Updated 11 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,762exploited flaws on CISA’s list

34added in the last 30 days

343new WordPress flaws this week

390,080entries in the database

4,168 results · page 5 of 84

Oct 1, 2026Tapo C120 v1 and C200 V5 do not adequately protect login challenge data or sanitize attacker-controlled input processed by the MacTool handler.CVE-2026-102369 · Network & remote access · TP-Link Systems Inc. · reported by f23511db-6c3e-4e32-a477-6aa17d310630High 8.7
Tapo C120 v1 and C200 V5 do not adequately protect login challenge data or sanitize attacker-controlled input processed by the MacTool handler. An unauthenticated attacker on the same local network can replay login challenge data to obtain an administrative session, enable a privileged service that becomes accessible after a reboot, and submit crafted input to execute arbitrary commands within the device management process. Successful exploitation may allow arbitrary command execution on the camera and compromise the confidentiality, integrity, and availability of the affected device. Exploitation requires access from the same local network, replay of the login challenge data, activation of the privileged service, and a device reboot.
Product
Tapo C200 v5
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record tp-link.com tp-link.com
Sep 30, 2026Newsletter – Send awesome emails from: Insufficiently Protected CredentialsCVE-2026-92537 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.3
The Newsletter – Send awesome emails from WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Insufficiently Protected Credentials in all versions up to, and including, 9.3.9 The plugin's public click-tracking REST route `/tnp/l/` is registered with `permission_callback => '__return_true'` and, upon receiving a valid keyed-MD5 signature, calls `set_user_cookie()`, which emits a `Set-Cookie: newsletter=<id>-<raw_token>` response header to the requester because the subscriber object loaded via `get_user()` lacks the `_trusted` property, causing `get_user_key()` to return the raw token column value instead of its MD5-masked variant. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers who obtain any signed click-tracking URL for a target subscriber to receive that subscriber's permanent raw authentication cookie, which they can then use to export the subscriber's full PII record via the JSON profile-export endpoint (`?na=px`), rewrite the subscriber's stored profile (`?na=ps`), and silently unsubscribe the subscriber via the RFC-8058 one-click endpoint (`?na=ocu`), none of which require a nonce, password, or email challenge. Signed tracking URLs are embedded in every external link of ever
Product
Newsletter – Send awesome emails from
Affected
up to 9.3.9
What to do
Affects up to 9.3.9. Update Newsletter – Send awesome emails from to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD record plugins.trac.wordpress.org plugins.trac.wordpress.org
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to.CVE-2026-102149 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.4
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to. This could allow an attacker to associate a certificate with another user's account, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of that account's encrypted mail and, where certificate-based login is enabled, potentially permitting unauthorized access to the account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrCVE-2026-102146 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expenCVE-2026-102144 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 5.3
A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expensive server-side operation, causing a partial denial of service.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handlCVE-2026-102143 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a partyCVE-2026-102139 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a party to the package being requested. An authenticated user of that optional feature could read the subject, message body, and attachments of packages they neither sent nor received.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that CVE-2026-102135 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.6
On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing code execution as the gateway service account. Replication is disabled by default, and exploitation requires control of a trusted cluster peer or administrative access to the appliance.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied.CVE-2026-102131 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the applicatioCVE-2026-102130 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authCVE-2026-102128 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references.CVE-2026-102127 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7
An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outsidCVE-2026-102119 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026On deployments where the remote-support capability is licensed and enabled, an authenticated System Administrator who also possessed the key protecting the submCVE-2026-102117 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
On deployments where the remote-support capability is licensed and enabled, an authenticated System Administrator who also possessed the key protecting the submitted data could redirect the underlying system's outbound support connection to a destination of their choosing. That destination could then have operating-system commands executed on the node and receive their output, potentially resulting in remote code execution with the privileges of a local service account.
