in the last 30 days

544new WordPress flaws this week

391,181entries in the database

7,731 results · page 7 of 155

Oct 3, 2026The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights): Arbitrary shortcode executionCVE-2026-100152 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 6.5
The The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to arbitrary shortcode execution in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.2 This is due to the software allowing users to execute an action that does not properly validate a value before running do_shortcode. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to execute arbitrary shortcodes. This requires the AIOSEO breadcrumb to be rendered on the search results page via the block, widget, shortcode, or template tag.
Product
The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights)
Affected
up to 5.0.2
What to do
Affects up to 5.0.2. Update The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights) to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 2, 2026ImageMagick before 7.1.2-32 and 6.9.13-57 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in LoadPolicyCache that silently skips security policy rules when policy.xml usCVE-2026-105083 · Other software · ImageMagick · reported by VulnCheckLow 1.8
ImageMagick before 7.1.2-32 and 6.9.13-57 contains a policy bypass vulnerability in LoadPolicyCache that silently skips security policy rules when policy.xml uses an alternate DOCTYPE. A valid DOCTYPE not ending in ']>' makes the parser consume the rest of the file, so no policy rules are applied and restricted operations become allowed.
Product
ImageMagick
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 2, 2026UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains an account enumeration vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to determine registered email addresses by observingCVE-2026-82043 · Other software · UTMStack · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains an account enumeration vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to determine registered email addresses by observing differing HTTP responses from the POST /api/account/reset-password/init endpoint. Attackers can submit arbitrary email addresses and distinguish registered accounts, which return 200 OK, from unregistered accounts, which trigger a 500 Internal Server Error with backend error details, enabling targeted phishing or credential attacks.
Product
UTMStack
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 2, 2026OS command injection in the Studio Space startup validation script in Amazon SageMaker Distribution 2.x before 2.14.12, 3.x before 3.9.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.11, CVE-2026-104019 · Other software · AWS · reported by ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5Critical 9.3
OS command injection in the Studio Space startup validation script in Amazon SageMaker Distribution 2.x before 2.14.12, 3.x before 3.9.12, 4.0.x before 4.0.11, 4.1.x before 4.1.11, 4.2.x before 4.2.8, 4.3.x before 4.3.5, and 4.4.x before 4.4.3, as used by Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio, might allow an authenticated remote user with project contributor permissions to execute arbitrary commands in another project member's Studio Space and obtain that member's temporary execution role credentials via a crafted connection resource property that is interpolated into a shell invocation without neutralization. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 2.14.12, 3.9.12, 4.0.11, 4.1.11, 4.2.8, 4.3.5, or 4.4.3, as applicable to the minor line in use. Users on minor lines that have reached end of support must move to a supported minor line, because no patched version will be released for those lines. In Amazon SageMaker Unified Studio, Studio Spaces adopt the latest patch of their minor line on restart once the patched images are deployed, so no version selection is required.
Product
sagemaker-distribution
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record aws.amazon.com github.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the filemanager page handler, which deletes page attachments on GET requests withoutCVE-2026-104452 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the filemanager page handler, which deletes page attachments on GET requests without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in page owner or administrator into a top-level GET navigation with do=del, erase, or emptytrash, deleting or permanently purging the page's attachments.
Product
yeswiki
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an authentication bypass in the contact mail AJAX handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to send email through the wiki's SCVE-2026-104446 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an authentication bypass in the contact mail AJAX handler that allows unauthenticated attackers to send email through the wiki's SMTP server. Attackers can POST an XMLHttpRequest to the mail handler without field or type parameters, supplying arbitrary recipient, sender, subject and body for spam and phishing.
Product
yeswiki
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic trCVE-2026-104443 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic triples regardless of ownership. Attackers can send an empty filter to the triples delete endpoint to remove the admins-group membership triple, emptying the admin group and causing a site-wide authorization lockout.
Product
yeswiki
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a user enumeration vulnerability in LostPasswordAction.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to confirm registered email addreCVE-2026-104439 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a user enumeration vulnerability in LostPasswordAction.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to confirm registered email addresses through differing responses. Attackers can submit emails to the MotDePassePerdu recovery page without rate limiting to identify valid accounts for targeted phishing or password-spraying.
