Updated 37 min ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,764exploited flaws on CISA’s list

36added in the last 30 days

479new WordPress flaws this week

390,525entries in the database

202 results · page 4 of 5

Jan 9, 2013The WCF Replace function in the Open Data (aka OData) protocol implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4, and the Management OData ICVE-2013-0005 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.8
The WCF Replace function in the Open Data (aka OData) protocol implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4, and the Management OData IIS Extension on Windows Server 2012, allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (resource consumption and daemon restart) via crafted values in HTTP requests, aka "Replace Denial of Service Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Jan 9, 2013Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly validate the permissions of objects in memory, which allowCVE-2013-0004 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly validate the permissions of objects in memory, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Double Construction Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Jan 9, 2013Buffer overflow in a System.DirectoryServices.Protocols (S.DS.P) namespace method in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows reCVE-2013-0003 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Buffer overflow in a System.DirectoryServices.Protocols (S.DS.P) namespace method in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application that leverages a missing array-size check during a memory copy operation, aka "S.DS.P Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Jan 9, 2013Buffer overflow in the Windows Forms (aka WinForms) component in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows remoCVE-2013-0002 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Buffer overflow in the Windows Forms (aka WinForms) component in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application that leverages improper counting of objects during a memory copy operation, aka "WinForms Buffer Overflow Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Jan 9, 2013The Windows Forms (aka WinForms) component in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 4, and 4.5 does not properly initialize memory arraysCVE-2013-0001 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 4.3
The Windows Forms (aka WinForms) component in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 4, and 4.5 does not properly initialize memory arrays, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application that leverages a pointer to an unmanaged memory location, aka "System Drawing Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.microsoft.com oval.cisecurity.org
Nov 13, 2012The code-optimization feature in the reflection implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 4 and 4.5 does not properly enforce object permissions, which allows CVE-2012-4777 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The code-optimization feature in the reflection implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 4 and 4.5 does not properly enforce object permissions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "WPF Reflection Optimization Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record osvdb.org secunia.com
Nov 13, 2012The Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (WPAD) functionality in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not validate configuration data that is returCVE-2012-4776 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The Web Proxy Auto-Discovery (WPAD) functionality in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not validate configuration data that is returned during acquisition of proxy settings, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript code by providing crafted data during execution of (1) an XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a .NET Framework application, aka "Web Proxy Auto-Discovery Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record osvdb.org secunia.com
Nov 13, 2012Untrusted search path vulnerability in Entity Framework in ADO.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, and 4 allows local users tCVE-2012-2519 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.9
Untrusted search path vulnerability in Entity Framework in ADO.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, and 4 allows local users to gain privileges via a Trojan horse DLL in the current working directory, as demonstrated by a directory that contains a .NET application, aka ".NET Framework Insecure Library Loading Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securitytracker.com
Nov 13, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5.1 does not properly consider trust levels during construction of output data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sCVE-2012-1896 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 5
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5.1 does not properly consider trust levels during construction of output data, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Code Access Security Info Disclosure Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securityfocus.com
Nov 13, 2012The reflection implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly enforce object permissions, which allows remCVE-2012-1895 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The reflection implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly enforce object permissions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Reflection Bypass Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securitytracker.com
Jun 12, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly handle function pointers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code viaCVE-2012-1855 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly handle function pointers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Memory Access Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
May 8, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 4 does not properly compare index values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application hang) via crafted reqCVE-2012-0164 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 5
Microsoft .NET Framework 4 does not properly compare index values, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (application hang) via crafted requests to a Windows Presentation Foundation (WPF) application, aka ".NET Framework Index Comparison Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityfocus.com docs.microsoft.com
May 8, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 4 does not properly allocate buffers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser applicatioCVE-2012-0162 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 4 does not properly allocate buffers, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Buffer Allocation Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityfocus.com us-cert.gov
May 8, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly handle an unspecified exception during use of partially truCVE-2012-0161 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly handle an unspecified exception during use of partially trusted assemblies to serialize input data, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Serialization Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securityfocus.com