Product
Core
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the appCVE-2026-102116 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deseriaCVE-2026-102108 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service.CVE-2026-102106 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution.CVE-2026-102097 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an authenticated administrator to import configuration whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted submission could potentially allow arbitrary commands to be executed on the affected gateway.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing CVE-2026-102094 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Unsafe Reflection and does not sufficiently restrict the code that the mail-processing pipeline could load from an imported rule configuration. An authenticated administrator with mail-rule configuration privileges could cause the gateway to load and execute code beyond the approved set of mail-processing components, potentially in the context of the mail-gateway service account.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticatedCVE-2026-102089 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to a path traversal weakness in an administrative import function allowed an authenticated administrator to write files to arbitrary locations on the server. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
Product
Email Protection Gateway
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com raw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an unprivileged user could bypass read-only memory protection due toCVE-2026-47591 · Other software · NVIDIA · reported by psirt@nvidia.comHigh 7.8
NVIDIA GPU Display Driver for Linux contains a vulnerability in the kernel mode layer where an unprivileged user could bypass read-only memory protection due to incorrect authorization, enabling write access to memory marked read-only. A successful exploit of this vulnerability might lead to code execution, denial of service, escalation of privileges, information disclosure, and data tampering.
Product
GeForce
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com nvd.nist.gov
Sep 29, 2026ClaraVerse through 0.3.1 contains server-side request forgery protection bypasses in the download_file and scrape_web agent tools.CVE-2026-102879 · Other software · claraverse-space · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
ClaraVerse through 0.3.1 contains server-side request forgery protection bypasses in the download_file and scrape_web agent tools. Authenticated users can bypass hostname validation and IPv6 transition address filtering to make the server request internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints.
Product
ClaraVerse
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Sep 29, 2026Incorrect reference resolution in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potenCVE-2026-95334 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.3
Incorrect reference resolution in WebProtect in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.57 allowed a remote attacker who had compromised the renderer process to potentially execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Low)
Product
Chrome
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record chromereleases.googleblog.com issues.chromium.org
Sep 29, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal and arbitrary file deletion in the Datasource REST component.CVE-2026-84842 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal and arbitrary file deletion in the Datasource REST component. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to delete files and potentially cause denial of service or impact system integrity.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 29, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the SNMP alert notification functionality.CVE-2026-84440 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the SNMP alert notification functionality. An authenticated attacker who can influence policy alert text can cause attacker-controlled data to be executed as operating system commands by the SNMP alerter service, which runs with root privileges.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 29, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the certificate export CLI functionality, allowing a privileged authenticated CLI user tCVE-2026-84436 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the certificate export CLI functionality, allowing a privileged authenticated CLI user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 29, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the CLI certificate SMIME recipient deletion functionality, allowing an authenticated prCVE-2026-84422 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.2
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to command injection in the CLI certificate SMIME recipient deletion functionality, allowing an authenticated privileged CLI user to execute arbitrary commands with root privileges.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 29, 2026An unprivileged, memory-protected ThreadX module can have the kernel read and write memory at addresses of its choosing, in privileged mode, and can use that toCVE-2026-102757 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgHigh 8.5
An unprivileged, memory-protected ThreadX module can have the kernel read and write memory at addresses of its choosing, in privileged mode, and can use that to clear the MPU enable bit and remove its own isolation boundary. The Module Manager decided whether a privileged service could dereference an object address a module named by asking only whether that address fell outside the module. The manager's object pool is outside every module, so the test was satisfied by an address shifted into the interior of one of the module's own privileged allocations, which denotes no object at all. The bytes such an address presents as a control block are bytes the module put there through ordinary create and set services, so the control block ID at the front of them could be made to read as any type the module chose, and the `_txe_` layer's ID test then agreed. The reported chain uses that to reach a privileged `memset` across an attacker-chosen range.
Product
ThreadX
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Sep 29, 2026Attacker model / Preconditions: a loaded `TXM_MODULE_USER_MODE | TXM_MODULE_MEMORY_PROTECTION` module issuing kernel dispatch calls, on a build with `TX_ENABLE_CVE-2026-102710 · Other software · Eclipse Foundation · reported by emo@eclipse.orgCritical 9.3
Attacker model / Preconditions: a loaded `TXM_MODULE_USER_MODE | TXM_MODULE_MEMORY_PROTECTION` module issuing kernel dispatch calls, on a build with `TX_ENABLE_EVENT_TRACE`. A user-mode, memory-protected module can register an arbitrary function pointer as the global trace-full callback. The kernel calls it directly — no validation, no trampoline — from privileged kernel code when the trace buffer wraps. An invalid pointer faults the kernel (DoS). A pointer into the module's own code was observed running with kernel privilege (`CONTROL.nPRIV = 0`), confirmed at runtime with a register capture inside that code.
