Critical security advisoryCriticalFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is on CISA’s exploited list. Most WordPress hosting runs PHP. See if your site is affectedFlagged by our vulnerability database: PHP2Shell is being exploited. DetailsExploited: PHP2Shell. Check your site
HuttenlocherTechnologies
Updated 3 h ago

Vulnerability database

Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.

1,766exploited flaws on CISA’s list
35added in the last 30 days
585new WordPress flaws this week
391,310entries in the database

6,297 results · page 18 of 126

  • Oct 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, HQC leaked secret-derived data through two side channels: its GF(2^8) arithmetic used lookup tables indexed by field elemCVE-2026-18040 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630Medium 5.9

    In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.86, HQC leaked secret-derived data through two side channels: its GF(2^8) arithmetic used lookup tables indexed by field elements, making the cache line touched a function of the operand, and its fixed-weight support sampler left its duplicate scan as soon as a collision was found and stored accepted positions at a secret index. Both run on secret inputs during encapsulation and decapsulation, and the sampler re-expands the secret key from its seed on every decapsulation, so an attacker able to observe cache behaviour or decapsulation timing can recover information about the HQC private key. The field arithmetic is now table-free and the sampler branch-free within a batch of candidates, with output and randomness consumption unchanged.

    Product
    BC-JAVA
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 3, 2026Unlimited Elements for Elementor: Does not sanitise file paths inside uploaded archives before extracting themCVE-2026-85015 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 6.6

    The Unlimited Elements for Elementor WordPress plugin before 2.0.21 does not sanitise file paths inside uploaded archives before extracting them, allowing authenticated users with access to its asset-management feature (Administrators by default, or Editors when a non-default Unlimited Elements for Elementor WordPress plugin before 2.0.21 setting is enabled) to write arbitrary files, including executable PHP, outside the intended upload directory on servers where the PHP zip extension is unavailable, leading to Remote Code Execution.

    Product
    Unlimited Elements for Elementor
    Fixed in
    2.0.21
    What to do
    Update Unlimited Elements for Elementor to 2.0.21 or newer.
  • Oct 2, 2026UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to make the server request arbitrary internal rCVE-2026-82044 · Other software · UTMStack · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.3

    UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to make the server request arbitrary internal resources by supplying an unvalidated url parameter to the PdfService.downloadPdf() method exposed via GET /api/generate-pdf-report. Attackers can leverage this to force the web-pdf microservice to fetch internal backend endpoints, the OpenSearch cluster, or the cloud instance-metadata service, exposing sensitive internal data rendered into the returned PDF.

    Product
    UTMStack
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in IdentityProviderService.validateMetadataUrl() that allows authenticated attackerCVE-2026-82040 · Other software · UTMStack · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    UTMStack before 11.2.16 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in IdentityProviderService.validateMetadataUrl() that allows authenticated attackers to make the server send requests to arbitrary internal or cloud metadata hosts by supplying a malicious metadata URL to the identity-providers endpoint. Attackers can exploit the POST/PUT /api/identity-providers endpoint with no validation of target host, IP, or scheme to perform internal network port scanning and access cloud instance-metadata services.

    Product
    UTMStack
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Server-side request forgery in the tool server and remote agent connection handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtCVE-2026-103958 · Other software · AWS · reported by ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5High 8.3

    Server-side request forgery in the tool server and remote agent connection handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the credentials of the application's own container role and to read responses from arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted connection address supplied when registering, updating or testing a tool server or remote agent. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later.

    Product
    loom
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Server-side request forgery in the OAuth2 discovery handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the access token ofCVE-2026-103957 · Other software · AWS · reported by ff89ba41-3aa1-4d27-914a-91399e9639e5High 8.2

    Server-side request forgery in the OAuth2 discovery handling in Loom for AWS before 1.7.0 might allow an authenticated remote user to obtain the access token of another user of the deployment and to cause the application to issue requests to arbitrary internal network locations, via a crafted discovery document address supplied when registering a tool server or remote agent configured for delegated authentication. To remediate this issue, users should upgrade to version 1.7.0 or later.