May 8, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly serialize input data, which allows remote attackers to execCVE-2012-0160 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly serialize input data, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP) or (2) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Serialization Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securityfocus.com
Apr 10, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly validate function parameters, which allows remote attackers to execCVE-2012-0163 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5.1, 4, and 4.5 does not properly validate function parameters, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Parameter Validation Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securitytracker.com us-cert.gov
Feb 14, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5.1 does not properly calculate the length of an unspecified buffer, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary cCVE-2012-0015 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2 and 3.5.1 does not properly calculate the length of an unspecified buffer, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Heap Corruption Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Feb 14, 2012Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4, and Silverlight 4 before 4.1.10111, does not properly restrict access to memory associated with unmanaged objectCVE-2012-0014 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.8
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4, and Silverlight 4 before 4.1.10111, does not properly restrict access to memory associated with unmanaged objects, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, or (4) a crafted Silverlight application, aka ".NET Framework Unmanaged Objects Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Dec 29, 2011The Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, when sliding expiry is enabled,CVE-2011-3417 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, when sliding expiry is enabled, does not properly handle cached content, which allows remote attackers to obtain access to arbitrary user accounts via a crafted URL, aka "ASP.NET Forms Authentication Ticket Caching Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 7
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityfocus.com us-cert.gov
Dec 29, 2011The Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 allows remote authenticated userCVE-2011-3416 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 8.5
The Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 allows remote authenticated users to obtain access to arbitrary user accounts via a crafted username, aka "ASP.Net Forms Authentication Bypass Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 7
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Dec 29, 2011Open redirect vulnerability in the Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 allows remCVE-2011-3415 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 6.8
Open redirect vulnerability in the Forms Authentication feature in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 allows remote attackers to redirect users to arbitrary web sites and conduct phishing attacks via a crafted return URL, aka "Insecure Redirect in .NET Form Authentication Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 7
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record jvn.jp jvndb.jvn.jp
Dec 29, 2011The CaseInsensitiveHashProvider.getHashCode function in the HashTable implementation in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 CVE-2011-3414 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.8
The CaseInsensitiveHashProvider.getHashCode function in the HashTable implementation in the ASP.NET subsystem in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 computes hash values for form parameters without restricting the ability to trigger hash collisions predictably, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (CPU consumption) by sending many crafted parameters, aka "Collisions in HashTable May Cause DoS Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 7
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record archives.neohapsis.com kb.cert.org
Oct 11, 2011Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4, and Silverlight 4 before 4.0.60831, does not properly restrict inheritance, which allows remotCVE-2011-1253 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4, and Silverlight 4 before 4.0.60831, does not properly restrict inheritance, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, or (4) a crafted Silverlight application, aka ".NET Framework Class Inheritance Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.microsoft.com oval.cisecurity.org
Aug 10, 2011Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly validate the System.Net.Sockets trust level, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive CVE-2011-1978 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 4.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5.1, and 4 does not properly validate the System.Net.Sockets trust level, which allows remote attackers to obtain sensitive information or trigger arbitrary outbound network traffic via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Socket Restriction Bypass Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.microsoft.com oval.cisecurity.org
Aug 10, 2011The ASP.NET Chart controls in Microsoft .NET Framework 4, and Chart Control for Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, do not properly verify functions in URIs, whicCVE-2011-1977 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 4.3
The ASP.NET Chart controls in Microsoft .NET Framework 4, and Chart Control for Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 SP1, do not properly verify functions in URIs, which allows remote attackers to read arbitrary files via special characters in a URI in an HTTP request, aka "Chart Control Information Disclosure Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Jun 16, 2011Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2, 3.5 Gold and SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, and Silverlight 4 before 4.0.60531.0, does not properly validate arguments to unspecCVE-2011-0664 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2, 3.5 Gold and SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, and Silverlight 4 before 4.0.60531.0, does not properly validate arguments to unspecified networking API functions, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, or (4) a crafted Silverlight application, aka ".NET Framework Array Offset Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.microsoft.com oval.cisecurity.org
May 10, 2011The JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Gold and SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, when IsJITOptimizerDisabled is false, does not properly handle expressions relateCVE-2011-1271 · Computers, phones & browsers · microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.7
The JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 3.5 Gold and SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, when IsJITOptimizerDisabled is false, does not properly handle expressions related to null strings, which allows context-dependent attackers to bypass intended access restrictions, and consequently execute arbitrary code, in opportunistic circumstances by leveraging a crafted application, as demonstrated by (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework JIT Optimization Vulnerability."
