Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
7,412 results · page 6 of 149
Oct 5, 2026In multiple functions of VirtualAudioControllerTest.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code.CVE-2026-58841 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comHigh 7.8
In multiple functions of VirtualAudioControllerTest.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In setPermissionGrantState of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to improper input validation.CVE-2026-58834 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comMedium 5.5
In setPermissionGrantState of DevicePolicyManagerService.java, there is a possible persistent denial of service due to improper input validation. This could lead to local denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check.CVE-2026-55265 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comMedium 6.5
In multiple functions of PduParser.java, there is a possible out of bounds read due to a missing bounds check. This could lead to a remote denial of service with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible sandbox escape due to a missing permission check.CVE-2026-45524 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comHigh 8.8
In isSystem of WifiPermissionsUtil.java, there is a possible sandbox escape due to a missing permission check. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In updateState of DeviceAdminAppsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code.CVE-2026-28647 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comHigh 7.8
In updateState of DeviceAdminAppsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In shouldDisableUninstallButton of ApplicationActionButtonsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code.CVE-2026-28641 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comHigh 7.8
In shouldDisableUninstallButton of ApplicationActionButtonsPreferenceController.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to a logic error in the code. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026In checkCallerIsCertInstallerOrSelfInProfile of CredentialStorageActivity.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation.CVE-2026-28640 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by security@android.comHigh 7.8
In checkCallerIsCertInstallerOrSelfInProfile of CredentialStorageActivity.java, there is a possible permission bypass due to improper input validation. This could lead to local escalation of privilege with no additional execution privileges needed. User interaction is not needed for exploitation.
- Product
- Android
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026adm-zip is a JavaScript library for creating and extracting ZIP archives in Node.js.CVE-2026-102282 · Other software · cthackers · reported by GitHubHigh 7.1
adm-zip is a JavaScript library for creating and extracting ZIP archives in Node.js. Prior to 0.6.1, adm-zip applies the Unix permission bits stored in a zip entry directly to the extracted file via `fs.chmodSync()` when `keepOriginalPermission=true` is passed to `extractAllTo()`/`extractEntryTo()` — and it never filters the setuid/setgid/sticky bits out of those bits. A zip crafted by an attacker can therefore produce an extracted binary with mode `04755`. When extraction runs as root (the default posture in Docker builds, CI runners, and privileged install steps — the exact environments where this flag is used), the resulting root-owned setuid file is executed later by a lesser-privileged user, turning the attacker's code into a root execution. Version 0.6.1 fixes the issue.
- Product
- adm-zip
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026The email media type OAuth form passes the Authorization endpoint value to window.open() without validating the URL scheme, so a javascript: URL is executed in CVE-2026-59788 · Other software · Zabbix · reported by security@zabbix.comMedium 5.7
The email media type OAuth form passes the Authorization endpoint value to window.open() without validating the URL scheme, so a javascript: URL is executed in the browser. This means a crafted media type configuration, deliverable as an import file, runs arbitrary JavaScript as the Super Admin who grants consent.
- Product
- Zabbix
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026The JavaScript preprocessing (Duktape) engine on Zabbix server has a vulnerability where a limited administrator is able to read raw heap data potentially resulCVE-2026-59782 · Other software · Zabbix · reported by security@zabbix.comMedium 6.9
The JavaScript preprocessing (Duktape) engine on Zabbix server has a vulnerability where a limited administrator is able to read raw heap data potentially resulting in leaked data from other running preprocessors not available to said administrator.
- Product
- Zabbix
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026DigitalCanion has discovered a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows an authenticated malicious user to inject persistent JavaScript or HTCVE-2026-104808 · Email & office · Mitel · reported by vulnerability@ncsc.chLow 1.9
DigitalCanion has discovered a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows an authenticated malicious user to inject persistent JavaScript or HTML content, resulting in a denial-of-service condition within the web application. The specific flaw exists within the web portal listening on TCP port 443, under Configuration → Users → Users List. The vulnerability occurs in the “Microsoft Exchange mailbox” field, which fails to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied input before storing and rendering it. By injecting malicious JavaScript into this field, an attacker can cause the payload to execute whenever the affected user properties are accessed. This can prevent access to the affected user properties and result in a denial-of-service condition within the application's user-management functionality.