    Product
    loom
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Path traversal in image-downloader 4.3.0 allows an attacker who can control the download URL to cause downloaded response data to be written outside the configuCVE-2026-103648 · Other software · demsking · reported by cve@gitlab.comCritical 9.1

    Path traversal in image-downloader 4.3.0 allows an attacker who can control the download URL to cause downloaded response data to be written outside the configured destination directory.

    Product
    image-downloader
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Buffer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML pageCVE-2026-103631 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Buffer overflow in WebRTC in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Use after free in FedCM in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page.CVE-2026-103630 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Use after free in FedCM in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Out of bounds write in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML CVE-2026-103628 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comCritical 9.6

    Out of bounds write in WebGL in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code outside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: Critical)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page.CVE-2026-103625 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Type confusion in V8 in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Use after free in MediaStream in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML CVE-2026-103623 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Use after free in MediaStream in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Use after free in SVG in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page.CVE-2026-103622 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by chrome-cve-admin@google.comHigh 8.8

    Use after free in SVG in Google Chrome prior to 154.0.8037.97 allowed a remote attacker to execute arbitrary code inside the sandbox via a crafted HTML page. (Chromium security severity: High)

    Product
    Chrome
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026ThemeREX Addons: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-102797 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 6.4

    Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in ThemeREX Group ThemeREX Addons trx_addons allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects ThemeREX Addons: from n/a through 2.46.0.

    Product
    ThemeREX Addons
    Affected
    up to 2.46.0
    What to do
    Affects up to 2.46.0. Update ThemeREX Addons to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows page editors to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs via the url parameterCVE-2026-104470 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows page editors to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs via the url parameter of the Bazar valeur action. Attackers can embed the action with a champ parameter in wiki markup to reach loopback or internal services and partially read responses rendered into the page.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make server-side GET requests by supplying anCVE-2026-104464 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.8

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make server-side GET requests by supplying an unvalidated actor URL to the Bazar abonnements sync action. Attackers can target internal hosts or cloud metadata endpoints and chain attacker-controlled outbox first/next links, with fetched responses stored as readable Bazar entries.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger server requests by sending signed FolCVE-2026-104463 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger server requests by sending signed Follow activities to the public forms actor inbox route. Attackers sign requests with their own keyId while supplying internal actor URLs in the body, reaching internal hosts or cloud metadata via blind GET and POST requests.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in WebfingerService that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger HTTPS requests toCVE-2026-104459 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in WebfingerService that allows unauthenticated attackers to trigger HTTPS requests to internal hosts. Attackers can POST a crafted actor_handle with a numeric host and port to the abonnements view to probe internal HTTPS services and ports.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in validateKeyIdUrl() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the SSRF guard uCVE-2026-104458 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in validateKeyIdUrl() that allows unauthenticated attackers to bypass the SSRF guard using 6to4, NAT64, or IPv4-compatible IPv6 addresses. Attackers can send a crafted Signature keyId to the public actor inbox route to reach cloud metadata, loopback services, or internal hosts.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs CVE-2026-104442 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a syndication action through the render handler's content parameter. Attackers can target internal hosts and ports, read back fetched feed content in the rendered page, and cause feed enclosures to be downloaded into the files directory.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary hostsCVE-2026-104441 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains an unauthenticated server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows remote attackers to make the server fetch arbitrary hosts and ports via the {{valeur}} action's url parameter. Attackers can submit the action through the content parameter of handlers/page/render.php to probe internal HTTP services and read back response content matching fiche markup.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make arbitrary server-side requests viaCVE-2026-104440 · Other software · YesWiki · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    YesWiki before 4.6.7 contains a blind server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to make arbitrary server-side requests via the idtypeannonce parameter of /api/entries/bazarlist. Because isValidURL() always returns true, attackers can supply internal URLs fetched by curl in loadURLContent() to probe internal networks and reach internal services or metadata endpoints.