Product
.net_framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record stackoverflow.com docs.microsoft.com
Apr 13, 2011The x86 JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 does not properly compile function calls, which allows remote attackers to exeCVE-2010-3958 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The x86 JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP2, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0 does not properly compile function calls, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka ".NET Framework Stack Corruption Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Oct 13, 2010The JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 on 64-bit platforms does not properly perform optimizations, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitraryCVE-2010-3228 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The JIT compiler in Microsoft .NET Framework 4.0 on 64-bit platforms does not properly perform optimizations, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .NET application that triggers memory corruption, aka ".NET Framework x64 JIT Compiler Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Sep 22, 2010Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP1 and SP2, 3.5, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, as used for ASP.NET in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS), provides CVE-2010-3332 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 6.4
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, 2.0 SP1 and SP2, 3.5, 3.5 SP1, 3.5.1, and 4.0, as used for ASP.NET in Microsoft Internet Information Services (IIS), provides detailed error codes during decryption attempts, which allows remote attackers to decrypt and modify encrypted View State (aka __VIEWSTATE) form data, and possibly forge cookies or read application files, via a padding oracle attack, aka "ASP.NET Padding Oracle Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record blogs.technet.com isc.sans.edu
Aug 11, 2010The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5 SP1, and 3.5.1, and Microsoft Silverlight 2 and 3 before 3.0.50611.0 onCVE-2010-1898 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, 3.5 SP1, and 3.5.1, and Microsoft Silverlight 2 and 3 before 3.0.50611.0 on Windows and before 3.0.41130.0 on Mac OS X, does not properly handle interfaces and delegations to virtual methods, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (aka XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Virtual Method Delegate Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
May 27, 2010The default configuration of ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET before 1.1 has a value of FALSE for the EnableViewStateMac property, which allows remote attackers to conCVE-2010-2085 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
The default configuration of ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET before 1.1 has a value of FALSE for the EnableViewStateMac property, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks via the __VIEWSTATE parameter.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record blackhat.com trustwave.com
Oct 14, 2009Multiple integer overflows in unspecified APIs in GDI+ in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows ServCVE-2009-2504 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Multiple integer overflows in unspecified APIs in GDI+ in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.1 SP1, .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2, Windows XP SP2 and SP3, Windows Server 2003 SP2, Vista Gold and SP1, Server 2008 Gold, Office XP SP3, Office 2003 SP3, 2007 Microsoft Office System SP1 and SP2, Office Project 2002 SP1, Visio 2002 SP2, Office Word Viewer, Word Viewer 2003 Gold and SP3, Office Excel Viewer 2003 Gold and SP3, Office Excel Viewer, Office PowerPoint Viewer 2007 Gold, SP1, and SP2, Office Compatibility Pack for Word, Excel, and PowerPoint 2007 File Formats SP1 and SP2, Expression Web, Expression Web 2, Groove 2007 Gold and SP1, Works 8.5, SQL Server 2000 Reporting Services SP2, SQL Server 2005 SP2 and SP3, Report Viewer 2005 SP1, Report Viewer 2008 Gold and SP1, and Forefront Client Security 1.0 allow remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "GDI+ .NET API Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 2003 Server
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Oct 14, 2009The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, wCVE-2009-2497 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The Common Language Runtime (CLR) in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, 2.0 SP2, 3.5, and 3.5 SP1, and Silverlight 2, does not properly handle interfaces, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted Silverlight application, (3) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (4) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft Silverlight and Microsoft .NET Framework CLR Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 2000
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Oct 14, 2009Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 does not properly enforce a certain type-equality constraint in .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackeCVE-2009-0091 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0, 2.0 SP1, and 3.5 does not properly enforce a certain type-equality constraint in .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Type Verification Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 2000
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Oct 14, 2009Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, and 2.0 SP1 does not properly validate .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to obtain unintended accesCVE-2009-0090 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0 SP3, 1.1 SP1, and 2.0 SP1 does not properly validate .NET verifiable code, which allows remote attackers to obtain unintended access to stack memory, and execute arbitrary code, via (1) a crafted XAML browser application (XBAP), (2) a crafted ASP.NET application, or (3) a crafted .NET Framework application, aka "Microsoft .NET Framework Pointer Verification Vulnerability."
Product
Windows 2000
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record us-cert.gov docs.microsoft.com
Aug 12, 2009ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2 and 3.5 Gold and SP1, when ASP 2.0 is used in integrated mode on IIS 7.0, does not properly manage request sCVE-2009-1536 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comLow 2.6
ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 SP1 and SP2 and 3.5 Gold and SP1, when ASP 2.0 is used in integrated mode on IIS 7.0, does not properly manage request scheduling, which allows remote attackers to cause a denial of service (daemon outage) via a series of crafted HTTP requests, aka "Remote Unauthenticated Denial of Service in ASP.NET Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record blogs.technet.com osvdb.org
Nov 17, 2008The strong name (SN) implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727 relies on the digital signature Public Key Token embedded in the pathname of a DLL filCVE-2008-5100 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREHigh 10
The strong name (SN) implementation in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0.50727 relies on the digital signature Public Key Token embedded in the pathname of a DLL file instead of the digital signature of this file itself, which makes it easier for attackers to bypass Global Assembly Cache (GAC) and Code Access Security (CAS) protection mechanisms, aka MSRC ticket MSRC8566gs.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityreason.com applicationsecurity.co.il
Aug 27, 2008Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework without the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous clienCVE-2008-3842 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework without the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous client input, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by a query string containing a "</" (less-than slash) sequence.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityreason.com procheckup.com
Aug 27, 2008Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework with the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous client iCVE-2008-3843 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
Request Validation (aka the ValidateRequest filters) in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework with the MS07-040 update does not properly detect dangerous client input, which allows remote attackers to conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, as demonstrated by a query string containing a "<~/" (less-than tilde slash) sequence followed by a crafted STYLE element.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record securityreason.com procheckup.com
Jul 10, 2007The Just In Time (JIT) Compiler service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows user-assisted remote aCVE-2007-0043 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The Just In Time (JIT) Compiler service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows user-assisted remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving an "unchecked buffer," probably a buffer overflow, aka ".NET JIT Compiler Vulnerability".