Product
eclipse-threadx/threadx
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Sep 29, 2026An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the protection of Actuator endpoints.CVE-2026-78214 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 5.3
An authentication bypass vulnerability exists in the protection of Actuator endpoints. The application determines whether authentication is required by matching the incoming request path against protected Actuator paths. By sending a specially crafted request containing a percent-encoded path, a remote unauthenticated attacker can cause the security check to fail to recognize the request as targeting a protected endpoint. As a result, the attacker may bypass authentication and access otherwise restricted Actuator endpoints. Successful exploitation may expose operational or configuration information and, depending on the enabled endpoints and application configuration, allow access to sensitive management functionality. This issue affects Apache DolphinScheduler: before 3.4.3. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 3.4.3, which fixes the issue.
Product
Apache DolphinScheduler
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.apache.org openwall.com
Sep 28, 2026Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in ABB Protection and control IED manager (PCM600).CVE-2026-15953 · Other software · ABB · reported by cybersecurity@ch.abb.comMedium 5.6
Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability in ABB Protection and control IED manager (PCM600). This issue affects Protection and control IED manager (PCM600): through 2.14.
Product
Protection and control IED manager (PCM600)
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record search.abb.com
Sep 28, 2026Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in ABB Protection and control IED manager (PCM600).CVE-2026-15952 · Other software · ABB · reported by cybersecurity@ch.abb.comHigh 7.1
Incorrect Permission Assignment for Critical Resource vulnerability in ABB Protection and control IED manager (PCM600). This issue affects Protection and control IED manager (PCM600): through 2.14.
Product
Protection and control IED manager (PCM600)
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record search.abb.com
Sep 27, 2026Fleet before 4.87.0 does not protect the two endpoints that serve in-house iOS application packages and manifests (enterprise tier only) with the intended randoCVE-2026-101047 · Other software · fleetdm · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Fleet before 4.87.0 does not protect the two endpoints that serve in-house iOS application packages and manifests (enterprise tier only) with the intended random, time-limited URL token. Because Apple's InstallEnterpriseApplication MDM command requires these URLs to be reachable without a Fleet session, they cannot rely on session-based authentication, and the missing token allows an unauthenticated attacker with network access to the Fleet server to download in-house IPA binaries and their metadata (bundle identifier, version, and name) by guessing sequential title identifiers. The impact is limited to read-only disclosure; there is no privilege escalation or write access, and the free tier is unaffected (it returns fleet.ErrMissingLicense).
Product
fleet
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 26, 2026Froxlor versions before 2.3.12 contain a credential disclosure vulnerability in the DirProtections.listing API command that returns htpasswd password hashes.CVE-2026-100719 · Other software · froxlor · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
Froxlor versions before 2.3.12 contain a credential disclosure vulnerability in the DirProtections.listing API command that returns htpasswd password hashes. Authenticated API users can retrieve bcrypt password hashes for protected-directory users, enabling offline cracking attempts and exposure of reused credentials.
Product
froxlor
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 25, 2026OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser wait predicates that allows attackers to bypass SSRF protectionCVE-2026-100576 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
OpenClaw versions before 2026.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in browser wait predicates that allows attackers to bypass SSRF protections by reaching blocked destinations. Attackers can use the wait --fn function against an existing browser session to request loopback or private destinations without navigation checks applied to other browser actions.