Product
yeswiki
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026Zebra before 6.1.0 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability in remaining_transaction_value that clones the entire block-level spent-UTXO mapCVE-2026-104426 · Other software · ZcashFoundation · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Zebra before 6.1.0 contains an inefficient algorithmic complexity vulnerability in remaining_transaction_value that clones the entire block-level spent-UTXO map per transaction during contextual verification. Attackers can mine or seed the mempool with roughly 26,000 minimal single-input transactions in one block, stalling every validating node for over 52 seconds.
Product
zebra
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights): DOM-Based Cross-Site ScriptingCVE-2026-85492 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 6.1
The All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights) plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to DOM-Based Cross-Site Scripting via URL Pathname in all versions up to, and including, 5.0.1.1 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user visits a crafted URL. Exploitation requires the victim to hold the aioseo_manage_seo capability and to open the SEO Preview panel in the WordPress admin toolbar while visiting a page with a malicious payload embedded in the URL pathname.
Product
All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights)
Affected
up to 5.0.1.1
What to do
Affects up to 5.0.1.1. Update All in One SEO – AI SEO Plugin to Boost SEO Rankings & Traffic (Schema, Local SEO, Sitemap & SEO Insights) to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 2, 2026Newsletter – Send awesome emails from: Stored Cross-Site ScriptingCVE-2026-96566 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceHigh 7.2
The Newsletter – Send awesome emails from WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Stored Cross-Site Scripting via 'np1' Custom Field Parameter in all versions up to, and including, 9.4.0 due to insufficient input sanitization and output escaping. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary web scripts in pages that will execute whenever a user accesses an injected page. The subscription endpoint (na=sa) requires no nonce, no capability check, and no CAPTCHA, and the payload can be smuggled past email-address validation by embedding the {profile_1} placeholder in the local part of the submitted address, since WordPress's is_email() permits curly braces there.
Product
Newsletter – Send awesome emails from
Affected
up to 9.4.0
What to do
Affects up to 9.4.0. Update Newsletter – Send awesome emails from to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Oct 2, 2026WP Mail Logging: Does not properly restrict the HTML and CSS of logged emails before rendering them in its admin log screensCVE-2026-1661 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 4.3
The WP Mail Logging WordPress plugin before 1.17.0 does not properly restrict the HTML and CSS of logged emails before rendering them in its admin log screens, allowing unauthenticated users to inject styled content and links, for example through a public contact form, that can deceive an administrator viewing the log and send their browser to an attacker-controlled page.
Product
WP Mail Logging
Fixed in
1.17.0
What to do
Update WP Mail Logging to 1.17.0 or newer.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wpscan.com
Oct 1, 2026deeptutor 1.4.0 contains an authorization bypass through a user-controlled object identifier in TurnRuntimeManager.regenerate_last_turn.CVE-2026-51878 · Other software · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
deeptutor 1.4.0 contains an authorization bypass through a user-controlled object identifier in TurnRuntimeManager.regenerate_last_turn. A remote caller can enumerate or obtain a session_id and trigger regenerate on another user's session.
