Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
2,145 results · page 2 of 43
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.CVE-2026-84035 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a stack-based buffer overflow.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation.CVE-2026-84032 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 5.6
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 could allow a remote attacker to conduct a man-in-the-middle attack due to improper certificate validation.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted dCVE-2026-82900 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2, and 12.1 could allow a remote attacker to delete arbitrary files due to improper limitation of a pathname to a restricted directory.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.CVE-2026-82895 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to a buffer overflow.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection.CVE-2026-81932 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.6
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 is vulnerable to SQL injection. A remote unauthenticated attacker could send specially crafted SQL statements, which could allow the attacker to view, add, modify, or delete information in the back-end database.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection.CVE-2026-80381 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute unauthorized SQL statements due to SQL injection.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal.CVE-2026-75875 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, and 12.2 could allow a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code due to path traversal.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the GIM file-upload functionality.CVE-2026-84275 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to path traversal in the GIM file-upload functionality. An unauthenticated attacker could exploit this vulnerability to write arbitrary files to the Collector.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a sensitive information exposure vulnerability.CVE-2026-84274 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 6.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a sensitive information exposure vulnerability. During SECRET and API_KEY rotation processing, sensitive credential material is logged at INFO level by the edge-controller/edge-manager components. An authenticated attacker with access to the relevant application or container logs could obtain these credentials and use them to impersonate services or gain unauthorized access to the Guardium control plane.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 are vulnerable to missing authentication in the edge-controller component.CVE-2026-84272 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.1 and 12.2.2 are vulnerable to missing authentication in the edge-controller component. An unauthenticated remote attacker could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary container images and gain control of managed edge clusters.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a signature verification bypass in the patch installer.CVE-2026-84271 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a signature verification bypass in the patch installer. An attacker with local access could exploit this vulnerability to execute arbitrary code with root privileges.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable due to weak cryptographic protection and a hard-coded recovery key in the pkcrypto passkey component.CVE-2026-84250 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.4
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable due to weak cryptographic protection and a hard-coded recovery key in the pkcrypto passkey component. A local attacker could exploit this vulnerability to recover the root password and gain root privileges.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component.CVE-2026-84245 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.8
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is vulnerable to a local privilege escalation in the cp_wrapper component. A low-privileged local user could exploit this vulnerability to gain root privileges and access or modify sensitive system files.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid.CVE-2026-84244 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comCritical 9.3
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 IBM Security Guardium Data Protection is vulnerable to stored cross-site scripting (XSS) in the Quick Search results grid. An unauthenticated attacker who can influence monitored database traffic could execute malicious script in the browser of an authenticated Guardium user.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality.CVE-2026-82344 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the S-TAP TrafficTap TDS login reassembly functionality. An unauthenticated remote attacker can send crafted TDS login fragments that exceed the fixed-size reassembly buffer, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution on the affected system.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the MongoDB protocol parser.CVE-2026-82335 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based buffer overflow in the MongoDB protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted MongoDB SCRAM username containing an excessive length and cause memory corruption, potentially resulting in denial of service or arbitrary code execution.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based out-of-bounds read in the TDS7 LOGIN7 protocol parser.CVE-2026-82334 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is vulnerable to a heap-based out-of-bounds read in the TDS7 LOGIN7 protocol parser. A remote attacker could send a specially crafted TDS LOGIN7 packet containing invalid offset or length values, potentially causing information disclosure or denial of service.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is affected by an improper validation of user-supplied pointers in the WfpMonitor kernel driver.CVE-2026-84290 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 5.1
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.0, 12.1, 12.2 is affected by an improper validation of user-supplied pointers in the WfpMonitor kernel driver. Certain METHOD_NEITHER IOCTL handlers dereference user-controlled pointers without adequate probing and exception handling, potentially allowing a privileged local attacker to cause a system crash or perform limited kernel-memory reads.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the SUID-root ssh_config_wrapper component.CVE-2026-84278 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.2
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2 is affected by a command injection vulnerability in the SUID-root ssh_config_wrapper component. An authenticated high-privileged user can inject arbitrary commands through attacker-controlled arguments, resulting in command execution with root privileges.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a denial-of-service vulnerability in the edge-controller.CVE-2026-84276 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 7.5
IBM Guardium Data Protection 12.2.2 is affected by a denial-of-service vulnerability in the edge-controller. An unauthenticated remote attacker with network access to the edge-controller gRPC service can provide malformed task data that triggers an unchecked type assertion, causing the edge-controller process to terminate unexpectedly.