Product
OpenClaw
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the Universal Connector Oracle Wallet upload component.CVE-2026-84882 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the Universal Connector Oracle Wallet upload component. An authenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files to the system.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to insecure deserialization in the Quartz JDBC job store.CVE-2026-84862 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.2
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to insecure deserialization in the Quartz JDBC job store. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code on the affected system.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the GIM bundle import functionality.CVE-2026-85542 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the GIM bundle import functionality. An authenticated attacker can provide a crafted GIM bundle that causes attacker-controlled arguments to be passed to the tar command, resulting in arbitrary command execution with elevated privileges on the Central Manager.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, delete arbitrary files, or execute arbitrary code due to impropCVE-2026-85029 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to obtain sensitive information, delete arbitrary files, or execute arbitrary code due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection in the PESI service.CVE-2026-84893 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.6
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection in the PESI service. An authenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to access sensitive information in the internal database.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 stores internal REST service-account passwords in a reversible plaintext-equivalent format.CVE-2026-84884 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 stores internal REST service-account passwords in a reversible plaintext-equivalent format. An authenticated attacker who gains access to the stored credential could recover the password and obtain an administrative REST access token.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Sep 25, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vhost-vdpa: protect config_ctx from being freed under the config callback vhost_vdpa_confiCVE-2026-97992 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: vhost-vdpa: protect config_ctx from being freed under the config callback vhost_vdpa_config_cb() loads v->config_ctx and signals it without taking a reference and without holding any lock: struct eventfd_ctx *config_ctx = v->config_ctx; if (config_ctx) eventfd_signal(config_ctx); VHOST_VDPA_SET_CONFIG_CALL replaces that field and drops what is normally the last reference to the old context: swap(ctx, v->config_ctx); if (ctx) eventfd_ctx_put(ctx); eventfd_ctx_put() drops the last kref and frees the context immediately, with no RCU grace period, so a callback that has already loaded the pointer goes on to dereference freed memory. The two sides share no lock: the ioctl runs under vhost_dev.mutex, while the parent invokes the callback from its own interrupt or workqueue context. This is not the reopen refcount underflow fixed by commit f6bbf0010ba0 ("vhost-vdpa: fix use-after-free of v->config_ctx"), which was about vhost_vdpa_config_put() leaving a stale pointer behind. Here the pointer is maintained correctly and it is the read side that is unprotected. With VDUSE as the parent this is reachable
Product
Linux
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record git.kernel.org git.kernel.org
Sep 25, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: cttimeout: prevent UAF during module unload nf_ct_set_timeout() protects the tiCVE-2026-97609 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67High 7
In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: netfilter: cttimeout: prevent UAF during module unload nf_ct_set_timeout() protects the timeout hook dereference and policy lookup with rcu_read_lock(). cttimeout_exit(), however, unregisters the per-net operations before it clears the hook. This allows the following interleaving: CPU 0 CPU 1 cttimeout_exit() nf_ct_set_timeout() unregister_pernet_subsys() rcu_read_lock() kfree(pernet) h = nf_ct_timeout_hook h->timeout_find_get() nfct_timeout_pernet() The hook still points to ctnl_timeout_find_get() when CPU 1 looks up the already freed per-net timeout list. KASAN reported: BUG: KASAN: slab-use-after-free in ctnl_timeout_find_get Read of size 8 by task poc/90 Call Trace: ctnl_timeout_find_get+0x271/0x2a0 [nfnetlink_cttimeout] nf_ct_set_timeout+0x7b/0x3c0 xt_ct_tg_check+0x724/0xb20 xt_check_target+0x234/0xa90 do_ipt_set_ctl+0x570/0x1270 Allocated by task 89: __kmalloc_noprof+0x16e/0x460 ops_init+0x6d/0x420 regis
Product
Linux
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record git.kernel.org git.kernel.org
Sep 25, 2026Link Library: Does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetchCVE-2026-78397 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 4
The Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6 does not validate the destination of a user-supplied URL before falling back to an unprotected fetch when its safe request is rejected, allowing unauthenticated visitors to make the site issue requests to hosts on its internal network and to learn from the response whether an internal service answered. Versions below 7.8.8 are covered by CVE-2025-68600; this entry covers 7.8.8 through 7.9.5, where that fix was incomplete. Exploitation requires the site owner to have published the Link Library WordPress plugin before 7.9.6's public link submission form with reciprocal-link validation enabled.
Product
Link Library
Affected
up to 7.9.5
Fixed in
7.9.6
What to do
Update Link Library to 7.9.6 or newer.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wpscan.com
Sep 24, 2026Secure Folder 1.2 stores files selected for its password-protected vault as unencrypted files in the Android shared-storage tree.CVE-2026-84283 · Other software · FluteCode · reported by help@fluidattacks.comMedium 6.8
Secure Folder 1.2 stores files selected for its password-protected vault as unencrypted files in the Android shared-storage tree. A local application or file manager that has access to the relevant shared-storage path can enumerate, copy, and open those files without authenticating to Secure Folder.
Product
Secure Folder
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record fluidattacks.com play.google.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.