Critical security advisoryCriticalFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is on CISA’s exploited list. Most WordPress hosting runs PHP. See if your site is affectedFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is being exploited. DetailsExploited: PHP2Shell. Check your site
HuttenlocherTechnologies
Updated 6 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,762exploited flaws on CISA’s list
34added in the last 30 days
344new WordPress flaws this week
390,080entries in the database

5,696 results · page 2 of 114

  • Oct 21, 2026Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability when a message is forwarded as an attachment.CVE-2026-114717 · Email & office · reported by MITREMedium 4

    Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability when a message is forwarded as an attachment. The subject of the forwarded message was used verbatim to generate the attachment name, so a received message whose subject contains CRLF sequences could inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the outgoing message. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via subject of a message forwarded as attachment”, which collapses whitespace in the generated name.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability.CVE-2026-114716 · Email & office · reported by MITREHigh 8.5

    Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a mail header injection vulnerability. rcmail_sendmail::extract_inline_images() used the media type taken from an inline image data URI without validating it, so a remote authenticated attacker could inject arbitrary MIME part headers into the outgoing message by placing CRLF sequences in that media type. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix mail header injection via media type in an inline image data URI”, which validates the media type with rcube_mime::is_mimetype_valid().

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Modoboa driver of the password plugin.CVE-2026-114715 · Email & office · reported by MITREMedium 6.8

    Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by an incorrect authorization vulnerability in the Modoboa driver of the password plugin. The driver took the first entry of the account search result returned by the Modoboa API instead of matching the authenticated user, so a password change could be applied to a different account. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix bug where Password Modoboa driver could change password for another account”, which selects the account whose username matches and fails if none does.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a path traversal vulnerability in the squirrelmail_usercopy plugin.CVE-2026-114714 · Websites & servers · Roundcube · reported by MITREMedium 5.3

    Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 is affected by a path traversal vulnerability in the squirrelmail_usercopy plugin. With the file based backend, the source path was built from the login name without rejecting path separators, so a login name containing a slash could cause files outside the configured squirrelmail_data_dir to be read and imported. Upstream fixed this in the commit “Fix unsafe use of a login name in SquirrelMail import file path”, which rejects login names containing a slash.

    Product
    Webmail
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Incorrect authorization in the COM administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows an account assigned the serveradmin role with CVE-2026-114490 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 7.8

    Incorrect authorization in the COM administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - a credential an administrator may create meaning to confine it to those domains - to act as the whole-server administrator over COM. Administrator roles are meant to confine such a credential to the domains its list names, and the REST API did not take it for the server administrator, but the COM API's server-administrator check read the administer_server permission as the whole server whatever list the grant carried. So the credential signed in through the Control Panel, or through a script run on the server, as the server administrator of every domain: it could read and change every domain's accounts and mail, rename any domain, map a domain alias onto any, write the server's settings and secrets, and create further server-administrator accounts. The COM API's domain-administrator check, asked with no domain, likewise let an account assigned the domainadmin role with a list of domains that leaves out the account's own domain administer that domain's ordinary accounts over COM. An account holding servera

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credCVE-2026-114489 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 8.1

    Missing authorization in the REST and COM administration APIs of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to change mail routing and domain configuration beyond those domains on a multi-tenant server. A domain administrator, an account or API key given another role that manages accounts in named domains, or a full-scope API key issued for named domains could create a domain alias for any name (so that other tenants' mail for that name is diverted to an address the attacker controls, or denied), rename a domain to any name the server does not host, set a rule's bind-to-address, send-using-route or script-function action to reach one of the server's own addresses, a configured route's stored credentials or a function of the server's event script, and set the domain's relay host - which delivery then connects to with no address rule - to an address on the server's own network; and over the COM API any account could set the three rule actions on its own rules, where the script-function action runs at delivery. The authorization gate did not refuse these routes to a confined credential and the hand

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Not failing securely in the anti-virus attachment-stripping action of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attackerCVE-2026-114479 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 5.8

    Not failing securely in the anti-virus attachment-stripping action of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have a message that the server's virus scanner found infected delivered to the recipient's mailbox unchanged. With virus scanning enabled and its action set to remove attachments and deliver the text (the default action deletes the message), the server keeps one text part of an infected message and replaces every attachment with a note. A message whose single part is not text - a program or an archive sent as the whole message, a message carried whole, a file declared an attachment, or an S/MIME message signed as one part, whose content the recipient's mail client opens - had no part the action could pick out, and was delivered as it arrived, with the content the scanner had found and nothing but a line in the application log to show it. Any sender can write such a message.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Insufficient preservation of the original sender in the forwarding of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attackerCVE-2026-114478 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 5.9

