Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9,136 results · page 6 of 183
Oct 2, 2026Wallstreet: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVE-2026-39718 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Webriti Wallstreet wallstreet allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Wallstreet: from n/a through 2.8.6.
- Product
- Wallstreet
- Affected
- up to 2.8.6
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.8.6. Update Wallstreet to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Oct 2, 2026Server-side request forgery in the tool server and remote agent connection handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtCVE-2026-103958 · Other software · AWS · reported by ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5High 8.3
Server-side request forgery in the tool server and remote agent connection handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the credentials of the application's own container role and to read responses from arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted connection address supplied when registering, updating or testing a tool server or remote agent. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later.
- Product
- loom
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaws.amazon.comgithub.com
Oct 2, 2026Server-side request forgery in the OAuth2 discovery handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the access token ofCVE-2026-103957 · Other software · AWS · reported by ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5High 8.2
Server-side request forgery in the OAuth2 discovery handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the access token of another user of the deployment and to cause the application to issue requests to arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted discovery document address supplied when registering a tool server or remote agent configured for delegated authentication. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later.
- Product
- loom
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaws.amazon.comgithub.com
Oct 2, 2026ThemeREX Addons: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-102797 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.4
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeREX Group ThemeREX Addons trx_addons allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ThemeREX Addons: from n/a through 2.46.0.
- Product
- ThemeREX Addons
- Affected
- up to 2.46.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.46.0. Update ThemeREX Addons to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows page editors to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs via the url parameterCVE-2026-104470 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows page editors to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs via the url parameter of the Bazar valeur action. Attackers can embed the action with a champ parameter in wiki markup to reach loopback or internal services and partially read responses rendered into the page.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make server-side GET requests by supplying anCVE-2026-104464 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.8
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make server-side GET requests by supplying an unvalidated actor URL to the Bazar abonnements sync action. Attackers can target internal hosts or cloud metadata endpoints and chain attacker-controlled outbox first/next links, with fetched responses stored as readable Bazar entries.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger server requests by sending signed FolCVE-2026-104463 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger server requests by sending signed Follow activities to the public forms actor inbox route. Attackers sign requests with their own keyId while supplying internal actor URLs in the body, reaching internal hosts or cloud metadata via blind GET and POST requests.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in WebfingerService that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger HTTPS requests toCVE-2026-104459 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in WebfingerService that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger HTTPS requests to internal hosts. Attackers can POST a crafted actor_handle with a numeric host and port to the abonnements view to probe internal HTTPS services and ports.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in validateKeyIdUrl() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the SSRF guard uCVE-2026-104458 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in validateKeyIdUrl() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the SSRF guard using 6to4, NAT64, or IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses. Attackers can send a crafted Signature keyId to the public actor inbox route to reach cloud metadata, loopback services, or internal hosts.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admintag action that allows attackers to delete tag associations by luring adminCVE-2026-104453 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admintag action that allows attackers to delete tag associations by luring administrators to crafted GET links. Attackers can supply a wide id range in the delete_tag parameter via top-level navigation, carrying the SameSite=Lax admin cookie, to bulk-delete tag triples.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the filemanager page handler, which deletes page attachments on GET requests withoutCVE-2026-104452 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the filemanager page handler, which deletes page attachments on GET requests without validating a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in page owner or administrator into a top-level GET navigation with do=del, erase, or emptytrash, deleting or permanently purging the page's attachments.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in RevisionsHandler that allows attackers to restore old page revisions through GET reqCVE-2026-104451 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in RevisionsHandler that allows attackers to restore old page revisions through GET requests lacking CSRF token validation. Attackers can lure write-capable users into a top-level navigation with the restoreRevisionId parameter, silently overwriting current page content with stale or vandalized revisions.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the ajaxdeletepage handler, which permanently deletes a page on any GET request carrCVE-2026-104448 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the ajaxdeletepage handler, which permanently deletes a page on any GET request carrying a jsonp_callback parameter without checking a CSRF token. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator or page owner to a crafted link to delete arbitrary pages along with their ACLs, links, triples, comments and referrers.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the autoupdate UpdateAction that allows attackers to delete installed packages via uCVE-2026-104447 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the autoupdate UpdateAction that allows attackers to delete installed packages via unprotected GET requests. Attackers can lure a logged-in administrator to a crafted link with action=delete and a package parameter to remove extensions like bazar, breaking core site functionality.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic trCVE-2026-104443 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an empty-filter scope bypass in the triples delete API that allows any authenticated user to delete or forge arbitrary semantic triples regardless of ownership. Attackers can send an empty filter to the triples delete endpoint to remove the admins-group membership triple, emptying the admin group and causing a site-wide authorization lockout.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs CVE-2026-104442 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a syndication action through the render handler's content parameter. Attackers can target internal hosts and ports, read back fetched feed content in the rendered page, and cause feed enclosures to be downloaded into the files directory.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary hostsCVE-2026-104441 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary hosts and ports via the {{valeur}} action's url parameter. Attackers can submit the action through the content parameter of handlers/page/render.php to probe internal HTTP services and read back response content matching fiche markup.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make arbitrary server-side requests viaCVE-2026-104440 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make arbitrary server-side requests via the idtypeannonce parameter of /api/entries/bazarlist. Because isValidURL() always returns true, attackers can supply internal URLs fetched by curl in loadURLContent() to probe internal networks and reach internal services or metadata endpoints.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc.CVE-2026-80464 · Other software · HAVELSAN Inc. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trMedium 4.9
Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Sef - AI Chatbot Platform: before 2.1. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.
- Product
- Sef - AI Chatbot Platform
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 1, 2026Lektor 3.3.14 and 3.4.0b15 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admin API blueprint that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform stateCVE-2026-104059 · Other software · lektor · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7
Lektor 3.3.14 and 3.4.0b15 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the admin API blueprint that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions by sending cross-origin requests without CSRF tokens, Origin/Referer validation, CORS configuration, or Host allowlisting. Attackers can exploit the newattachment, deleterecord, build, clean, and publish endpoints from a malicious web page to write arbitrary files, delete pages, wipe build output, trigger deployment publication, and via DNS rebinding reach read endpoints to disclose data.
- Product
- lektor
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgist.github.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026Memberful - Membership: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVE-2026-103067 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Memberful Memberful - Membership Plugin memberful-wp allows Cross Site Request Forgery.This issue affects Memberful - Membership Plugin: from n/a through 1.81.0.
- Product
- Memberful - Membership
- Affected
- up to 1.81.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.81.0. Update Memberful - Membership to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Oct 1, 2026Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in feishu-auth and dingtalk-auth plugins in Apache APISIX.CVE-2026-94220 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgLow 2.1
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in feishu-auth and dingtalk-auth plugins in Apache APISIX. An attacker who can get a user to click a crafted link may cause that user's browser session on a protected route to be established under the attacker's identity instead of their own. Any work the user then performs in that session, including uploads, form submissions, and account bindings, lands in the attacker's account. This issue affects Apache APISIX: from 3.17.0 through 3.18.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.19.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache APISIX
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orgopenwall.com
Oct 1, 2026Budibase through 3.41.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in AI table generation because the uploadUrl function in packages/server/src/utilitCVE-2026-103757 · Other software · Budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Budibase through 3.41.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in AI table generation because the uploadUrl function in packages/server/src/utilities/fileUtils.ts uses raw node-fetch instead of fetchWithBlacklist. Authenticated builder users can send a prompt to POST /api/ai/tables that places an internal URL in an attachment column, causing the server to fetch it and return a presigned object-storage URL containing the response, such as cloud metadata credentials.
- Product
- budibase
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions from 3.20.2 before 6.51.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in image dimension refetching that allows authenticated staff usersCVE-2026-103291 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Ghost versions from 3.20.2 before 6.51.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in image dimension refetching that allows authenticated staff users to trigger outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. Attackers can point image cards at attacker-controlled hosts or internal network endpoints to access metadata services and internal resources unavailable from the public internet.