- Product
- Guardium Data Protection
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026FFmpeg before 8.1.3 contains a protection mechanism failure in the HLS demuxer that allows attackers to bypass protocol and allowed_extensions restrictions whenCVE-2026-107697 · Other software · FFmpeg · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
FFmpeg before 8.1.3 contains a protection mechanism failure in the HLS demuxer that allows attackers to bypass protocol and allowed_extensions restrictions when opening child playlists. Attackers can supply a crafted master playlist whose child playlists use disallowed protocols or non-multimedia local files, making parse_playlist() open resources the HLS security policy should block.
- Product
- FFmpeg
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 8, 2026linuxserver Heimdall through 2.8.3 applies its SafeUrlFetcher SSRF protection mechanism only to ItemController; the enhanced-application test and live-stats reqCVE-2026-107449 · Computers, phones & browsers · linuxserver · reported by MITRELow 3.4
linuxserver Heimdall through 2.8.3 applies its SafeUrlFetcher SSRF protection mechanism only to ItemController; the enhanced-application test and live-stats requests occur via SupportedApps::execute(), a GuzzleHttp client that lacks IP address restrictions. In some realistic installations, the POST /test_config (and GET /get_stats) endpoints are accessible through CSRF, and thus an unauthenticated attacker can force the server to send requests to arbitrary internal hosts and ports (including 169.254.169.254) and read a status/port oracle in addition to partial response data.
- Product
- Heimdall
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 7, 2026The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed agaCVE-2025-70522 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.8
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed against the applications. Due to the lack of protection, cross-origin boundary can be completely bypassed, allowing for Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks against any endpoint.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddownload.fanvil.comdarkpoint.ca
Oct 7, 2026The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed agaCVE-2025-70517 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.8
The request handler of Fanvil x7a firmware version 2.6.0.1182 does not enforce any cross-origin resource protection for any state-changing request performed against the applications. Due to the lack of protection, cross-origin boundary can be completely bypassed, allowing for Cross-Site Request Forgery Attacks against any endpoint.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddownload.fanvil.comdarkpoint.ca
Oct 6, 2026In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permission to modify roles could bypass the protections preventing access abuse resulting in CVE-2026-102478 · Other software · Octopus Deploy · reported by security@octopus.comHigh 8.7
In affected versions of Octopus Server, an authenticated user with permission to modify roles could bypass the protections preventing access abuse resulting in privilege escalation. It was possible for the built-in role to be weakened and the attacker's account added to a privileged team. This was achievable due to improper validation of unsafe equivalence in inputs.
- Product
- Octopus Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordadvisories.octopus.com
Oct 6, 2026Mozilla's Node-convict (version 6.2.2 and later) is vulnerable to a Denial of Service vulnerability caused by incomplete prototype‑pollution protections in confCVE-2026-106550 · Computers, phones & browsers · Mozilla · reported by cret@cert.orgHigh 7.5
Mozilla's Node-convict (version 6.2.2 and later) is vulnerable to a Denial of Service vulnerability caused by incomplete prototype‑pollution protections in config.set(). An attacker controlling the configuration key can write arbitrary properties to constructor.<key>, which walk() resolves to the global Object function. This allows overwriting core JavaScript methods such as Object.assign, leading to persistent process-wide failures and requiring a restart. The issue bypasses existing filters that only block constructor.prototype.* and __proto__.*. Exploitation requires an endpoint that forwards attacker-controlled keys into config.set().
- Product
- Node-convict
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 6, 2026Protection mechanism failure in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTMCVE-2026-106408 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comMedium 6.5
Protection mechanism failure in Mobile in Google Chrome on on iOS prior to 155.0.8059.39 allowed a remote attacker to bypass web origin policy via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Medium)
- Product
- Chrome
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordchromereleases.googleblog.comissues.chromium.org
Oct 2, 2026Armatura One stores database and message-broker credentials in an install configuration file, encrypting them with AES-128-CBC when this protection is enabled.CVE-2026-94591 · Computers, phones & browsers · Armatura LLC · reported by ics-cert@hq.dhs.govHigh 8.6
Armatura One stores database and message-broker credentials in an install configuration file, encrypting them with AES-128-CBC when this protection is enabled. The encryption key and initialization vector are fixed values embedded in the software itself and are identical across every installation. An attacker with a copy of the installation package can recover this key and initialization vector, and can then decrypt the stored credentials of any specific installation to which the attacker separately obtains the encrypted configuration file.
- Product
- Armatura One
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Oct 2, 2026Zebra before 6.3.0 contains a protection mechanism failure that allows unauthenticated peers to evade misbehavior scoring by supplying invalid gossiped blocks.CVE-2026-104420 · Other software · ZcashFoundation · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Zebra before 6.3.0 contains a protection mechanism failure that allows unauthenticated peers to evade misbehavior scoring by supplying invalid gossiped blocks. The inbound cleanup step wrongly downcasts RouterError to VerifyBlockError and discards the score, so attackers can repeatedly force block download and Equihash verification without being banned.