    Insufficient preservation of the original sender in the forwarding of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have mail they write, naming in its From an address at a domain the server hosts, delivered to other receivers as passing that domain's DMARC policy. When the server sent on a copy of mail that came from outside - an account's forward, a mail rule's forward, a Sieve redirect, a list's copy, or an alias or list expanding to an outside address - it could give the copy an SMTP identity in the organisation of the domain the copy's From names, whatever the message's origin: with the Sender Rewriting Scheme or the rewrite of the envelope sender on forwarding enabled (both off by default), an address at the forwarding domain; for a list, its bounce address; for a message with an empty envelope sender, none, under the server's own host name; and an envelope sender the message came with at a subdomain of a hosted domain was kept. Where that identity's SPF record authorises the server, other receivers' SPF check of the copy passed for a domain aligned with the From, and DMARC passed with it, although the message had not passed DMA

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Missing authorization in the REST metrics route of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is conCVE-2026-114477 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 4.3

    Missing authorization in the REST metrics route of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.25 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to read the server-wide traffic history. GET /api/v1/metrics/history returns the server's traffic counters over the last 30 days; those counters are server-wide and carry no domain, which is why the report routes already refuse the same counters to a credential confined to named domains. The metrics route was not among the routes the server's authorization gate refuses a confined credential and its handler was not given the caller, so a domain administrator, an account given another role that holds view_configuration in named domains (the auditor role given a domain list among them), or an API key issued for named domains could read the whole server's traffic totals rather than its own domains'. The disclosure is of aggregate operational counters, not of any message or account.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Incorrect authorization in the REST administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential CVE-2026-114476 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 7.5

    Incorrect authorization in the REST administration API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential holds the manage_roles permission in named domains - a full-scope API key issued for those domains, or an account assigned the serveradmin role with a list of domains - to obtain the server administrator's authority. An account's admin level gives it authority, and a role assigned to it replaces that authority, which is how an administrator narrows an account whose admin level is the server administrator's. The route that takes a role away (DELETE /api/v1/role-assignments/{address}) checked only that the credential takes in what the account held at the time, not what it would hold afterwards, so such a credential could take a narrowing role away from an account in its domains whose admin level is the server administrator's, returning it to the server administrator's authority, and, having set that account's password while it held the narrower role, sign in as the server administrator.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Missing authorization in the REST role-management routes of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credentiaCVE-2026-114475 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 6.5

    Missing authorization in the REST role-management routes of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.3.4 through 6.3.6 allows a remote authenticated user whose credential is confined to named domains to modify a custom role that accounts in other domains hold, and to create custom roles and delete any that no account holds. The routes that create, update and delete a custom role require the manage_roles permission, which only the serveradmin role holds; but a full-scope API key issued for named domains, and serveradmin assigned with a domain list, are serveradmin confined to those domains and hold manage_roles. The server's authorization gate did not refuse the three role routes to a confined credential and the route named no domain, so a credential issued to one tenant could raise or lower the permissions of a custom role assigned across other tenants - granting another domain's role every permission over its mailboxes and settings, or removing what it needs. A custom role may not hold administer_server, administer_domain or manage_roles, so the confined credential cannot make itself or another a server administrator by creating or rewriting a custom role.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Use of a less trusted source for the envelope sender in the external-account download of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unautCVE-2026-114474 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 5.9

    Use of a less trusted source for the envelope sender in the external-account download of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have mail they write in the name of a domain the server hosts sent on by the server with an envelope sender at that domain, so that it passes the domain's SPF and DMARC at other receivers. A message the server downloads from an external POP3 or IMAP account has no SMTP envelope of its own, and the server took the address in its From header as its envelope sender, whatever that address was. A forward or redirect of the downloaded message to an outside address then left with that address as its envelope sender, which the Sender Rewriting Scheme leaves alone for a hosted domain, so that the receiver's SPF check passed for the forged domain, aligned even under strict alignment, with no non-default setting, host name record or DMARC policy needed. An attacker needs to know a mailbox elsewhere that an account here collects and forwards to an outside address; an account holder who adds an external account of their own can collect from a server of their own, which matters where SmtpAuthenticatedSenderCheck hol