    Product
    yeswiki
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026The getblock RPC method in zebra-rpc before 11.0.0, used by the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node, panics on verbosity 2 for a side-chain block because the block's CVE-2026-104428 · Other software · ZcashFoundation · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    The getblock RPC method in zebra-rpc before 11.0.0, used by the Zcash Foundation's Zebra node, panics on verbosity 2 for a side-chain block because the block's -1 confirmations sentinel is converted to u32 with .expect(), aborting the process. Remote unauthenticated attackers, directly or through lightwalletd, can repeat this call to keep the node in a crash loop.

    Product
    zebra
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc.CVE-2026-80464 · Other software · HAVELSAN Inc. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trMedium 4.9

    Server-Side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in HAVELSAN Inc. Sef - AI Chatbot Platform allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Sef - AI Chatbot Platform: before 2.1. NOTE: The vendor was contacted and it was learned that the product is not supported.

    Product
    Sef - AI Chatbot Platform
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 2, 2026WebToffee Gift Cards for WooCommerce: Does not validate a user-supplied gift card amount server-side before using itCVE-2026-91020 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 5.3

    The WebToffee Gift Cards for WooCommerce WordPress plugin before 1.3.1 does not validate a user-supplied gift card amount server-side before using it as the cart-item price and store-credit coupon value, allowing unauthenticated users to submit an arbitrary or negative amount, bypassing the configured denominations and manipulating the order total to obtain products without paying.

    Product
    WebToffee Gift Cards for WooCommerce
    Fixed in
    1.3.1
    What to do
    Update WebToffee Gift Cards for WooCommerce to 1.3.1 or newer.
  • Oct 2, 2026OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy.: Does not require authentication or a valid nonce on an action that issues a slow server-side loopback requestCVE-2026-91828 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanHigh 7.5

    The OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy. WordPress plugin before 6.3.11 does not require authentication or a valid nonce on an action that issues a slow server-side loopback request, allowing unauthenticated attackers to exhaust the site's PHP worker pool and make the entire site unavailable.

    Product
    OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy.
    Fixed in
    6.3.11
    What to do
    Update OMGF | GDPR/DSGVO Compliant, Faster Google Fonts. Easy. to 6.3.11 or newer.
  • Oct 2, 2026Motors: Does not sanitise and escape a listing badge setting before outputting it inside an HTML attributeCVE-2026-91022 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WPScanMedium 6.8

    The Motors WordPress plugin before 1.4.124 does not sanitise and escape a listing badge setting before outputting it inside an HTML attribute, allowing users with a custom, administrator-assigned listing-management role to inject arbitrary web scripts that execute when a listing is viewed by any visitor, including an administrator.

    Product
    Motors
    Fixed in
    1.4.124
    What to do
    Update Motors to 1.4.124 or newer.
  • Oct 1, 2026Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directoryCVE-2025-71427 · Other software · GongRzhe · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.6

    Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server through 2.0.7 contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows MCP callers to write and read files outside the working directory by supplying absolute paths or ../ sequences. Attackers can steer an AI agent via prompt injection to abuse save_presentation, open_presentation, or manage_image output_path to overwrite any server-writable file or load external files.

    Product
    Office-PowerPoint-MCP-Server
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026In Devika v1.0, the Feature Agent save_code_to_project function contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to write files outside the intendeCVE-2026-51875 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1

    In Devika v1.0, the Feature Agent save_code_to_project function contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to write files outside the intended project workspace, potentially compromising the entire server.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026In Devika v1.0, the Patcher Agent save_code_to_project function contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to write files outside the intendeCVE-2026-51874 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 7.5

    In Devika v1.0, the Patcher Agent save_code_to_project function contains a path traversal vulnerability that allows attackers to write files outside the intended project workspace.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026Devika v1.0 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in the Coder.save_code_to_project function, which allows attackers to write files outside the intended project CVE-2026-51873 · Other software · reported by MITREHigh 8.8

    Devika v1.0 is vulnerable to Directory Traversal in the Coder.save_code_to_project function, which allows attackers to write files outside the intended project workspace.