- Product
- zebra
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Oct 1, 2026RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen contains a write protection bypass in the SDO (Service Data Object) server implementation 'src/co_sdo_server.c' that fails to properlyCVE-2026-82358 · Other software · RT-Labs AB · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.1
RT-Labs AB C-Open CANopen contains a write protection bypass in the SDO (Service Data Object) server implementation 'src/co_sdo_server.c' that fails to properly validate write permissions when processing download-segment frames. An unauthenticated attacker on the CAN bus can initiate an SDO upload for a read-only Object Dictionary (OD) entry, which sets a data pointer to the read-only object, then send download-segment frames to write to that memory location. The download-segment handler does not verify that a download session is active, allowing any CANopen node to overwrite read-only OD entries using two SDO frames. Note that CANopen protocol operates over CAN bus and does not provide built-in authentication mechanisms. Fixed in 1.1.1.
- Product
- C-Open
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to.CVE-2026-102149 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.4
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently restrict which account a certificate could be assigned to. This could allow an attacker to associate a certificate with another user's account, affecting the confidentiality and integrity of that account's encrypted mail and, where certificate-based login is enabled, potentially permitting unauthorized access to the account.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrCVE-2026-102146 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authenticated Email Protection Gateway administrator holding only limited, delegated permissions could write files with attacker-controlled content to arbitrary locations accessible to the Email Protection Gateway service account. This exceeds the administrator's intended privileges and could be used to alter application files and configuration or to disrupt the availability of the service.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expenCVE-2026-102144 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 5.3
A resource exhaustion vulnerability in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an unauthenticated remote attacker to repeatedly trigger a comparatively expensive server-side operation, causing a partial denial of service.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handlCVE-2026-102143 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An unauthenticated attacker could cause a file with attacker-controlled content to be written to the appliance filesystem through an administrative upload handler that did not properly authenticate the request. This did not by itself result in code execution, which would require a separate vulnerability to place the file in an executable location.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a partyCVE-2026-102139 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.5
An authorization check in the large file exchange feature of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not correctly establish that the requesting user was a party to the package being requested. An authenticated user of that optional feature could read the subject, message body, and attachments of packages they neither sent nor received.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that CVE-2026-102135 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Medium 6.6
On a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway cluster with database replication enabled, a party trusted by the cluster could submit a crafted serialized object that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing code execution as the gateway service account. Replication is disabled by default, and exploitation requires control of a trusted cluster peer or administrative access to the appliance.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied.CVE-2026-102131 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway rejected certain configuration settings, but its validation did not recognize every form in which they could be supplied. An authenticated administrator could potentially use an unrecognized form to have a file of their choosing written to the gateway and executed, resulting in code execution as the gateway service account.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the applicatioCVE-2026-102130 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not sufficiently validate the content of an uploaded backup, and allowed an administrator to influence how the application loaded it. An authenticated administrator could potentially use this to execute arbitrary code on the gateway as the underlying service account.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authCVE-2026-102128 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5
An identity-verification weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed the gateway to act on the Kiteworks platform on behalf of a user it had not authenticated, and to provision a platform account for an identity it did not already know. A remote, unauthenticated sender could potentially exploit this to obtain control of a platform account.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references.CVE-2026-102127 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7
An XML parser used by Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not restrict external entity references. Where an optional, non-default message-processing feature is enabled, a remote and unauthenticated sender could potentially use a crafted message to read files accessible to the gateway service account, including cryptographic key material and credentials, and have them sent to a destination they control.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outsidCVE-2026-102119 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the appCVE-2026-102116 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deseriaCVE-2026-102108 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
An authenticated administrator of Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could submit a crafted serialized object to a cluster management interface that was deserialized without sufficient validation, potentially allowing arbitrary code execution in the context of the gateway service account. Exploitation requires an administrator account holding a specific queue-management privilege.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service.CVE-2026-102106 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Improper authentication in a Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrative service. An administrative service in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway did not consistently enforce administrator authentication, so the required password check could be bypassed. An attacker who referenced a valid administrator account could potentially create, modify, or delete internal users and managed domains and change their security-feature configuration without authenticating; deleting a managed domain also removes its user accounts and could lock administrators out of the gateway.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution.CVE-2026-102097 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Remote Code Execution. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway allowed an authenticated administrator to import configuration whose contents were not sufficiently validated before being processed. A crafted submission could potentially allow arbitrary commands to be executed on the affected gateway.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1
Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.
- Product
- Email Protection Gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comraw.githubusercontent.com
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.