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Incorrect authorization in the Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.1 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to relay mail throughCVE-2026-114473 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 5

    Incorrect authorization in the Sender Rewriting Scheme (SRS) of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.2.1 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to relay mail through the server to outside addresses. With SRS enabled, the server rewrites the envelope sender of mail it forwards to a signed SRS address at the forwarding domain, and passes a bounce to that address back to the original sender; but it took every message to a valid SRS address, whatever its sender, as delivery to a local recipient, so the relay rules and the SMTP authentication they require were not applied, and the message was delivered to the outside address the SRS address encodes. Anyone holding a valid SRS address of the server, such as the recipient of a forwarded message, could have the server relay mail to the address it encodes for 21 days, and an account holder whose account forwards to an outside mailbox could obtain one for any address. SRS is off by default.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Insufficient resource pool in the ACME HTTP-01 challenge responder of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attackerCVE-2026-114472 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comLow 3.7

    Insufficient resource pool in the ACME HTTP-01 challenge responder of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to cause a certificate issuance or renewal to fail. When the server obtains or renews a TLS certificate over ACME it runs an HTTP-01 challenge responder on port 80 for the certificate authority to read the challenge token; the responder served one connection at a time, accepting a socket, waiting up to five seconds to receive a request, answering it, and only then accepting the next. A client that connected and sent nothing held the single worker for the whole timeout, so enough idle connections during a validation keep the certificate authority's own request from being answered in time and the validation fails. Sustained across a certificate's renewals this leads to the certificate expiring, after which clients refuse the server's TLS; the mail service itself continues on its current certificate until then. No authentication is required to connect to the responder. Version 6.3.7 serves up to 64 connections at once and closes a connection past that, so that where a handful of idle connections, one after another, sufficed be

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Insertion of sensitive information into a log file in the SMTP server of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a local user who can read the CVE-2026-114471 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 4.7

    Insertion of sensitive information into a log file in the SMTP server of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a local user who can read the server's log, or anyone given a copy of it, to obtain credentials. With SMTP logging enabled, the server hid the credential of an AUTH PLAIN command only when it was sent after EHLO in one exact form, and wrote the rest of the SASL exchange as the client sent it: a PLAIN password sent before EHLO or with extra spacing, the OAuth 2.0 bearer token of AUTH XOAUTH2 and AUTH OAUTHBEARER (from 6.2.0), the SCRAM-SHA-256 client proof (from 6.2.0), which with the logged salt and iteration count allows offline password guessing, and the GSSAPI authenticator (from 6.3.2). SMTP logging is off by default; on Windows before 6.3.6 the log folder was readable by every local user.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026Cross-site request forgery in the REST API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to make an authenticated user's browserCVE-2026-114470 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 5.3

    Cross-site request forgery in the REST API of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote attacker to make an authenticated user's browser perform a state-changing request. The REST API accepts HTTP Basic authentication and answers a browser with a Basic sign-in box; a browser caches the credential once the box is answered and sends it with later requests to that origin, including a top-level form post from another site, and the server reads a request body whatever its declared content type. The cross-site protection covered only the cookie session (a header a cross-site form cannot set, and a SameSite=Strict cookie); HTTP Basic was not held to it. A page under an attacker's control, visited by a user whose browser holds a cached Basic credential for the REST API - typically an administrator who signed in through the box - could therefore cause a state-changing request such as creating a domain, an account or an API key, or changing a setting, with the victim's credential. The attacker cannot read the cross-origin response, so the forgery is blind.

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 21, 2026WP Mailster: Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous TypeCVE-2026-111832 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackCritical 10

    Unrestricted Upload of File with Dangerous Type vulnerability in WP Mailster WP Mailster wp-mailster allows Upload a Web Shell to a Web Server.This issue affects WP Mailster: from n/a through 1.9.1.0.

    Product
    WP Mailster
    Affected
    up to 1.9.1.0
    What to do
    Affects up to 1.9.1.0. Update WP Mailster to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
  • Oct 21, 2026HappyForms: Does not sanitise or escape a user-controlled referral value before embedding it in the form notification emailCVE-2026-14556 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.4

    The HappyForms WordPress plugin before 1.26.15 does not sanitise or escape a user-controlled referral value before embedding it in the form notification email, allowing unauthenticated attackers to inject arbitrary HTML into the emails site administrators receive.