- Product
- Mitel MiVoice Office 400
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026DigitalCanion has discovered a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows an authenticated malicious user to inject persistent JavaScript or HTCVE-2026-104807 · Email & office · Mitel · reported by vulnerability@ncsc.chLow 1.9
DigitalCanion has discovered a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that allows an authenticated malicious user to inject persistent JavaScript or HTML content into the web application. The specific flaw exists within the web portal listening on TCP port 443, under Configuration → Domains, specifically in the “Description” field. The application fails to properly validate or sanitize user-supplied input before storing and subsequently rendering the field. By injecting malicious JavaScript into the Description field, an attacker can modify the content and behavior of the affected page when it is viewed by other users. This could allow an attacker to alter the page's appearance, display attacker-controlled content, or construct convincing phishing scenarios within the application's trusted web context.
- Product
- Mitel MiVoice Office 400
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026Perforce P4 Search container images prior to 2026.4.2 enable an unauthenticated Java debug interface.CVE-2026-100102 · Other software · Perforce · reported by security@puppet.comCritical 9.5
Perforce P4 Search container images prior to 2026.4.2 enable an unauthenticated Java debug interface. An attacker with network access to this interface can execute arbitrary code as the P4 Search service account, potentially leading to compromise of the connected P4 Server.
- Product
- P4 (Helix Core)
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 5, 2026A vulnerability was detected in linlinjava litemall up to 1.8.0.CVE-2026-105237 · Other software · linlinjava · reported by VulDBLow 2.9
A vulnerability was detected in linlinjava litemall up to 1.8.0. This affects an unknown part of the file litemall-admin-api/src/main/java/org/linlinjava/litemall/admin/web/AdminAuthController.java of the component Login Endpoint. The manipulation results in improper restriction of excessive authentication attempts. The attack may be performed from remote. A high complexity level is associated with this attack. It is indicated that the exploitability is difficult. The exploit is now public and may be used. The project was informed of the problem early through an issue report but has not responded yet.
- Product
- litemall
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the raw JCA provider's legacy PBES1 (PKCS#5 scheme 1) and PKCS#12 PBE families ran their password-based key derivation wiCVE-2026-97873 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Medium 5.3
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the raw JCA provider's legacy PBES1 (PKCS#5 scheme 1) and PKCS#12 PBE families ran their password-based key derivation with an iteration count taken from untrusted input without bounding it, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before anything could be verified. The AlgorithmParameters implementations (PKCS12PBE and its object identifier aliases, and PBKDF1) accepted any count from an encoded PKCS12PBEParams or PBEParameter, narrowing a value beyond the int range with intValue(), and every Cipher, Mac and SecretKeyFactory in these families derived with whatever count it was given, including one decoded by another provider's AlgorithmParameters, as when javax.crypto.EncryptedPrivateKeyInfo.getKeySpec() decrypts a PKCS#12 PBE-protected private key with BC. Both the parameter parse and the derivations now reject a negative or over-limit count under the org.bouncycastle.pbe.max_iteration_count property (default 10,000,000) that already bounded PBKDF2 (CVE-2026-17508), and the parse rejects a count beyond the int range rather than narrowing it. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, a truncated OpenPGP encrypted message was accepted with no error reported, and on the SEIPD version 1 path with no integrCVE-2026-85515 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, a truncated OpenPGP encrypted message was accepted with no error reported, and on the SEIPD version 1 path with no integrity check performed at all. RFC 9580 sec. 13.7 permits an implementation to release the cleartext of the fully authenticated chunks when streaming but requires it to indicate a clear error as soon as the truncation is detected, and to report suspect integrity when it discovers malleable ciphertext. The truncation was detected and then discarded: when a message is truncated but the length field of the enclosing packet is left unchanged, BCPGInputStream.PartialInputStream raises an EOFException for the missing ciphertext, and BCPGInputStream.nextPacketTag() reports an EOFException as a clean end of message, so the packet stream above it stopped as though no packets remained. On the AEAD path (SEIPD version 2 and the version 5 AEAD packet), when the literal data packet ended on an AEAD chunk boundary and the consumer read in increments smaller than one chunk, the look-ahead for the packet after the literal triggered the truncated chunk read, so BcAEADUtil and JceAEADUtil never reached the trailing message tag of sec. 5.13.2 tha