- Product
- Ghost
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions 1.18.0 before 6.27.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the webhooks feature that allows staff users to probe internal hosts.CVE-2026-103287 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
Ghost versions 1.18.0 before 6.27.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the webhooks feature that allows staff users to probe internal hosts. Attackers with staff privileges can craft webhook requests to access internal network resources from the Ghost server.
- Product
- Ghost
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions from 5.19.0 before 6.57.1 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the post feedback functionality that allows attackers to submit fCVE-2026-103285 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Ghost versions from 5.19.0 before 6.57.1 contain a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the post feedback functionality that allows attackers to submit feedback on behalf of logged-in users. Attackers can craft a malicious link to the feedback page that automatically submits feedback when visited by authenticated members without their knowledge or consent.
- Product
- Ghost
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-103082 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LA-Studio LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor lastudio-element-kit allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor: from n/a through 1.6.2.
- Product
- LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor
- Affected
- up to 1.6.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.6.2. Update LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Oct 1, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of alert commands via sequential, unvalidated GET requests when an authenticated adCVE-2026-34190 · Other software · Pandora FMS · reported by security@pandorafms.comMedium 5.9
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of alert commands via sequential, unvalidated GET requests when an authenticated administrator visits a malicious page. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 onwards.
- Product
- Pandora FMS
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 1, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of event responses via a forged GET request when an authenticated administrator visCVE-2026-34189 · Other software · Pandora FMS · reported by security@pandorafms.comMedium 5.9
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability allows unauthorized deletion of event responses via a forged GET request when an authenticated administrator visits a malicious page. This issue affects Pandora FMS: from 777 onwards.
- Product
- Pandora FMS
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the sCVE-2026-102091 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the server issue arbitrary outbound network requests and read back the responses. This could potentially be used to reach internal-only services or other network-restricted resources.
- Product
- Secure Data Forms
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs bCVE-2023-54402 · Other software · iDocView · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a hardcoded default token value (testtoken) to bypass authentication. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted URL scheme handling, including file:// URIs, to read arbitrary local files such as operating-system and application configuration files, and to reach internal network hosts and services not otherwise accessible. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-26.
- Product
- iDocView
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordblog.csdn.netgithub.com
Sep 30, 2026OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation eCVE-2026-101883 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation enforced by canvas.navigate. Attackers with gateway or agent access can issue canvas.present to make the node's WebView send requests to localhost, private networks, or tailnet services from the user's machine.
- Product
- OpenClaw Windows Node
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 30, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Razorpay Payment Links for WooCommerce <= 2.1.5 versions.CVE-2026-97299 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Razorpay Payment Links for WooCommerce <= 2.1.5 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.1.5
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.1.5. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 30, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Blacklist Manager – WooCommerce Anti-Fraud, Blacklist & Checkout Verification <= 2.3.1 versions.CVE-2026-96838 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Blacklist Manager – WooCommerce Anti-Fraud, Blacklist & Checkout Verification <= 2.3.1 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.3.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.3.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 30, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Photo Gallery by Supsystic <= 1.21.0 versions.CVE-2026-102399 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Photo Gallery by Supsystic <= 1.21.0 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.21.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.21.0. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 30, 2026An authentication bypass in the DOM security processor in Apache WSS4J allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge authenticated SOAP messages via a crafteCVE-2026-88920 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.8
An authentication bypass in the DOM security processor in Apache WSS4J allows unauthenticated remote attackers to forge authenticated SOAP messages via a crafted unsigned SAML sender-vouches assertion containing an attacker-controlled key. Users are recommended to upgrade to versions 4.0.2 or 3.0.6 or 2.4.4, which fix this issue.