    Product
    HappyForms
    Fixed in
    1.26.15
    What to do
    Update HappyForms to 1.26.15 or newer.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer).CVE-2026-91506 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comHigh 8.1

    Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Workflow. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Workflow. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 8.1 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

    Product
    Workflow
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer).CVE-2026-91496 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comHigh 7.5

    Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Workflow. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Workflow. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 7.5 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:H/A:H).

    Product
    Workflow
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Bulwark Webmail is a self-hosted webmail client for Stalwart Mail Server.CVE-2026-113728 · Other software · bulwarkmail · reported by GitHubHigh 7.5

    Bulwark Webmail is a self-hosted webmail client for Stalwart Mail Server. Prior to 1.9.2, the unauthenticated POST /api/fetch-ical endpoint validates a caller-supplied hostname with one DNS lookup and then passes the URL to fetch, which performs a separate lookup for the socket connection. An attacker controlling authoritative DNS can return a public address during validation and then rebind the hostname to a loopback, private, link-local, or cloud metadata address for the connection, causing the server to return up to 10 MB of an internal HTTP or HTTPS response. The same check-then-fetch pattern also existed in authenticated JMAP login and TOTP token-exchange flows. This issue is fixed in version 1.9.2.

    Product
    webmail
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer).CVE-2026-101809 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comCritical 10

    Vulnerability in the Workflow product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Workflow Notification Mailer). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Workflow. While the vulnerability is in Workflow, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in takeover of Workflow. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 10.0 (Confidentiality, Integrity and Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:N/S:C/C:H/I:H/A:H).

    Product
    Workflow
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Oracle Email Center product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Message Component).CVE-2026-101671 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comMedium 6.1

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Email Center product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Message Component). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Email Center. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Oracle Email Center, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Oracle Email Center accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Oracle Email Center accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

    Product
    Oracle Email Center
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Oracle Email Center product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Message Component).CVE-2026-101670 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comMedium 6.5

    Vulnerability in the Oracle Email Center product of Oracle E-Business Suite (component: Message Component). Supported versions that are affected are 12.2.3-12.2.15. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows low privileged attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Oracle Email Center. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Oracle Email Center accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.5 (Confidentiality impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:L/UI:N/S:U/C:H/I:N/A:N).

    Product
    Oracle Email Center
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing).CVE-2026-101408 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comMedium 6.1

    Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Easily exploitable vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker and while the vulnerability is in Siebel Apps - Marketing, attacks may significantly impact additional products (scope change). Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data as well as unauthorized read access to a subset of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 6.1 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:L/PR:N/UI:R/S:C/C:L/I:L/A:N).

    Product
    Siebel Apps - Marketing
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing).CVE-2026-101403 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comMedium 5.9

    Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks require human interaction from a person other than the attacker. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized access to critical data or complete access to all Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data as well as unauthorized update, insert or delete access to some of Siebel Apps - Marketing accessible data. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 5.9 (Confidentiality and Integrity impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:R/S:U/C:H/I:L/A:N).

    Product
    Siebel Apps - Marketing
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing).CVE-2026-101402 · Other software · Oracle Corporation · reported by secalert_us@oracle.comLow 3.7

    Vulnerability in the Siebel Apps - Marketing product of Oracle Siebel CRM (component: Email Marketing). Supported versions that are affected are 17.0-26.9. Difficult to exploit vulnerability allows unauthenticated attacker with network access via HTTP to compromise Siebel Apps - Marketing. Successful attacks of this vulnerability can result in unauthorized ability to cause a partial denial of service (partial DOS) of Siebel Apps - Marketing. CVSS 3.1 Base Score 3.7 (Availability impacts). CVSS Vector: (CVSS:3.1/AV:N/AC:H/PR:N/UI:N/S:U/C:N/I:N/A:L).

    Product
    Siebel Apps - Marketing
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Modoboa before 2.8.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to create auto-reply messages for arbitrary mailCVE-2026-113599 · Other software · modoboa · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    Modoboa before 2.8.0 contains an insecure direct object reference vulnerability that allows authenticated users to create auto-reply messages for arbitrary mailboxes by supplying another user's mbox value. Attackers can POST to /api/v2/armessages/ to inject attacker-controlled auto-reply subject and content into victims' settings or break their auto-reply management via MultipleObjectsReturned errors.