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySiCVE-2026-71892 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Medium 6.9
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the opt-in key-size validation on CMS key-transport recipients, org.bouncycastle.cms.jcajce.JceKeyTransRecipient.setKeySizeValidation(true), never ran for a message using RFC 9709 content-encryption key derivation (id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256). The branch that should have selected the actual content-encryption algorithm carried in the key derivation AlgorithmIdentifier's parameters compared the encrypted-key byte array against the id-alg-cek-hkdf-sha256 object identifier, a comparison between a byte array and an ASN1ObjectIdentifier that is false for every possible input, so the check fell through to a key-size lookup on the outer wrapper OID. That OID identifies a key-derivation construction rather than a cipher and has no registered key size, so the size comparison was skipped entirely. A key-transport EnvelopedData or AuthEnvelopedData whose transported, HKDF-derived content-encryption key did not match the key size of the advertised content-encryption algorithm was therefore accepted even with validation explicitly enabled, silently defeating the only mechanism the API offers for enforcing recovered key size. The recipient now dispatches on the
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, BLS12_381BasicScheme.keyValidate, and so BLSPublicKeyParameters and every BasicScheme, MessageAugmentation and ProofOfPosCVE-2026-71891 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 7.1
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, BLS12_381BasicScheme.keyValidate, and so BLSPublicKeyParameters and every BasicScheme, MessageAugmentation and ProofOfPossession verify and aggregateVerify that gate on it, accepted a public key built on a foreign ECCurve that merely shares BLS12-381's field characteristic. The prime-order subgroup check trusts a point's own curve to name its cofactor, since ECPoint.satisfiesOrder returns true outright when the curve's cofactor is one, so a point on a curve with a different equation and a cofactor forged to one passed keyValidate despite not being a G1 point at all. In BC's pairing implementation such a point contributes the identity in the target group, so an aggregate signature verified against a set of public keys including it is accepted even though it contains no signature for that key and message pair, admitting a phantom signer. keyValidate now first confirms that the point's curve carries exactly the canonical G1 field, equation, order and cofactor before any subgroup check. The issue is reachable only where an application constructs an ECPoint on an explicit, non-canonical curve and accepts it as an authority-bearing key; the standard
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, validation of an MLS (RFC 9420) external commit's proposal list, org.bouncycastle.mls.protocol.Group.validateExternalCachCVE-2026-71890 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, validation of an MLS (RFC 9420) external commit's proposal list, org.bouncycastle.mls.protocol.Group.validateExternalCachedProposals, counted the proposals by type and bounded the removed leaf index but never established that the removed leaf had anything to do with the joiner. RFC 9420 sec. 12.2 permits at most one Remove proposal in an external commit, with which the joiner removes an old version of themselves, and requires that where one is present the LeafNode in the commit's path field meet the criteria it would have to meet in an Update for the removed leaf, in particular that its credential present identifiers acceptable for the removed participant. The ordinary proposal-list validator's self-remove rule is deliberately not applied on this path, because a resync commit legitimately removes a leaf the joiner owns, but nothing was put in its place. Any party holding the group's public GroupInfo, which is precisely what an external joiner is meant to be given, could therefore commit a Remove naming any member's LeafIndex and have every member apply it, evicting that member and taking over their slot in the ratchet tree. The credential chec
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.CVE-2026-71889 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, neither copy of PKIXCertPathReviewer - org.bouncycastle.pkix.jcajce.PKIXCertPathReviewer nor the legacy org.bouncycastle.x509.PKIXCertPathReviewer - applied X.509 name constraints to the end-entity certificate. checkNameConstraints walked the path with a loop bound of index greater than zero, which is the bound the CA-only steps require, but index zero is the target certificate under the standard CertPath ordering, so the permitted and excluded subtree checks of RFC 5280 sec. 6.1.3 (b) and (c) never ran against the leaf's subject DN or its subjectAltName. A chain whose leaf violated a NameConstraints extension imposed by its own issuing CA therefore reported isValidCertPath() true with an empty error list, while CertPathValidator.getInstance("PKIX", "BC"), which shares no code with the reviewer, rejected the identical chain against the identical trust anchor. An application using the reviewer to make the trust decision rather than for diagnostics alongside a real validation accepted a certificate the constrained CA was never authorised to issue. Both copies now check every certificate in the path including the target, waive the sec. 4.2.1.10 s