- Product
- Apache WSS4J
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orgopenwall.com
Sep 29, 2026basecamp/upright at commit efe4f2e5254ac6e57e45d2261804cca74dbbca3f contains a login cross-site request forgery issue in the static credentials callback.CVE-2026-67993 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.8
basecamp/upright at commit efe4f2e5254ac6e57e45d2261804cca74dbbca3f contains a login cross-site request forgery issue in the static credentials callback.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026ClaraVerse through 0.3.1 contains server-side request forgery protection bypasses in the download_file and scrape_web agent tools.CVE-2026-102879 · Other software · claraverse-space · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
ClaraVerse through 0.3.1 contains server-side request forgery protection bypasses in the download_file and scrape_web agent tools. Authenticated users can bypass hostname validation and IPv6 transition address filtering to make the server request internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints.
- Product
- ClaraVerse
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026Fider before 0.38.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability due to a time-of-check time-of-use gap in URL validation for webhooks and custom OAuth CVE-2026-102877 · Other software · getfider · reported by VulnCheckLow 2.1
Fider before 0.38.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability due to a time-of-check time-of-use gap in URL validation for webhooks and custom OAuth provider endpoints. Administrators controlling DNS can perform DNS rebinding attacks to make the Fider server send requests to internal services or cloud metadata endpoints.
- Product
- fider
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026Cross-site request forgery in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin poliCVE-2026-95362 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8
Cross-site request forgery in DevTools in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker leveraging social engineering to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
- Product
- Chrome
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordchromereleases.googleblog.comissues.chromium.org
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-73597 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.5
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Launch of phishing attacks, and Protection mechanism bypass.
- Product
- Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026Quick.Cart is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in admin config panel.CVE-2026-41875 · Other software · OpenSolution · reported by cvd@cert.plMedium 6.9
Quick.Cart is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in admin config panel. Malicious attacker can craft special website, which when visited by the admin, will automatically send a POST request that changes admin's login and password. This software does implement simple protection against this type of attack, but it is easily bypassed by manipulating the referer header. All forms available in this software are potentially vulnerable. This issue was fixed in a patch to version 6.7 published on 09.11.2026, deployments without this patch are still vulnerable
- Product
- Quick.Cart
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcert.plopensolution.org
Sep 28, 2026Cotonti through 1.0.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in admin.users.php that allows attackers to delete user groups without token verificatCVE-2026-101093 · Other software · Cotonti · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Cotonti through 1.0.0 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in admin.users.php that allows attackers to delete user groups without token verification. Attackers can craft malicious links or pages that trick authenticated administrators into deleting custom groups and their associated permissions by riding the administrator's session.
- Product
- Cotonti
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 28, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Apache Roller 6.1.5 allows a remote attacker to cause a logged-in user to perform state-changing actions under the victim'sCVE-2026-82380 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.1
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Apache Roller 6.1.5 allows a remote attacker to cause a logged-in user to perform state-changing actions under the victim's authority, because the CSRF validation filters accept a request that does not submit the required salt token, validating instead against a value the server itself generated for the request. No optional feature or non-default configuration is required; any logged-in author or administrator is affected when induced to visit a crafted page. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Roller 6.1.6 or later, which validates only the submitted salt and applies the same check to multipart forms.
- Product
- Apache Roller
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comlists.apache.org
Sep 28, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache Roller 6.1.5 allows an authenticated user with entry-editing rights on a weblog to cause outbound HTTP requests to CVE-2026-82375 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 7.4
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Apache Roller 6.1.5 allows an authenticated user with entry-editing rights on a weblog to cause outbound HTTP requests to attacker-chosen destinations through legacy outbound Trackback and entry enclosure handling. The Trackback control is hidden in the standard UI, but its action remains directly reachable; the enclosure path is relevant only when an author supplies an enclosure URL. No non-default server configuration is required, and the default empty Trackback allow-list permits all destinations. Requests can reach loopback and private-network addresses, while enclosure handling exposes response status, content type, and length. Users are recommended to upgrade to Apache Roller 6.1.6 or later, which removes the outbound trackback action and stops dereferencing enclosure URLs.
- Product
- Apache Roller
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.