Updated 7 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,762exploited flaws on CISA’s list

34added in the last 30 days

343new WordPress flaws this week

390,080entries in the database

2,733 results · page 5 of 55

Oct 2, 2026Paytm Payment Gateway: Does not verify that payment callbacks genuinely originate from the payment providerCVE-2026-81740 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.3
The Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin before 2.8.9 does not verify that payment callbacks genuinely originate from the payment provider when its secret key has not been configured, which is its state immediately after activation, allowing unauthenticated attackers to change the status of arbitrary orders, including marking unpaid orders as paid and reducing stock.
Product
Paytm Payment Gateway
Fixed in
2.8.9
What to do
Update Paytm Payment Gateway to 2.8.9 or newer.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wpscan.com
Oct 1, 2026Paytm Payment Gateway: Does not properly escape data taken from payment callbacks before using it in a SQL statementCVE-2026-81809 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanHigh 7.5
The Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin before 2.8.9 does not properly escape data taken from payment callbacks before using it in a SQL statement, and the integrity check on those callbacks can be forged when the gateway is enabled without credentials, allowing unauthenticated users to perform SQL injection attacks.
Product
Paytm Payment Gateway
Fixed in
2.8.9
What to do
Update Paytm Payment Gateway to 2.8.9 or newer.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wpscan.com
Oct 1, 2026Paytm Payment Gateway: Does not sanitize and escape data it stores from payment callbacks before outputting it in an admin pageCVE-2026-81739 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanHigh 7.5
The Paytm Payment Gateway WordPress plugin before 2.8.9 does not sanitize and escape data it stores from payment callbacks before outputting it in an admin page, and the integrity check on those callbacks can be forged when the gateway is enabled without credentials, allowing unauthenticated users to store scripts that will run in the session of a store administrator.
Product
Paytm Payment Gateway
Fixed in
2.8.9
What to do
Update Paytm Payment Gateway to 2.8.9 or newer.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wpscan.com
Oct 1, 2026Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 expose a network-accessible management interface that does not requirCVE-2026-80276 · Other software · Comelit Group S.p.A. · reported by db4dfee8-a97e-4877-bfae-eba6d14a2166High 7.5
Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 expose a network-accessible management interface that does not require authentication. Through this interface, sensitive device configuration data - including the Remote Configuration Password - can be read in cleartext by a remote, unauthenticated attacker.
Product
1456B Multi-User Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record accesscontrol.fail pro.comelitgroup.com
Oct 1, 2026Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 fail to enforce server-side authorization on an administrative passwoCVE-2026-80275 · Other software · Comelit Group S.p.A. · reported by db4dfee8-a97e-4877-bfae-eba6d14a2166High 8.8
Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 fail to enforce server-side authorization on an administrative password-change function. An authenticated user level can invoke this function to overwrite the installer (administrator) account password.
Product
1456B Multi-User Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record accesscontrol.fail pro.comelitgroup.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to.CVE-2026-102149 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.4
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to. This could allow an attacker to associate a certificate with another user's account, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of that account's encrypted mail and, where certificate-based login is enabled, potentially permitting unauthorized access to the account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrCVE-2026-102146 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expenCVE-2026-102144 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 5.3
A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expensive server-side operation, causing a partial denial of service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handlCVE-2026-102143 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a partyCVE-2026-102139 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a party to the package being requested. An authenticated user of that optional feature could read the subject, message body, and attachments of packages they neither sent nor received.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated administrator on a node with an optional, separately licensed gateway role enabled could supply a connector URL that the server retrieved withoCVE-2026-102138 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Low 3.3
An authenticated administrator on a node with an optional, separately licensed gateway role enabled could supply a connector URL that the server retrieved without sufficient validation of its scheme or destination, causing the server to issue requests to internal network services. Exploitation requires the licensed gateway role to be active.
Product
Core
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that CVE-2026-102135 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.6
On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing code execution as the gateway service account. Replication is disabled by default, and exploitation requires control of a trusted cluster peer or administrative access to the appliance.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Core did not apply its gateway-level API security controls to every request authenticated through the platform's central authentication service.CVE-2026-102134 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 5.4
Kiteworks Core did not apply its gateway-level API security controls to every request authenticated through the platform's central authentication service. An authenticated user could reach REST API functionality over a request path on which those controls, including enforcement of signed-out and revoked sessions, were not applied.
Product
Core
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied.CVE-2026-102131 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the applicatioCVE-2026-102130 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authCVE-2026-102128 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references.CVE-2026-102127 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7
An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outsidCVE-2026-102119 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the appCVE-2026-102116 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deseriaCVE-2026-102108 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service.CVE-2026-102106 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution.CVE-2026-102097 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an authenticated administrator to import configuration whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted submission could potentially allow arbitrary commands to be executed on the affected gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing CVE-2026-102094 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing pipeline could load from an imported rule configuration. An authenticated administrator with mail-rule configuration privileges could cause the gateway to load and execute code beyond the approved set of mail-processing components, potentially in the context of the mail-gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticatedCVE-2026-102089 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticated administrator to write files to arbitrary locations on the server. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in the gateway WebSocket transport that allows connected CVE-2026-101881 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1 contains an allocation of resources without limits vulnerability in the gateway WebSocket transport that allows connected gateways to exhaust node memory. Attackers can send an unending sequence of WebSocket continuation frames without EndOfMessage to cause unbounded memory growth until the node process crashes.
Product
OpenClaw Windows Node
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 30, 2026OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1-3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in NodeService capture handlers that allows connected gateways or agents CVE-2026-101879 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