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the streaming CMS AuthenticatedData parser accepted a message whose digestAlgorithm and authAttrs fields disagreed about CVE-2026-71888 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the streaming CMS AuthenticatedData parser accepted a message whose digestAlgorithm and authAttrs fields disagreed about whether authenticated attributes were present. RFC 5652 sec. 9.1 pairs the two, requiring that authAttrs be present whenever digestAlgorithm is, and sec. 9.2 makes the MAC cover the DER encoding of authAttrs when they are present and the eContent OCTET STRING directly when they are not. CMSAuthenticatedDataParser has to choose between those two in its constructor, before it can reach authAttrs, which comes later in the SEQUENCE, so it chose on digestAlgorithm alone: for a message with digestAlgorithm absent but authAttrs present it verified the content MAC and then returned the attributes through getAuthAttrs() as though they had been authenticated, when the MAC had never covered them. An attacker able to modify a message in transit could insert an authenticated attribute, such as an RFC 2634 ESSSecurityLabel, into an otherwise valid message while holding neither the key-encryption key nor the content-MAC key, and an application taking an authorization, routing or labelling decision from those attributes would act on attacke
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP API accepted a data signature made by a signing subkey whose Subkey Binding signature carried no eCVE-2026-71887 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP API accepted a data signature made by a signing subkey whose Subkey Binding signature carried no embedded Primary Key Binding (cross-certification) signature, in the case where that binding omits a Key Flags subpacket. RFC 9580 sec. 5.2.1.8 and sec. 10.1.3 require the embedded Primary Key Binding signature on any subkey that can issue signatures; it is the subkey's own statement that it belongs to the primary key it is bound under. OpenPGPCertificate resolved the subkey's key flags two different ways. isSigningKey() goes through getKeyFlags() and getApplyingSubpacket(), which falls back to the primary key's direct-key or primary User ID self-signature when the binding signature omits the subpacket, so the subkey inherited the primary's SIGN_DATA and counted as signing-capable; verifyEmbeddedPrimaryKeyBinding(), which enforces the requirement, reads the binding signature's own hashed subpackets, found no SIGN_DATA there, and returned early as a non-signing key without ever demanding the back signature. The same subkey was therefore signing-capable - so its signatures were attributed to the certificate and OpenPGPSignature
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP certificate API accepted a third-party certification or trust delegation from any component key ofCVE-2026-71886 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the high-level OpenPGP certificate API accepted a third-party certification or trust delegation from any component key of the issuing certificate, without requiring that component to have been granted the authority to certify. OpenPGPCertificate.getCertificationBy() and getDelegationBy() resolve a third-party signature by matching its issuer key identifier against every key of the third-party certificate, then verify the issuing component's binding chain and the signature itself; nothing checked that the issuing component carried the RFC 9580 sec. 5.2.3.29 certification key flag (CERTIFY_OTHER) when the signature was created. A subkey bound only with SIGN_DATA - the online signing subkey of exactly the offline-primary arrangement those key flags exist to express - could therefore issue a positive User ID certification over an attacker-controlled identity, or a full-trust depth-one direct-key delegation of introducer trust, and the API returned it as a valid signature chain attributed to the third-party certificate. An application treating getCertificationBy(...).isValid() or getDelegationBy(...) as an identity or trusted-introducer decision wo
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the Messaging Layer Security (MLS, RFC 9420) implementation did not bind an X.509 credential to a LeafNode's signature_keCVE-2026-71885 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Critical 9.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the Messaging Layer Security (MLS, RFC 9420) implementation did not bind an X.509 credential to a LeafNode's signature_key. LeafNode.verify() checked a leaf's signature against the signature_key carried in the leaf itself, while the credential's X.509 certificate chain was stored but never parsed or validated, so the end-entity certificate's public key was never required to match signature_key as RFC 9420 sec. 5.3 requires. A party could therefore present another party's certificate as its credential while signing the leaf, and the enclosing KeyPackage, with an unrelated key, and be accepted under that other party's identity through KeyPackage.verify() and the Group leaf-validation path. In a deployment that admits external commits without an independent credential-admission check, an unauthenticated attacker could be admitted under a victim's X.509 identity, evict the victim (resynchronization compares whole credentials rather than signing keys), derive the current epoch, decrypt subsequent group messages, and send messages accepted as the victim. TreeKEM.LeafNode now requires the end-entity certificate's subject public key, in the cipher sui