    Product
    modoboa
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Cypht webmail 2.0.0 through 2.12.2 contains a DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript by craftCVE-2026-113583 · Other software · cypht-org · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    Cypht webmail 2.0.0 through 2.12.2 contains a DOM-based cross-site scripting vulnerability that allows remote attackers to execute arbitrary JavaScript by crafting malicious alt text or URL values in an HTML email's external image tag when ALLOW_EXTERNAL_IMAGE_SOURCES is enabled. Attackers can send a specially crafted email so that when the victim opens it, the externalResources.js code builds the blocked-image notice using innerHTML with decoded email-derived values, triggering script execution in the victim's authenticated session to read mailboxes, send email, or change settings.

    Product
    cypht
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026OpenCATS before 0.10.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in ajax/testEmailSettings.php that allows any authenticated user to send mail through the CVE-2026-112784 · Other software · opencats · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    OpenCATS before 0.10.0 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in ajax/testEmailSettings.php that allows any authenticated user to send mail through the configured SMTP relay. Read-level users can supply testEmailAddress and fromAddress parameters to send the fixed test message to any recipient with a spoofed From address.

    Product
    OpenCATS
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Values entered by visitors were placed into the HTML summary email without being escaped.CVE-2026-113442 · Other software · TYPO3 · reported by f4fb688c-4412-4426-b4b8-421ecf27b14aMedium 5.3

    Values entered by visitors were placed into the HTML summary email without being escaped. An unauthenticated attacker could use this to inject HTML into an email that is shown to the recipient.

    Product
    Extension "TYPO3 Fluid-Form by coding.ms"
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 20, 2026Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 are affected by IMAP command injection.CVE-2026-113386 · Email & office · reported by MITREHigh 7.1

    Roundcube Webmail before 1.6.20 and 1.7.x before 1.7.5 are affected by IMAP command injection. A remote authenticated attacker can exploit this via CRLF sequences injected into the _uid parameter of the mail/headers and mail/viewsource actions to execute arbitrary IMAP commands.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Craft CMS from 5.0.0 before 5.11.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to reuse verification codes because users/verify-email CVE-2026-112775 · Other software · craftcms · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    Craft CMS from 5.0.0 before 5.11.0 contains an authentication bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to reuse verification codes because users/verify-email does not invalidate them for active users. Attackers who obtain a victim's emailed code can submit it to users/set-password after the victim verifies an email change, resetting the password and taking over the account.

    Product
    cms
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Incorrect default permissions in the Windows installer of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allow a local authenticated user to run code as the CVE-2026-107571 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 7.8

    Incorrect default permissions in the Windows installer of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allow a local authenticated user to run code as the mail server's high-privileged accounts when the product is installed in a folder whose permissions are inherited from a writable parent, such as the root of a drive. The installer places the server's programs in the Bin folder of the program folder and gives neither the program folder nor Bin any permissions of their own, so they inherit the parent's. Under the default location, Program Files, ordinary users receive only read and execute and the configuration is not affected; but the installer accepts any path without warning, and a program folder at the root of an NTFS volume inherits write access for a broad group - Authenticated Users (Modify) on a Windows client, Users (create files and folders) on Windows Server. A local user without administrator rights can then alter or replace the service program, which runs as LocalSystem or as the service's virtual account, or the programs an administrator runs elevated from Bin during setup and maintenance, or place a library in Bin that those programs load in place of the system

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Unchecked input for a loop condition in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to stop the server carrying mCVE-2026-107569 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 7.5

    Unchecked input for a loop condition in Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to stop the server carrying mail. The server bounds the mail it generates in response to a message - a rule forward, reply or copy, an account forward, a Sieve redirect, vacation or notify, a bounce, an out-of-office reply - by a counter it carries in the message's X-hMailServer-LoopCount header, and makes no more once the counter reaches the configured rule loop limit (5 by default); that is what ends a forwarding or auto-reply cycle in a bounded number of hops. X-hMailServer-LoopCount is an ordinary header that is not stripped from mail arriving from outside, and the server read it with a signed conversion and no validation, so a count below zero passed every test against the limit: a sender who sets X-hMailServer-LoopCount to a negative value, or on the Linux builds to a value above the 32-bit signed range that the conversion wraps to a negative one, lifts the bound, and a message that enters a generated-mail cycle then loops up to about two thousand million times, each hop a queued message and a delivery, filling the queue and disk and stopping mail