    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026Budibase through 3.41.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in AI table generation because the uploadUrl function in packages/server/src/utilitCVE-2026-103757 · Other software · Budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3

    Budibase through 3.41.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in AI table generation because the uploadUrl function in packages/server/src/utilities/fileUtils.ts uses raw node-fetch instead of fetchWithBlacklist. Authenticated builder users can send a prompt to POST /api/ai/tables that places an internal URL in an attachment column, causing the server to fetch it and return a presigned object-storage URL containing the response, such as cloud metadata credentials.

    Product
    budibase
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions from 3.20.2 before 6.51.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in image dimension refetching that allows authenticated staff usersCVE-2026-103291 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    Ghost versions from 3.20.2 before 6.51.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in image dimension refetching that allows authenticated staff users to trigger outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary URLs. Attackers can point image cards at attacker-controlled hosts or internal network endpoints to access metadata services and internal resources unavailable from the public internet.

    Product
    Ghost
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026Ghost versions 1.18.0 before 6.27.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the webhooks feature that allows staff users to probe internal hosts.CVE-2026-103287 · Other software · TryGhost · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1

    Ghost versions 1.18.0 before 6.27.0 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the webhooks feature that allows staff users to probe internal hosts. Attackers with staff privileges can craft webhook requests to access internal network resources from the Ghost server.

    Product
    Ghost
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026Tornado before 6.5.9 contains a path traversal vulnerability in StaticFileHandler that follows symbolic links inside the static root without confirming the resoCVE-2026-103263 · Other software · tornadoweb · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2

    Tornado before 6.5.9 contains a path traversal vulnerability in StaticFileHandler that follows symbolic links inside the static root without confirming the resolved target stays within it. When a symlink pointing outside the static directory exists inside it, unauthenticated attackers can request it to read files such as configuration files, private keys, and application secrets accessible to the process user.

    Product
    tornado
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Oct 1, 2026LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor: Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF)CVE-2026-103082 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2

    Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in LA-Studio LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor lastudio-element-kit allows Server Side Request Forgery.This issue affects LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor: from n/a through 1.6.2.

    Product
    LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor
    Affected
    up to 1.6.2
    What to do
    Affects up to 1.6.2. Update LA-Studio Element Kit for Elementor to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
  • Oct 1, 2026Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 fail to enforce server-side authorization on an administrative passwoCVE-2026-80275 · Other software · Comelit Group S.p.A. · reported by db4dfee8-a97e-4877-bfae-eba6d14a2166High 8.8

    Comelit Multi-User Gateway for VIP System (model 1456B) firmware versions 2.9.1 and 2.10.0 fail to enforce server-side authorization on an administrative password-change function. An authenticated user level can invoke this function to overwrite the installer (administrator) account password.

    Product
    1456B Multi-User Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026The sandbox that isolates document conversion on a Kiteworks appliance did not fully confine the code running inside it.CVE-2026-102125 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 8.8

    The sandbox that isolates document conversion on a Kiteworks appliance did not fully confine the code running inside it. Code already executing within that sandbox could potentially escape its confinement and act with the privileges of the service account that runs the application, which could allow an attacker in that position to read or modify application data and configuration, or to disrupt the service on the affected appliance.