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV released the caller's key, IV and aCVE-2026-71883 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV released the caller's key, IV and additional authenticated data arrays with JNI's ReleaseByteArrayElements in mode 0, which commits the native copy back into the Java array. Those arrays are read-only to the native code, and on a JVM that returns a copy rather than a pin the copy still holds the input bytes as they were read. The output buffer is taken through a separate critical region and committed first, so where an application passed the same Java array as both an input and the destination - encrypting in place over KeyParameter.getKey(), for example - the later mode-0 release of the key wrote the unchanged key bytes over the ciphertext that had just been produced. The call still returned the correct output length, so an application encrypting in place over its own key array was handed the raw AES key where it expected ciphertext, with nothing in the API to indicate it, and would transmit or store the key in place of the message. The read-only input arrays are now released with JNI_ABORT, freeing the native copy without copying it back, and mode 0 is rese
- Product
- BC-LTS-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, HQC leaked secret-derived data through two side channels: its GF(2^8) arithmetic used lookup tables indexed by field elemCVE-2026-18040 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Medium 5.9
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, HQC leaked secret-derived data through two side channels: its GF(2^8) arithmetic used lookup tables indexed by field elements, making the cache line touched a function of the operand, and its fixed-weight support sampler left its duplicate scan as soon as a collision was found and stored accepted positions at a secret index. Both run on secret inputs during encapsulation and decapsulation, and the sampler re-expands the secret key from its seed on every decapsulation, so an attacker able to observe cache behaviour or decapsulation timing can recover information about the HQC private key. The field arithmetic is now table-free and the sampler branch-free within a batch of candidates, with output and randomness consumption unchanged.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026OpenTelemetry JavaScript Contrib provides instrumentation libraries for collecting telemetry from JavaScript applications.CVE-2026-104872 · Other software · open-telemetry · reported by GitHubMedium 5.8
OpenTelemetry JavaScript Contrib provides instrumentation libraries for collecting telemetry from JavaScript applications. Prior to versions 0.66.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-cassandra-driver, 0.65.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-knex, 0.67.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-mongoose, @opentelemetry/instrumentation-mysql, and @opentelemetry/instrumentation-mysql2, 0.46.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-oracledb, 0.73.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-pg, and 0.40.0 of @opentelemetry/instrumentation-tedious, the packages add the database connection username to every instrumented database operation as the db.user span attribute. The attribute is emitted by default and is not controlled by enhancedDatabaseReporting or another opt-in setting. Configured observability backends therefore receive database account names that may expose service topology, role or environment information, and account naming patterns. This issue is fixed in versions 0.66.0, 0.65.0, 0.67.0, 0.46.0, 0.73.0, and 0.40.0 of the respective packages.
- Product
- opentelemetry-js-contrib
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026A code execution issue in the Java integration in Apache OpenOffice v4.1.16 and earlier allows a crafted untrusted document to trigger executing arbitrary (evenCVE-2026-59265 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.8
A code execution issue in the Java integration in Apache OpenOffice v4.1.16 and earlier allows a crafted untrusted document to trigger executing arbitrary (even remote) code when opened by the user. This issue is expected to be fixed in version 4.1.17, which is in the release candidate phase. Until then, users can mitigate this issue by disabling Java runtime integration in the Preferences dialog. This prevents the attack. If this is not possible, or as an extra precaution, you can avoid opening open untrusted files entirely. Once 4.1.17 is released, upgrade to that version to fix the issue.