OpenClaw Windows Node before 2026.7.1-3 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in NodeService capture handlers that allows connected gateways or agents to perform screen snapshots, camera snaps, and location captures without consent prompts. Attackers can invoke screen.snapshot, camera.snap, and location.get over the node WebSocket to silently capture screenshots, photograph users through webcams, and obtain device geolocation without user interaction.
Product
OpenClaw Windows Node
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 30, 2026The CODESYS Gateway Client allocates memory based on a size field in a gateway response without enforcing an appropriate upper limit.CVE-2026-76992 · Other software · CODESYS · reported by info@cert.vde.comHigh 8.7
The CODESYS Gateway Client allocates memory based on a size field in a gateway response without enforcing an appropriate upper limit. An unauthenticated remote attacker controlling a malicious gateway can exploit this behavior to trigger excessive memory consumption, resulting in a denial-of-service condition thus leading to a total loss of availablity.
Product
Development System 3
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record certvde.com
Sep 29, 2026OpenClaw before 2026.9.5 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Gateway's local media root allowlist that breaks filesystem isolation between CVE-2026-102806 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6
OpenClaw before 2026.9.5 contains an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Gateway's local media root allowlist that breaks filesystem isolation between sandboxed sessions. Sandboxed sessions or untrusted content can cause the Gateway to read files from sibling session sandboxes or shared workspace directories through media pipeline functions that fail to restrict reads to the active session.
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.openclaw.ai github.com
Sep 29, 2026Missing authorization in the gateway network scan token API in Devolutions Server 2026.3.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to generateCVE-2026-100289 · Other software · Devolutions · reported by security@devolutions.netMedium 5
Missing authorization in the gateway network scan token API in Devolutions Server 2026.3.5.0 and earlier allows an authenticated low-privileged user to generate a network scan token and perform internal network discovery and port scanning through the gateway via a crafted API request.
Product
Server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record devolutions.net
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability.CVE-2026-76114 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 5.9
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cleartext Transmission of Sensitive Information vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability.CVE-2026-73599 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 5.4
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an URL Redirection to Untrusted Site ('Open Redirect') vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability.CVE-2026-73598 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comHigh 7.8
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability. A low privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability.CVE-2026-73597 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.5
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains a Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Launch of phishing attacks, and Protection mechanism bypass.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability.CVE-2026-73596 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comLow 3.8
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Initialization of a Resource with an Insecure Default vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnCVE-2026-73595 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.7
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains a Download of Code Without Integrity Check vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Code execution, Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerabilitCVE-2026-73594 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.4
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, Versions prior to 5.36, contains an Improper Certificate Validation vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with adjacent network access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, and Protection mechanism bypass.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 29, 2026Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability.CVE-2026-73593 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comLow 3
Dell Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager, versions prior to 5.34.00.16, contains an Active Debug Code vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information disclosure, Information tampering, Protection mechanism bypass, and Unauthorized access.
Product
Secure Connect Gateway (SCG) Policy Manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Sep 27, 2026Predictable exact value from previous values vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88778 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5High 8.8
Predictable exact value from previous values vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23.
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 27, 2026Memory overflow vulnerability vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88777 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5High 8.8
Memory overflow vulnerability vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 27, 2026Memory overflow vulnerability vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88776 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5High 8.8
Memory overflow vulnerability vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 27, 2026Memory overflow vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88775 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5High 8.8
Memory overflow vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading Memory overflow vulnerability leading to unpredictable or erroneous behavior or Denial of Service
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 27, 2026Vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88774 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5High 7
Vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1.37.279 FIPS and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 and before 13.1-64.23 leading to a feature policy bypass due to improper HTTP URL based expression usage.
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 27, 2026Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway.CVE-2026-88773 · Network & remote access · Citrix NetScaler · reported by 50a63c94-1ea7-4568-8c11-eb79e7c5a2b5Critical 9.3
Inconsistent interpretation of HTTP requests ('HTTP Request/Response smuggling') vulnerability in Citrix NetScaler ADC and Citrix NetScaler Gateway. This issue affects ADC: before 14.1-73.37, before 13.1-64.23, before 14.1-73.37 FIPS, and before 13.1-37.279 and NDcPP; Gateway: before 14.1-73.37 FIPS and before 13.1-64.23.
Product
ADC
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenClaw is an agent gateway distributed via npm.CVE-2026-100592 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
OpenClaw is an agent gateway distributed via npm. In versions >= 2026.4.10 and < 2026.7.1, persistent memory dreaming mutations omit owner permission checks. An authorized but non-owner external-channel sender can issue the persistent '/dreaming on' and '/dreaming off' commands to enable or disable the Gateway's Memory Core dreaming behavior, disabling background memory processing or re-enabling durable memory promotion where the owner expected it to remain disabled; the practical confidentiality, integrity, and availability impact depends on stored conversation material and subsequent memory use. Read-only status and help commands remain governed by normal command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. As a workaround, disable dreaming commands in external channels or restrict channel command access to owners.
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent gateway.CVE-2026-100591 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
OpenClaw is an npm-distributed agent gateway. In versions before 2026.7.1, the global Active Memory toggle mutations could omit owner checks. An authorized non-owner external-channel sender could therefore persistently enable or disable Active Memory for the Gateway, disabling memory recall for future sessions or re-enabling global recall where the owner expected it to remain disabled. The issue is limited to persistent global on/off mutations; session-level controls and read-only status remain governed by existing command policy. The issue is fixed in version 2026.7.1. (Suggested title: "OpenClaw before 2026.7.1 missing owner authorization check on Active Memory global toggles".)
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.