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record gist.github.com github.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-12542 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatMedium 5.3
A flaw was found in Foreman. The foreman-tail utility is vulnerable to OS command injection due to the unsafe use of the eval command. The script takes user-supplied arguments and incorporates them directly into a string that is then executed by eval to expand file paths. Because the input is not sanitized or quoted, a local attacker can inject shell metacharacters (e.g., ;, &, |) to execute arbitrary system commands.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-96659 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatCritical 9.1
A flaw was found in Foreman. This vulnerability allows an authenticated user with low-level Viewer permissions to cause unauthorized information disclosure by submitting requests to template preview endpoints. By exploiting this issue, the user can access sensitive data, such as host root passwords. Furthermore, under insecure system configurations where Safemode protections are disabled, the flaw may allow the user to execute arbitrary commands as the Foreman system account.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-96658 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 8.8
A flaw was found in Foreman. This vulnerability allows an authenticated remote attacker with low-level read permissions to achieve arbitrary code execution on the underlying server. By manipulating the permitted methods list within the template rendering engine, an attacker can bypass the safemode sandbox isolation and execute unauthorized commands directly on the host system.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-12544 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 7.7
A flaw was found in Foreman. The foreman-rake initialization logic in /usr/share/foreman/config/settings.rb contains a vulnerable code pattern where configuration data is processed through two distinct executable layers. This creates a multi-stage execution chain that allows for both Server-Side Template Injection (SSTI) and insecure deserialization. This vulnerability can lead to remote code execution, total infrastructure compromise and supply chain risk.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-12541 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 8.2
A flaw was found in Foreman. OS command injection vulnerabilities exist in the foreman-rake db:dump and db:import_dump tasks. The application fails to properly sanitize user-supplied input in the destination parameter (during backups) and the file parameter (during imports) before passing them to a Ruby system() call for execution. An attacker with permissions to execute foreman-rake (e.g., via a restricted sudo configuration) can append malicious shell commands to the provided file paths.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-12540 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 8.2
A flaw was found in Foreman. A command injection vulnerability exists in the foreman-rake errors:fetch_log task. The request_id parameter is passed to an underlying system command (typically grep) without adequate shell neutralization. While the task is intended to fetch specific log entries, an attacker with sudo permissions to execute this rake task can inject shell metacharacters (such as ;, ", or |) to break out of the intended command and execute arbitrary code.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in Foreman.CVE-2026-12423 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 7.5
A flaw was found in Foreman. The Red Hat Satellite /unattended/provision API endpoint is vulnerable to an authentication bypass due to a semantic logic flaw in host_verifier.rb. The application verifies the database state of a provisioning token rather than its actual presence in the incoming HTTP request. Because a host actively undergoing provisioning has an unexpired token in the database, the server's valid_host_token? method evaluates to true, granting access to the kickstart template even if the requester provides no token at all in the URL.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026A flaw was found in rubygem-foreman_remote_execution.CVE-2026-12405 · Other software · Red Hat · reported by Red HatHigh 8.8
A flaw was found in rubygem-foreman_remote_execution. A command injection vulnerability exists in the Red Hat Satellite API (/api/v2/job_invocations). When a job template has the effective_user property marked as overridable: true, the application fails to properly sanitize the effective_user input provided during the API request. The exploitation does not rely on the content or logic of the Job Template/playbook itself; rather, the injection occurs during the instantiation of the job execution environment by the Satellite server. An attacker with permissions to execute job templates can inject arbitrary shell commands into this parameter, which are executed on the target infrastructure with the privileges of the execution user.
Product
Red Hat Satellite 6.16 for RHEL 8
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record access.redhat.com access.redhat.com
Oct 1, 2026GraphQL Tools provides utilities for building, stitching, and mocking GraphQL schemas.CVE-2026-103921 · Other software · ardatan · reported by GitHubHigh 7.4
GraphQL Tools provides utilities for building, stitching, and mocking GraphQL schemas. Prior to 1.1.35, the executor-legacy-ws buildWSLegacyExecutor() function hardcodes TLS certificate rejection off for Node.js connections to wss:// endpoints. Applications using the executor directly, or url-loader with SubscriptionProtocol.LEGACY_WS, can therefore accept an attacker-controlled certificate when a network-positioned attacker intercepts the connection. Authentication material in connectionParams or headers can be disclosed, and subscription data can be modified. Browser WebSocket clients are unaffected because browsers enforce certificate validation. This issue is fixed in version 1.1.35.
Product
graphql-tools
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 1, 2026Mamunur Rashid Review Schema review-schema: Missing AuthorizationCVE-2026-97280 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.5
Missing Authorization vulnerability in Mamunur Rashid Review Schema review-schema allows Exploiting Incorrectly Configured Access Control Security Levels. This issue affects Review Schema: 3.1.0.
Product
Mamunur Rashid Review Schema review-schema
What to do
Update Mamunur Rashid Review Schema review-schema to the newest version.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com
Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions before 6.62.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in staff invite acceptance that allows users to specify any email address when creatCVE-2026-103267 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Ghost versions before 6.62.0 contain an authentication bypass vulnerability in staff invite acceptance that allows users to specify any email address when creating their account. Attackers can accept leaked invite tokens with attacker-controlled email addresses, or legitimate recipients can register with unintended email providers.