- Product
- Apache OpenOffice
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026An authenticated LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.4.0 user with the global Surveys: create permission can store a JavaScript-breaking value in the date_min attribCVE-2026-102626 · Other software · LimeSurvey · reported by help@fluidattacks.comHigh 7.2
An authenticated LimeSurvey Community Edition 7.4.0 user with the global Surveys: create permission can store a JavaScript-breaking value in the date_min attribute of a Date/Time question. When another user renders the affected question, LimeSurvey inserts the stored value into a single-quoted inline JavaScript literal without JavaScript-context encoding.
- Product
- LimeSurvey
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordfluidattacks.comgithub.com
Oct 2, 2026Path-traversal vulnerability in QOS.CH Sarl Logback-classic on Java (logback-classic module) allows path-traversal vulnerability.CVE-2026-104721 · Other software · QOS.CH Sarl · reported by vulnerability@ncsc.chMedium 6.3
Path-traversal vulnerability in QOS.CH Sarl Logback-classic on Java (logback-classic module) allows path-traversal vulnerability. More specifically, an MDC-based discriminator value flows unsanitized into a nested FileAppender path, letting an attacker who influences that MDC value (e.g. via an HTTP header) create and append log files outside the intended directory. This issue affects Logback-classic: from 0.9.14 through 1.6.4. This vulnerability is similar to CVE-2026-19880 but involves other attack techniques.
- Product
- Logback-classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift JavaME bindings.CVE-2026-94657 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.2
Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift JavaME bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++, Java, Go, netstd, Python and Delphi bindings.CVE-2026-66055 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.2
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift C++, Java, Go, netstd, Python and Delphi bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings.CVE-2026-61374 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 7.1
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026Memory allocation with excessive size value, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Go, netstd, OCaml, Erlang, JavaCVE-2026-82458 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.7
Memory allocation with excessive size value, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Go, netstd, OCaml, Erlang, JavaME, Rust, C++, Java, Kotlin and D language bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java TSaslNonblockingServer.CVE-2026-61373 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.7
Allocation of Resources Without Limits or Throttling vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java TSaslNonblockingServer. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.5.3 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow remote attackers to inject JavaScript through unsanitized paramCVE-2026-104473 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
YesWiki before 4.5.3 contains multiple reflected cross-site scripting vulnerabilities that allow remote attackers to inject JavaScript through unsanitized parameters such as incomingurl, id, file, tags, and template. Attackers can lure authenticated or unauthenticated users into opening crafted links to hijack sessions and trigger authenticated requests against backend functionality.
- Product
- yeswiki
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 2, 2026improper handling of exceptional conditions, Missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability in Apache Thrift java bindings.CVE-2026-94651 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.2
improper handling of exceptional conditions, Missing release of resource after effective lifetime vulnerability in Apache Thrift java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Thrift Dart and Java ME bindings.CVE-2026-85493 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.7
Uncontrolled Recursion vulnerability in Apache Thrift Dart and Java ME bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindinCVE-2026-94639 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.2
improper handling of exceptional conditions, Allocation of resources without limits or throttling, Uncaught exception vulnerability in Apache Thrift Java bindings. This issue affects Apache Thrift: before 0.25.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.25.0, which fixes the issue.