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Missing authorization in the Sieve notify action (6.2.22 through 6.3.6) and in the mail-rule Reply action (6.0.0 through 6.3.6) of Progressive Robot hMailServerCVE-2026-107568 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 6.5

    Missing authorization in the Sieve notify action (6.2.22 through 6.3.6) and in the mail-rule Reply action (6.0.0 through 6.3.6) of Progressive Robot hMailServer allows an authenticated user to send mail through the server as any address. A Sieve notify sends a notification message, and its :from tag names the sender; the server set the notification's From header to that :from as the script wrote it, without checking that the address belongs to the account - the check that the Sieve vacation action applies to its own :from, and that the server applies to the sender of mail queued over COM or sent from the webmail. An account that can store a Sieve script (over ManageSieve, the REST API's self-service filter, or the administration interface) could therefore have the server send a notification from any address, on this server or anywhere; and where the claimed address is at a domain the server hosts with DKIM signing enabled, the server signed the notification with that domain's DKIM key, because it signs by the From header's domain, producing forged mail aligned to pass the domain's DMARC policy. The notify action and this behaviour were introduced in 6.2.22. In the mail-rule engine,

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Use of a less trusted source in the DKIM signing of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have mail theyCVE-2026-107567 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comHigh 7.5

    Use of a less trusted source in the DKIM signing of Progressive Robot hMailServer 6.0.0 through 6.3.6 allows a remote unauthenticated attacker to have mail they write signed with the DKIM key of a domain the server hosts, so that it passes DKIM and DMARC for that domain at other receivers. With DKIM signing enabled for a hosted domain, the server signed every message on its first delivery pass as the domain named in its From header, before local delivery, whatever the message's origin and without checking that its sender had authenticated. A sender anywhere could therefore send the server, as ordinary inbound mail, a message whose From is any address at such a domain, and the server signed it with that domain's key. Every copy the server then sent on to an address outside carried a valid signature aligned with the forged From, whatever the domain's DMARC policy: an account's forward, a mail rule's forward or copy, a Sieve redirect, an alias or distribution list with an outside member, the mirror copy, a managed-list or journal copy, or a message released from quarantine. A signed copy can also be re-sent to other recipients while the domain's key is unchanged. Exploitation needs DK

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Missing authorization in the Sieve editheader action (6.2.22 through 6.3.6) and in the mail-rule Set header value action (6.0.0 through 6.3.6) of Progressive RoCVE-2026-107566 · Other software · Progressive Robot Ltd · reported by cve@gitlab.comMedium 6.5

    Missing authorization in the Sieve editheader action (6.2.22 through 6.3.6) and in the mail-rule Set header value action (6.0.0 through 6.3.6) of Progressive Robot hMailServer allows an authenticated user to make the server send mail as any address, DKIM-signed where the address is at a domain the server signs for. A Sieve script's editheader (addheader/deleteheader) could add or delete any header field except Received and Return-Path, and the server applies a script's header edits before it queues a redirect, so the redirected copy is sent as the script left it. The server signs a message's first delivery pass as the domain named in its From header wherever it signs DKIM for that domain and the message carries no signature of it. A script could therefore delete and re-add From - another account's address, or anyone's at a hosted domain - and redirect, so the server sent the message in that name and, for a hosted domain, signed it with that domain's DKIM key, a forgery aligned to pass the domain's DMARC; or, where another sender's domain is one the server signs for, delete the DKIM-Signature that sender's message arrived with, alter a field, and redirect, so the server re-signed th

    Product
    hMailServer
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Krayin CRM before 2.2.7 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in EmailController write actions that allows scope-restricted authenticated uCVE-2026-112287 · Other software · krayin · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1

    Krayin CRM before 2.2.7 contains a broken object level authorization vulnerability in EmailController write actions that allows scope-restricted authenticated users to manipulate other users' emails by supplying their numeric IDs. Attackers can call update, destroy, mass-update or mass-destroy endpoints to edit, re-send via is_draft=0, trash or permanently delete emails and disclose their subject, body and linked lead and person data.