Product
Ghost
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 30, 2026Newsletter – Send awesome emails from: Insufficiently Protected CredentialsCVE-2026-92537 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.3
The Newsletter – Send awesome emails from WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insufficiently Protected Credentials in all versions up to, and including, 9.3.9 The plugin's public click-tracking REST route `/tnp/l/` is registered with `permission_callback => '__return_true'` and, upon receiving a valid keyed-MD5 signature, calls `set_user_cookie()`, which emits a `Set-Cookie: newsletter=<id>-<raw_token>` response header to the requester because the subscriber object loaded via `get_user()` lacks the `_trusted` property, causing `get_user_key()` to return the raw token column value instead of its MD5-masked variant. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who obtain any signed click-tracking URL for a target subscriber to receive that subscriber's permanent raw authentication cookie, which they can then use to export the subscriber's full PII record via the JSON profile-export endpoint (`?na=px`), rewrite the subscriber's stored profile (`?na=ps`), and silently unsubscribe the subscriber via the RFC-8058 one-click endpoint (`?na=ocu`), none of which require a nonce, password, or email challenge. Signed tracking URLs are embedded in every external link of ever
Product
Newsletter – Send awesome emails from
Affected
up to 9.3.9
What to do
Affects up to 9.3.9. Update Newsletter – Send awesome emails from to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 30, 2026DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter.CVE-2026-103591 · Other software · AsyncFuncAI · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
DeepWiki-Open through commit d92819a contains an unauthenticated arbitrary file read vulnerability in the GET /codemap/file endpoint via the repo_url parameter. Attackers can supply a non-URL repo_url value to bypass path containment checks and read any file accessible to the API process by specifying absolute file paths.
Product
deepwiki-open
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to.CVE-2026-102149 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.4
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to. This could allow an attacker to associate a certificate with another user's account, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of that account's encrypted mail and, where certificate-based login is enabled, potentially permitting unauthorized access to the account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrCVE-2026-102146 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expenCVE-2026-102144 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 5.3
A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expensive server-side operation, causing a partial denial of service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handlCVE-2026-102143 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a partyCVE-2026-102139 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a party to the package being requested. An authenticated user of that optional feature could read the subject, message body, and attachments of packages they neither sent nor received.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that CVE-2026-102135 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.6
On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing code execution as the gateway service account. Replication is disabled by default, and exploitation requires control of a trusted cluster peer or administrative access to the appliance.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied.CVE-2026-102131 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the applicatioCVE-2026-102130 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authCVE-2026-102128 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references.CVE-2026-102127 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7
An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outsidCVE-2026-102119 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the appCVE-2026-102116 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deseriaCVE-2026-102108 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service.CVE-2026-102106 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution.CVE-2026-102097 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an authenticated administrator to import configuration whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted submission could potentially allow arbitrary commands to be executed on the affected gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing CVE-2026-102094 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing pipeline could load from an imported rule configuration. An authenticated administrator with mail-rule configuration privileges could cause the gateway to load and execute code beyond the approved set of mail-processing components, potentially in the context of the mail-gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticatedCVE-2026-102089 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticated administrator to write files to arbitrary locations on the server. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Yonyou U8 CRM before V16.5 and V18 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in /ajax/getemaildata.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass autheCVE-2023-54403 · Other software · Yonyou · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Yonyou U8 CRM before V16.5 and V18 contains an arbitrary file read vulnerability in /ajax/getemaildata.php that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass authentication using the DontCheckLogin=1 parameter and read arbitrary files via an unvalidated filePath parameter. Attackers can exploit this flaw to read sensitive files outside the web application directory, including configuration files containing database or service credentials. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2023-10-14.
Product
U8 CRM
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 30, 2026Contributor PHP Object Injection in Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP <= 1.66 versions.CVE-2026-97291 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Contributor PHP Object Injection in Schema & Structured Data for WP & AMP <= 1.66 versions.
Affected
up to 1.66
What to do
Affects up to 1.66. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record patchstack.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.