- Product
- Apache Thrift
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orglists.apache.org
Oct 2, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately divisionCVE-2026-18036 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, NTRU reduced secret values with the % operator in three helpers whose reference implementations are deliberately division-free, so each reduction was carried out by an integer division whose latency depends on the secret operand. Polynomial.modQ divided by a variable divisor, which a compiler cannot strength-reduce to a multiply the way it can a constant one, so it emitted a division on every call including on the decapsulation path where the dividend derives from the private key; Polynomial.mod3 and NTRUSampling.mod3 divided the secret key polynomials f and g during key generation, the message polynomials r and m during encapsulation, and coefficients recovered during decapsulation. An attacker able to measure that timing can recover information about the NTRU private key. modQ now masks, which is exact because q is always a power of two, and mod3 uses the reference implementation's division-free fold and select; the results are unchanged.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being CVE-2026-17508 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Medium 5.3
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, several password-based key derivation entry points ran the KDF with cost parameters taken from the untrusted input being processed, without bounding them, so a small input could dictate an arbitrary amount of work before any password or integrity check could reject it. The affected paths are the RFC 9579 PBMAC1 MAC calculator builders, which took the PBKDF2 iteration count and derived-key length straight out of PBMAC1Params (JcePBMac1CalculatorBuilder, and PKCS12PBEUtils.createPBMac1Calculator reached from PKCS12PfxPdu.isMacValid); the scrypt parallelization parameter p in the PKCS#8 and PKCS#12 cost guards, which bounded only the cost parameter N and the block size r even though the scratch buffer scales with r times p, so the configured memory ceiling could be evaded entirely; the raw JCA PBKDF2 provider (org.bouncycastle.jcajce.provider.symmetric.PBEPBKDF2); and the bcrypt round count read from an encrypted OpenSSH v1 private key's own kdfoptions. Each now bounds the parameter before deriving, in line with the caps already applied elsewhere in the tree, with the OpenSSH round count configurable through the new org.bouncycastle.openssh.max_r
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation (org.bouncycastle.mls) holds RFC 9420's uint32 leaf_index in a signed int, so a wire value with thCVE-2026-17507 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, the MLS implementation (org.bouncycastle.mls) holds RFC 9420's uint32 leaf_index in a signed int, so a wire value with the top bit set decodes to a negative number. That is a legitimate encoding rather than malformed input, and it must still decode, since the MLS interop test vectors round-trip the full range. GroupKeySet.SecretTree.hasLeaf and Group.validateRemove compared the decoded value directly against the tree's leaf count, and a signed comparison treats any negative int as less than a positive bound, so an out-of-range sender passed the membership check. In the hasLeaf case the SenderData of an unprotected PrivateMessage could then drive LeafIndex.directPath through NodeIndex.parent() arithmetic that never reaches the tree root, growing the resulting node list without bound until the JVM exhausted its heap. A single small message from any current group member could therefore deny service to every other member of the group. Both comparisons now interpret the value as unsigned via Integer.toUnsignedLong, rejecting an out-of-range sender however it was encoded; well-formed leaf indices are unaffected.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 1, 2026figlet.js is a FIG driver written in JavaScript that aims to implement the FIGfont specification.CVE-2026-96780 · Other software · patorjk · reported by GitHubHigh 8.2
figlet.js is a FIG driver written in JavaScript that aims to implement the FIGfont specification. Prior to 1.11.3, text() and textSync() can enter an unbounded loop when whitespaceBreak is enabled and width is smaller than the rendered width of a single FIGlet character. Under these conditions, breakWord() cannot find a valid break point and returns without consuming a character, so generateFigTextLines() repeatedly processes the same input while consuming CPU and growing memory. The non-default option and attacker-controlled width must both reach an affected call. This issue is fixed in version 1.11.3.
- Product
- figlet.js
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 1, 2026Joyland AI app allows an attacker with shared network access to inject JavaScript into content loaded in WebView.CVE-2026-102667 · Other software · Joyland · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9
Joyland AI app allows an attacker with shared network access to inject JavaScript into content loaded in WebView. Without user-granted permissions, an attacker could access the clipboard, make arbitrary HTTP requests via the Weex 'stream' module, or access app-internal storage. If the installed app has been granted permissions previously, the attacker can access the entire file system, camera, microphone, and GPS tracking.
