Updated 2 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,762exploited flaws on CISA’s list

34added in the last 30 days

344new WordPress flaws this week

390,080entries in the database

1,514 results · page 2 of 31

Oct 27, 2026mews/pos through 2.0.0 contains an insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge payment results bCVE-2026-118377 · Other software · mewebstudio · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
mews/pos through 2.0.0 contains an insufficient verification of data authenticity vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge payment results by submitting unverified callbacks. GarantiPos, PayForPos and InterPos 3D Pay and 3D Host handlers skip check3DHash(), letting attackers post tampered status, amount or order ID fields to complete orders without paying.
Product
pos
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 27, 2026PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release verCVE-2026-94347 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comHigh 7.2
PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, contain a Process Control vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Protection mechanism bypass.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release verCVE-2026-94346 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comHigh 7.2
PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, contain a Path Traversal vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Command execution.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain Virtual Edition
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90727 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comLow 3.8
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Information tampering.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90726 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Path Traversal vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90725 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.9
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.8, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 thCVE-2026-68866 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.5
PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.70, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.30, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.10, contain a Relative Path Traversal vulnerability in the certificate. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through LTS 2026, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions CVE-2026-90732 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.9
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through LTS 2026, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90731 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 4.9
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Stack-based Buffer Overflow vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90730 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.5
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Access Control vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to denial of service.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90729 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.7
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Elevation of privileges.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-90728 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 6.3
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain an Improper Privilege Management vulnerability. A high privileged attacker with local access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to elevation of privileges.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 27, 2026Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1CVE-2026-56084 · Other software · Dell · reported by security_alert@emc.comMedium 5.8
Dell PowerProtect Data Domain, Feature Release versions 7.7.1.0 through 8.7, LTS2024 release versions 7.13.1.0 through 7.13.1.80, LTS2025 release versions 8.3.1.0 through 8.3.1.40, LTS2026 release versions 8.6.1.0 through 8.6.1.20, contain a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability. An unauthenticated attacker with remote access could potentially exploit this vulnerability, leading to Server-side request forgery.
Product
PowerProtect Data Domain
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record dell.com
Oct 24, 2026A flaw has been found in Scada-LTS 2.8.0.CVE-2026-115803 · Other software · reported by VulDBLow 2.1
A flaw has been found in Scada-LTS 2.8.0. Affected by this vulnerability is the function HttpServletRequest.getParameter of the file AmChartValuesAPI.java of the component AmCharts Data API. Executing a manipulation of the argument ids can lead to authorization bypass. The attack can be executed remotely. The exploit has been published and may be used. The vendor announces: "At this moment we are working on new release with security enhancements which will be introduced to the community soon."
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record vuldb.com vuldb.com
Oct 23, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-115478 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubHigh 7.1
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. From 1.0.1 until 1.31.4, `create_entity`, `link_entities`, `rename_entity`, `unlink_entities` and `delete_entity` regenerate memory notes from SQLite at the computed `memory/<type>/<name>.md` path without reliably preserving note ownership or the consistency of a failed lifecycle operation. During shared materialization, a hand-authored note or an orphan left by a different entity whose name sanitized to the same path could have its entire body overwritten on the next write naming that type and name, with non-owned frontmatter preserved. `rename_entity` also seeded the destination path with a direct atomic write without validating ownership and could overwrite a foreign note there. Separately, several tools mutated SQLite before fallible filesystem work: `create_entity` and `link_entities` inserted the row or relation before materialization; `rename_entity` updated the entity, including a retired status, before updating its note; `unlink_entities` removed a relation before rematerializing the source note; and `delete_entity`'s cascade removed the target and its relations before rematerializing
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 23, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-115477 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubHigh 7.1