    Product
    laravel-crm
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026WP Mailster: Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion')CVE-2026-111829 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.5

    Improper Control of Filename for Include/Require Statement in PHP Program ('PHP Remote File Inclusion') vulnerability in WP Mailster WP Mailster wp-mailster allows PHP Local File Inclusion.This issue affects WP Mailster: from n/a through 1.9.1.0.

    Product
    WP Mailster
    Affected
    up to 1.9.1.0
    What to do
    Affects up to 1.9.1.0. Update WP Mailster to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
  • Oct 19, 2026Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Mail component.CVE-2026-85314 · Email & office · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 6.5

    Improper Input Validation vulnerability in Apache Camel Mail component. This issue affects Apache Camel: from 4.0.0 before 4.18.5, from 4.19.0 before 4.22.1. CVE-2026-46584 addressed mail headers reaching the Exchange without passing through a header filter, but the MimeMultipart data format retained an unfiltered path: unmarshalling a multipart message mapped mail.smtp headers onto the Exchange with no filter applied. Those names sit outside the Camel namespace that consumer filters block, so a message crafted by an external sender could still set them, and the mail.smtp namespace influences how a downstream mail producer connects and sends. This is an incomplete fix of CVE-2026-46584 rather than a new class of defect: a deployment that applied that advisory and considered camel-mail settled remained exposed on this path. Upgrade to Apache Camel 4.23.0, which fixes the issue. Users on the 4.18.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.18.5. Users on the 4.22.x LTS releases stream should upgrade to 4.22.1. The MimeMultipart data format now applies the header filter on unmarshal, closing the path CVE-2026-46584 left open. For deployments that cannot upgrade immediately, strip the

    Product
    Apache Camel
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 19, 2026Subscribe to Comments: Does not sanitise newline characters from a notification sender-name setting before using it in e-mail headersCVE-2026-91831 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanLow 3.8

    The Subscribe to Comments WordPress plugin before 2.3.3 does not sanitise newline characters from a notification sender-name setting before using it in e-mail headers, allowing users with Author-level access and above to inject arbitrary e-mail headers, such as a hidden Bcc, and to spoof the sender.

    Product
    Subscribe to Comments
    Fixed in
    2.3.3
    What to do
    Update Subscribe to Comments to 2.3.3 or newer.
  • Oct 18, 2026In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: fbnic: Set AW_FLUSH_MODE alongside AW_FLUSH when flushing the mailbox When tearing doCVE-2026-98615 · Computers, phones & browsers · Linux · reported by 416baaa9-dc9f-4396-8d5f-8c081fb06d67

    In the Linux kernel, the following vulnerability has been resolved: eth: fbnic: Set AW_FLUSH_MODE alongside AW_FLUSH when flushing the mailbox When tearing down the FW mailbox Rx ring, fbnic_mbx_reset_desc_ring() writes AW_CFG with FLUSH set and everything else, BME included, cleared. Clearing BME halts the device's writes to the host but leaves the staged requests parked in the PUL write pipeline rather than draining them, so on the write path FLUSH alone never terminates the outstanding requests and the flush the firmware waits on never completes. Add the FLUSH_MODE definition and set both bits so the staged writes drain out of the pipeline on their own. BME stays cleared, so nothing lands on the host; it is restored later in fbnic_mbx_init_desc_ring() when the ring is rebuilt, once the outstanding writes are gone. The read path is unaffected. AR_CFG has no equivalent mode bit and AR_FLUSH terminates the outstanding reads by itself, so it is left as is. Both writes remain plain stores rather than read-modify-writes. That is deliberate: the matching write in fbnic_mbx_init_desc_ring() restores BME and the TLP attributes, and clears both flush bits as a side effect.

    Product
    Linux
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 17, 2026phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta does not require the current password when changing an account e-mail in the user control panel (UserConCVE-2026-111884 · Other software · thorsten · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    phpMyFAQ before 4.1.9 and 4.2.0-alpha before 4.2.0-beta does not require the current password when changing an account e-mail in the user control panel (UserController::updateData, api/user/data/update), checking only the session and CSRF token. An attacker with a hijacked session can set the e-mail to their own mailbox and use the password-reset flow to take over non-2FA accounts, including superadmin.

    Product
    phpMyFAQ
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 17, 2026Contact Form 7 Signature Addon: Does not sanitize a signature field value before building an email attachment path from itCVE-2026-104246 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.9

    The Contact Form 7 Signature Addon WordPress plugin through 4.2.2 does not sanitize a signature field value before building an email attachment path from it, allowing unauthenticated users to attach arbitrary files (bounded to wp-content on current Contact Form 7) to a form's outgoing email via path traversal; when a form is configured to email a copy to a submitter-controlled address, the attacker can read the targeted file.