- Product
- Joyland.ai
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordraw.githubusercontent.comcve.org
Oct 1, 2026KaTeX is a fast, easy-to-use JavaScript library for TeX math rendering on the web.CVE-2026-103923 · Other software · KaTeX · reported by GitHubLow 2.1
KaTeX is a fast, easy-to-use JavaScript library for TeX math rendering on the web. From 0.11.0 until 0.18.2, KaTeX uses ordinary JavaScript property access for the renderer options object, the trust setting, default and processor setting metadata, and namespace lookup and group restoration, allowing inherited properties to be treated as explicitly supplied values. When Object.prototype is already polluted or an attacker controls the options object's prototype, attacker-controlled mathematical expressions can use an inherited trust value to enable trusted rendering and produce links capable of user-interaction cross-site scripting or loading attacker-selected external resources in a consuming application that inserts unsanitized KaTeX output into a page. KaTeX does not itself create the prototype pollution, and rendering an expression alone does not execute script. This issue is fixed in version 0.18.2.
- Product
- KaTeX
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 1, 2026CVE-2026-7175: the Business Name parameter in the /promoters/edit endpoint of the My Profile section of a promoter’s profile, which allows the injection of JavaCVE-2026-7175 · Other software · Crocantickets · reported by cve-coordination@incibe.esMedium 4.8
CVE-2026-7175: the Business Name parameter in the /promoters/edit endpoint of the My Profile section of a promoter’s profile, which allows the injection of JavaScript code that will execute on the promoter’s public page;
- Product
- Entradium
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 30, 2026Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH.CVE-2026-93994 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.1
Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. SSH servers can be configured to require multi-authentication schemes, for instance two different public keys, not just one. In OpenSSH, this would be done by setting in sshd_config AuthenticationMethods "publickey,publickey". Apache MINA SSHD provides an equivalent configuration mechanism. In Apache MINA SSHD versions up to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5 the server code in component sshd-core does not enforce that the two public keys presented are different. A user can thus successfully authenticate with only one of the two key pairs required by presenting this single key twice. This is a partial authentication bypass. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue.
- Product
- Apache MINA SSHD
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orgopenwall.com
Sep 30, 2026Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value, Allocation of Resources Without Limits, and Uncontrolled Recursion in the Java implementation of Apache PLC4X (PLC4CVE-2026-102509 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 8.7
Memory Allocation with Excessive Size Value, Allocation of Resources Without Limits, and Uncontrolled Recursion in the Java implementation of Apache PLC4X (PLC4J) allow a malicious or impersonated device to exhaust the memory or stack of the client application, causing a denial of service. In the OPC UA driver these defects are reachable before authentication: the offending data is parsed while the secure channel and session are being established, before the server's identity has been bound to it. Configuring a trusted server therefore does not prevent exploitation by an attacker who can impersonate it. The individual defects are: - Length-prefixed byte strings are allocated at the size claimed on the wire before the length is checked against the data actually received (0.10.0 through 0.13.1). - Array fields in generated protocol parsers pre-allocate a list with the element count claimed on the wire, allowing a single count field to trigger a multi-gigabyte allocation. This parser is shared by all PLC4J drivers; the OPC UA driver is the verified pre-authentication path (0.10.0 through 0.13.1). - The OPC UA driver accumulates message chunks without enforcing the negotiated maximu
- Product
- Apache PLC4X
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026Handlebars.java before 4.5.5 allows directory traversal.CVE-2026-103088 · Other software · jknack · reported by MITREHigh 7.5
Handlebars.java before 4.5.5 allows directory traversal. In handlebars-springmvc 4.5.3 and 4.5.4, the path-containment fix for CVE-2026-63490 validates template locations as raw percent-encoded strings, whereas the template file is opened through a URL handler that percent-decodes the path. In a Spring MVC application with a file: template prefix and a request-derived view name, a percent-encoded traversal such as %2e%2e/ bypasses both the view-resolver check and the loader-side containment and reads files outside the configured template base directory.
- Product
- handlebars.java
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 29, 2026An attacker can construct a request that, if issued by another application user, will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user'CVE-2026-71189 · Other software · Toptech Systems · reported by ics-cert@hq.dhs.govMedium 4.8
An attacker can construct a request that, if issued by another application user, will cause JavaScript code supplied by the attacker to execute within the user's browser in the context of that user's session with the application.
- Product
- TMS7
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.