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. From 1.13.0 until 1.31.4, on a Streamable HTTP deployment with `auth.jwtSecret` configured and a 2026-07-28-era client declaring `elicitation.form` support, a dispatch-gated tool call offered an `inputRequired` confirmation could still complete after the human declined or cancelled, or the elicitation response was omitted or malformed, provided the client echoed the validly bound `requestState` on resubmission. The server trusted an authentic, call-bound state as proof of approval even though that state was minted before the `elicitation/create` leg was asked and proved only that the resubmission belonged to the same call. A client behaving incorrectly or under an attacker's control could therefore execute dispatch-gated destructive vault operations without the human's approval, while still requiring the caller's ordinary tool permissions. Only tools marked `destructive: true` or requiring a scope with a human-in-the-loop floor were reachable through this bypass. The sixteen handler-side conditionally gated tools, including `write_note` overwrite and `move_note`, did not read elicitation state
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 23, 2026When used as an executor in either KNIME Server or KNIME Business Hub, KNIME Analytics Platform LTS versions before 5.8.4 log configured credentials of proxies CVE-2026-115657 · Other software · KNIME · reported by security@knime.comMedium 4.8
When used as an executor in either KNIME Server or KNIME Business Hub, KNIME Analytics Platform LTS versions before 5.8.4 log configured credentials of proxies during startup. An attacker with access to log files can steal the credentials and use the proxy as the user who configured the proxy settings. The issue has been fixed in LTS versions 5.8.4 and 5.12.0 and later.
Product
KNIME Analytics Platform
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record knime.com
Oct 23, 2026OpenStack Ironic through 39.0.1 allows a denial of service via a configdrive that results in a very large amount of uncompressed data, aka a gzip bomb.CVE-2026-115638 · Other software · OpenStack · reported by MITREMedium 4.3
OpenStack Ironic through 39.0.1 allows a denial of service via a configdrive that results in a very large amount of uncompressed data, aka a gzip bomb.
Product
Ironic
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record bugs.launchpad.net
Oct 13, 2026Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Arbitrary file read and write This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.CVE-2026-53564 · Network & remote access · Citrix · reported by secure@citrix.comMedium 5.1
Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Arbitrary file read and write This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.
Product
UniconOS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Oct 13, 2026Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Persistent Command Execution This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.CVE-2026-53563 · Network & remote access · Citrix · reported by secure@citrix.comMedium 6.9
Vulnerability in Citrix UniconOS leading to Persistent Command Execution This issue affects UniconOS: before 2607.2 CR and before 2603 LTSR CU2.
Product
UniconOS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record support.citrix.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current useCVE-2026-75732 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Incorrect Authorization vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.CVE-2026-110082 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a reflected Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. If a low-privileged attacker is able to convince a victim to visit a URL referencing a vulnerable page, malicious JavaScript content may be executed within the context of the victim's browser. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious CVE-2026-110081 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.CVE-2026-110074 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious CVE-2026-110037 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious CVE-2026-109415 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in arbCVE-2026-106634 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeHigh 7.7
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Limitation of a Pathname to a Restricted Directory ('Path Traversal') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary file system write. A low-privileged attacker could leverage this vulnerability to write files to unauthorized locations on the file system. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious CVE-2026-106633 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.CVE-2026-106632 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious CVE-2026-106631 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by a low-privileged attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vCVE-2026-106630 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.3
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vCVE-2026-106629 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.3
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a stored Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability that could be abused by an attacker to inject malicious scripts into vulnerable form fields. Malicious JavaScript may be executed in a victim's browser when they browse to the page containing the vulnerable field, potentially gaining elevated access or control over the victim's account or session. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability.CVE-2026-106628 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeMedium 5.4
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by a DOM-based Cross-Site Scripting (XSS) vulnerability. An attacker could exploit this issue by manipulating the DOM environment to execute malicious JavaScript within the context of the victim's browser. Exploitation of this issue requires user interaction in that a victim must visit a crafted webpage. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability that could rCVE-2026-103848 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 9.9
Adobe Experience Manager is affected by an Improper Neutralization of Special Elements used in an OS Command ('OS Command Injection') vulnerability that could result in arbitrary code execution in the context of the current user. A low-privileged attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
Product
Adobe Experience Manager 6.5 LTS
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record helpx.adobe.com