    Product
    Contact Form 7 Signature Addon
    Affected
    up to 4.2.2
    What to do
    Affects up to 4.2.2. Update Contact Form 7 Signature Addon to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
  • Oct 16, 2026waynboot-mall through 2.0.0 contains a missing authentication vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrary email by calling the anonymoCVE-2026-111661 · Other software · wayn111 · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    waynboot-mall through 2.0.0 contains a missing authentication vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to send arbitrary email by calling the anonymously mapped /callback/email endpoint. Attackers can POST caller-supplied subject, content, and recipient to EmailController.sendEmail, sending messages from the operator's SMTP account for phishing, spam, and mail quota exhaustion.

    Product
    waynboot-mall
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 16, 2026Mailu is a mail server distributed as a set of Docker images.CVE-2026-86009 · Other software · Mailu · reported by GitHubHigh 8.2

    Mailu is a mail server distributed as a set of Docker images. Prior to f05aeb8322e2f61096af6b089d61ba6f40587d96, domain managers can enable spoofing for hosted domains they do not control. A potentially malicious domain administrator enables spoofing for another hosted domain and can send emails that are authenticated with DKIM/SPF for domains they should not be able to. This vulnerability is addressed by f05aeb8322e2f61096af6b089d61ba6f40587d96.

    Product
    Mailu
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 16, 2026Mailu is a mail server distributed as a set of Docker images.CVE-2026-86008 · Other software · Mailu · reported by GitHubHigh 7.2

    Mailu is a mail server distributed as a set of Docker images. Prior to 8577c929b4ade04d3cd4210cf036601abd793556, a domain manager targeting an administrative account or another domain manager with greater privileges can reset passwords or obtain tokens for that account. This authorization failure allows a domain manager to take over a higher-privileged account and exercise that account's permissions. This vulnerability is addressed by commit 8577c929b4ade04d3cd4210cf036601abd793556.

    Product
    Mailu
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 16, 2026Mattermost versions 11.10.x <= 11.10.0, 11.7.x <= 11.7.9, 11.9.x <= 11.9.1, 11.8.x <= 11.8.5 fail to validate the invited recipient's email address when redeemiCVE-2026-18223 · Other software · Mattermost · reported by responsibledisclosure@mattermost.comMedium 5

    Mattermost versions 11.10.x <= 11.10.0, 11.7.x <= 11.7.9, 11.9.x <= 11.9.1, 11.8.x <= 11.8.5 fail to validate the invited recipient's email address when redeeming team and guest invitation tokens, which allows an authenticated attacker to join a team or gain unauthorized access to private channels via a forwarded or leaked invitation link.. Mattermost Advisory ID: MMSA-2026-00747

    Product
    Mattermost
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 16, 2026YaySMTP – WP Mail SMTP with Email Logs, Tracking & Reports: Arbitrary File UploadCVE-2026-92553 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceHigh 8.8

    The YaySMTP – WP Mail SMTP with Email Logs, Tracking & Reports plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Arbitrary File Upload in all versions up to, and including, 2.7.7 via the putFile function. This is due to insufficient file type validation in the putFile function, as sanitize_file_name() does not strip executable extensions and no allow-list, MIME check, or safe-extension rename is applied. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with subscriber-level access and above, to upload files that may be executable, which makes remote code execution possible. The only server-side guard is a .htaccess file containing 'Require all denied' written by writeGuards(), which is silently ignored by nginx and by Apache configured with AllowOverride None, meaning RCE is fully achievable on those server configurations.

    Product
    YaySMTP – WP Mail SMTP with Email Logs, Tracking & Reports
    Affected
    up to 2.7.7
    What to do
    Affects up to 2.7.7. Update YaySMTP – WP Mail SMTP with Email Logs, Tracking & Reports to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get in touch

Tell us what you're building.

A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.

01The person who'll do the work writes back
02A short call, then a written plan with the price
03Nothing starts until you say yes
04Hacked or down right now? Call, and we pick up the same day
843-331-6339

Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.

What do you need?
Build
Grow
Protect
Urgent

No newsletter, no sales sequence. Just a reply.