    Product
    Core
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outsidCVE-2026-102119 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2

    A path traversal weakness in an optional, non-default administrative feature allowed an authenticated administrator to move files to unintended locations outside the feature's designated directory. This could potentially be leveraged to execute arbitrary code on the underlying system.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026-A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the appCVE-2026-102116 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.2

    -A weakness could have allowed an authenticated Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway administrator to write a file outside its intended location and cause the application to execute it, potentially resulting in remote code execution as the underlying service account.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102105 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway renders message content that references external resources. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or trigger unintended actions on internal systems.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102104 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway performs an online certificate status check for an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102103 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves a certificate revocation list in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-102102 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). A server-side request forgery (SSRF) weakness in Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway could allow a remote, unauthenticated attacker to induce the gateway to issue crafted requests to internal or otherwise unintended network destinations. The requests are triggered while the gateway retrieves an issuer certificate in an inbound message. Depending on the services reachable from the gateway, this could disclose sensitive internal information or disrupt gateway operation.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-102095 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725Critical 9.1

    Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery. Kiteworks Email Protection Gateway performed server-side fetches of URLs contained in the message content it processed, without adequately restricting the fetch destination. A remote, unauthenticated sender could craft a message that caused the gateway to issue requests to internal services and cloud instance metadata endpoints and return the responses, potentially disclosing sensitive internal data and, depending on the internal service reached, affecting its state.

    Product
    Email Protection Gateway
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the sCVE-2026-102091 · Other software · Kiteworks · reported by 9119a7d8-5eab-497f-8521-727c672e3725High 7.5

    Kiteworks Secure Data Forms before version 9.5.0 is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery that could allow an unauthenticated, remote attacker to make the server issue arbitrary outbound network requests and read back the responses. This could potentially be used to reach internal-only services or other network-restricted resources.

    Product
    Secure Data Forms
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs bCVE-2023-54402 · Other software · iDocView · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7

    iDocView contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in its /doc/upload endpoint that allows remote unauthenticated attackers to fetch arbitrary URLs by supplying a hardcoded default token value (testtoken) to bypass authentication. Attackers can exploit the unrestricted URL scheme handling, including file:// URIs, to read arbitrary local files such as operating-system and application configuration files, and to reach internal network hosts and services not otherwise accessible. Exploitation evidence was first observed by the Shadowserver Foundation on 2024-03-26.

    Product
    iDocView
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation eCVE-2026-101883 · Other software · OpenClaw · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3

    OpenClaw Windows Node through 2026.9.4 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the canvas.present capability that bypasses URL risk evaluation enforced by canvas.navigate. Attackers with gateway or agent access can issue canvas.present to make the node's WebView send requests to localhost, private networks, or tailnet services from the user's machine.

    Product
    OpenClaw Windows Node
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026Kobako is a Ruby gem that embeds a Wasm-isolated mruby interpreter inside applications, allowing execution of untrusted Ruby scripts (LLM-generated code, user fCVE-2026-55107 · Other software · elct9620 · reported by GitHubCritical 10

    Kobako is a Ruby gem that embeds a Wasm-isolated mruby interpreter inside applications, allowing execution of untrusted Ruby scripts (LLM-generated code, user formulas, student submissions, third-party plugins) in-process without giving them access to host memory, files, network, or credentials. From version 0.1.0 to before version 0.9.1, a guest mruby script running inside the Kobako sandbox can execute arbitrary Ruby in the host process, fully escaping the sandbox. This issue has been patched in version 0.9.1.

    Product
    kobako
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
  • Sep 30, 2026LightLLM through 1.2.0 fails to validate image_url and audio_url parameters in multimodal endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side rCVE-2026-103243 · Other software · ModelTC · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9

    LightLLM through 1.2.0 fails to validate image_url and audio_url parameters in multimodal endpoints, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to fetch internal resources, with vision model processing disclosing content or error responses revealing internal network topology.

    Product
    LightLLM
    What to do
    Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.

Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.

Weekly security brief

The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.

One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.

Get in touch

Tell us what you're building.

A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.

01The person who'll do the work writes back
02A short call, then a written plan with the price
03Nothing starts until you say yes
04Hacked or down right now? Call, and we pick up the same day
843-331-6339

Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.

What do you need?
Build
Grow
Protect
Urgent

No newsletter, no sales sequence. Just a reply.