Oct 13, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-77362 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubMedium 4.3
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, bridge tools do not consistently apply the read access-control list (ACL) to every returned field. The tasks_filter tool exposes group counts derived from denied notes, makemd_query passes unfiltered sibling result fields through, and list_templates exposes template paths and parsed user-function bodies without a read-whitelist check. An authenticated caller can consequently infer or read data from notes outside the caller's read ACL. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by filtering path-attributable fields and applying the read whitelist to list_templates.
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 13, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-77361 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubMedium 4.7
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, read access-control list (ACL) checks use a lexical vault-relative path while containment checks use the resolved path. An in-vault symlink under an allowed glob that resolves into a denied folder can therefore bypass the read ACL and expose files in the denied folder. Exploitation requires an out-of-band-planted symlink and does not permit an escape from the vault root. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by applying ACL checks to the resolved vault-relative path.
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 13, 2026Wazuh 4.0.0 before 4.14.8 fails to invalidate issued tokens for run_as users with zero static roles, because check_token never consults the blacklist.CVE-2026-74037 · Other software · Wazuh · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.6
Wazuh 4.0.0 before 4.14.8 fails to invalidate issued tokens for run_as users with zero static roles, because check_token never consults the blacklist. Attackers with revoked administrator grants can continue authenticating and self-link the administrator role to permanently retain privileged access.
Product
wazuh-manager
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 13, 2026A vulnerability was detected in fit2cloud MeterSphere up to 3.6.9-lts.CVE-2026-109189 · Other software · fit2cloud · reported by VulDBLow 2.1
A vulnerability was detected in fit2cloud MeterSphere up to 3.6.9-lts. The affected element is the function Swagger3ParserApiDefinition.testUrlTimeout of the file backend/parser/api/dataimport/Swagger3ParserApiDefinition.java of the component Swagger3 Parser. Performing a manipulation of the argument swaggerUrl results in server-side request forgery. Remote exploitation of the attack is possible. The exploit is now public and may be used. The vendor was contacted early about this disclosure but did not respond in any way.
Product
MeterSphere
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record vuldb.com vuldb.com
Oct 12, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-77366 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubCritical 9.9
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, tool dispatch does not compare the caller-controlled input.vault value with the vault bound to the caller, the JSON Web Token (JWT) has no vault claim, and the folder access-control list is shared globally. Any valid token can therefore select another configured vault and read, write, or delete its contents through affected tools. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by binding tokens and request context to a vault and rejecting mismatched input.vault values before scope checks.
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 12, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-77364 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubMedium 6.5
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, undefined readPaths and writePaths settings allow all paths, strictReadDefault does not protect direct requests, and the .obsidian, .git, and .trash control directories are excluded only during enumeration. An authenticated caller can directly read sensitive files such as .obsidian/plugins/*/data.json, potentially exposing plugin API keys, Obsidian Sync passwords, and other in-vault data. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by denying the control directories by default and enforcing strictReadDefault on direct request paths.
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 12, 2026obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults.CVE-2026-77363 · Other software · The-40-Thieves · reported by GitHubHigh 8.8
obsidian-tc is a governed, agent-ready Model Context Protocol server for Obsidian vaults. Prior to 1.3.1, the Streamable HTTP transport does not validate the Host or Origin header or enable DNS-rebinding protection. When the documented loopback configuration uses auth.mode set to none, a malicious web page can send requests to the local MCP endpoint and receive unrestricted vault access through the http-local caller. Version 1.3.1 fixes the vulnerability by enabling host, origin, and DNS-rebinding validation.
Product
obsidian-tc
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 11, 2026CloudBeaver through 25.3.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in WebSQLResultServlet that allows any web session holder to read other users' LOB expCVE-2026-108745 · Other software · DBeaver · reported by VulnCheckLow 2.3
CloudBeaver through 25.3.5 contains a missing authorization vulnerability in WebSQLResultServlet that allows any web session holder to read other users' LOB export files from a shared folder. Attackers can guess table and column names and enumerate second-resolution timestamps to download victims' LOB values, including data from connections they cannot query.
Product
CloudBeaver
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com github.com