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de osvdb.org
Jul 10, 2007The PE Loader service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary coCVE-2007-0041 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 9.3
The PE Loader service in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via unspecified vectors involving an "unchecked buffer" and unvalidated message lengths, probably a buffer overflow.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de osvdb.org
Jul 10, 2007Interpretation conflict in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to access CVE-2007-0042 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 7.8
Interpretation conflict in ASP.NET in Microsoft .NET Framework 1.0, 1.1, and 2.0 for Windows 2000, XP, Server 2003, and Vista allows remote attackers to access configuration files and obtain sensitive information, and possibly bypass security mechanisms that try to constrain the final substring of a string, via %00 characters, related to use of %00 as a string terminator within POSIX functions but a data character within .NET strings, aka "Null Byte Termination Vulnerability."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record archive.cert.uni-stuttgart.de secunia.com
Apr 10, 2007Microsoft ASP .NET Framework 2.0.50727.42 does not properly handle comment (/* */) enclosures, which allows remote attackers to bypass request filtering and conCVE-2006-7192 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
Microsoft ASP .NET Framework 2.0.50727.42 does not properly handle comment (/* */) enclosures, which allows remote attackers to bypass request filtering and conduct cross-site scripting (XSS) attacks, or cause a denial of service, as demonstrated via an xss:expression STYLE attribute in a closing XSS HTML tag.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record osvdb.org securityreason.com
Oct 10, 2006Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors CVE-2006-3436 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 4.3
Cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerability in Microsoft .NET Framework 2.0 allows remote attackers to inject arbitrary web script or HTML via unspecified vectors involving "ASP.NET controls that set the AutoPostBack property to true".
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securitytracker.com
Jul 11, 2006Microsoft .NET framework 2.0 (ASP.NET) in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 and SP2, and Server 2003 up to SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass access restricCVE-2006-1300 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 5
Microsoft .NET framework 2.0 (ASP.NET) in Microsoft Windows 2000 SP4, XP SP1 and SP2, and Server 2003 up to SP1 allows remote attackers to bypass access restrictions via unspecified "URL paths" that can access Application Folder objects "explicitly by name."
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record secunia.com securitytracker.com
Mar 29, 2006Buffer overflow in calloc.c in the Microsoft Windows XP SP2 ntdll.dll system library, when used by the ILDASM disassembler in the Microsoft .NET 1.0 and 1.1 SDKCVE-2006-1510 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4
Buffer overflow in calloc.c in the Microsoft Windows XP SP2 ntdll.dll system library, when used by the ILDASM disassembler in the Microsoft .NET 1.0 and 1.1 SDK, might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a crafted .dll file with a large static method.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.grok.org.uk owasp.net
Mar 29, 2006Buffer overflow in the ILASM assembler in the Microsoft .NET 1.0 and 1.1 Framework might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .il file CVE-2006-1511 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 5.1
Buffer overflow in the ILASM assembler in the Microsoft .NET 1.0 and 1.1 Framework might allow user-assisted attackers to execute arbitrary code via a .il file that calls a function with a long name.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.grok.org.uk owasp.net
Mar 14, 2005Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Mono 1.0.5 implementation of ASP.NET (.Net) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web scCVE-2005-0509 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
Multiple cross-site scripting (XSS) vulnerabilities in the Mono 1.0.5 implementation of ASP.NET (.Net) allow remote attackers to inject arbitrary HTML or web script via Unicode representations for ASCII fullwidth characters that are converted to normal ASCII characters, including ">" and "<".
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record it-project.ru marc.info
Sep 28, 2004Buffer overflow in the JPEG (JPG) parsing engine in the Microsoft Graphic Device Interface Plus (GDI+) component, GDIPlus.dll, allows remote attackers to executCVE-2004-0200 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by MITREHigh 9.3
Buffer overflow in the JPEG (JPG) parsing engine in the Microsoft Graphic Device Interface Plus (GDI+) component, GDIPlus.dll, allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary code via a JPEG image with a small JPEG COM field length that is normalized to a large integer length before a memory copy operation.
Product
.net Framework
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record marc.info kb.cert.org

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.