Oct 9, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the native one-shot CTR packet cipher did not check that the requested input length fitted the counter space the ICVE-2026-71884 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the native one-shot CTR packet cipher did not check that the requested input length fitted the counter space the IV left. In CTR mode the IV and the block counter share one 16-byte block, so an IV of 13 to 15 bytes leaves a counter of only 1 to 3 bytes, addressing 256, 65536 or 16777216 blocks respectively. Given a longer input the counter wrapped and the keystream repeated from the start of the same packet, and the call then returned the full input length as though every byte had been correctly transformed. Two segments of the message were therefore encrypted under the same keystream, so their plaintexts can be recovered from the ciphertext alone, without the key, while the caller saw neither an exception nor a short length to indicate it. The streaming implementation validates at init and again while processing, and the portable AESCTRPacketCipher rejects such a request with "Counter in CTR/SIC mode out of range.", but the native one-shot path has a single entry point and performed no counter-range validation there. It now preflights the IV-derived counter range and rejects an over-long request before any output is written, so the ope
Product
BC-LTS-JAVA
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid.CVE-2026-84244 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.3
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid. An unauthenticated attacker who can influence monitored database traffic could execute malicious script in the browser of an authenticated Guardium user.
Product
Guardium Data Protection
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ibm.com
Oct 5, 2026In Qt for MCUs, a Text element that displays styled text halts the device if an <img> tag in the text contains an attribute with an empty value.CVE-2026-19395 · Other software · qt · reported by a59d8014-47c4-4630-ab43-e1b13cbe58e3Medium 6.6
In Qt for MCUs, a Text element that displays styled text halts the device if an <img> tag in the text contains an attribute with an empty value. The text parser passes the empty value to an internal check that only accepts non-empty values. The check fails and reports an error, and the default error handler halts the device.
Product
Qt for MCUs
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record wiki.qt.io
Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV released the caller's key, IV and aCVE-2026-71883 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.2
In Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.13, the one-shot native packet ciphers for AES-CBC, CCM, CFB, CTR, GCM and GCM-SIV released the caller's key, IV and additional authenticated data arrays with JNI's ReleaseByteArrayElements in mode 0, which commits the native copy back into the Java array. Those arrays are read-only to the native code, and on a JVM that returns a copy rather than a pin the copy still holds the input bytes as they were read. The output buffer is taken through a separate critical region and committed first, so where an application passed the same Java array as both an input and the destination - encrypting in place over KeyParameter.getKey(), for example - the later mode-0 release of the key wrote the unchanged key bytes over the ciphertext that had just been produced. The call still returned the correct output length, so an application encrypting in place over its own key array was handed the raw AES key where it expected ciphertext, with nothing in the API to indicate it, and would transmit or store the key in place of the message. The read-only input arrays are now released with JNI_ABORT, freeing the native copy without copying it back, and mode 0 is rese
Product
BC-LTS-JAVA
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com
Oct 1, 2026Fleet versions before 4.89.0 fail to properly filter MDM command results by team authorization in the commands/results endpoint.CVE-2026-103265 · Other software · fleetdm · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Fleet versions before 4.89.0 fail to properly filter MDM command results by team authorization in the commands/results endpoint. Team-scoped users can read MDM command results for hosts on other teams when a shared command UUID targets hosts across multiple teams, exposing host UUIDs, command payloads, and device responses.
Product
fleet
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record github.com vulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026Insufficient authentication and access control on the internal-only IPC SOAP endpoint of the Genian NAC/ZTNA policy server allows an unauthenticated attacker toCVE-2026-76142 · Other software · Genians, Inc · reported by vuln@krcert.or.krCritical 9.3
Insufficient authentication and access control on the internal-only IPC SOAP endpoint of the Genian NAC/ZTNA policy server allows an unauthenticated attacker to invoke internal functions
Product
Genian NAC 5.0.75 LTS Release
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record docs.genians.com github.com
Sep 30, 2026In ldapd in OpenBSD 7.8 before errata 057 and 7.9 before errata 021, delegated BSD authentication results are correlated only by the LDAP child process client fCVE-2026-103547 · Other software · OpenBSD · reported by MITRECritical 9.2
In ldapd in OpenBSD 7.8 before errata 057 and 7.9 before errata 021, delegated BSD authentication results are correlated only by the LDAP child process client file descriptor and LDAP message ID. After a connection closes, a later connection that reuses the same file descriptor and message ID can receive the earlier authentication result. A remote attacker who can reach ldapd can complete a Bind as another identity. A missing connection can also cause a NULL pointer dereference. (ldapd is not enabled by default.)
Product
OpenBSD
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record ftp.openbsd.org github.com
Sep 30, 2026Possible memory exhaustion in SFTP clients (DefaultSftpClient) in component sshd-sftp in Apache MINA SSHD versions 0.9.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5.CVE-2026-94002 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgHigh 7.5
Possible memory exhaustion in SFTP clients (DefaultSftpClient) in component sshd-sftp in Apache MINA SSHD versions 0.9.0 to 2.19.0 and 3.0.0-M1 to 3.0.0-M5. Apache MINA SSHD is a Java library for client-side and server-side SSH. The sshd-sftp component provides support for SFTP. The SFTP client implementation, when receiving a reply, did not check that this reply corresponded to a request sent earlier. Unsolicited replies would be stored but never consumed. A malicious server could keep sending unsolicited replies until available memory in the client was exhausted. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 2.20.0 or 3.0.0-M6, which fix this issue.
Product
Apache MINA SSHD
What to do
Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD record lists.apache.org openwall.com

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Vulnerability database

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

Tell us what you're building.