Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9,142 results · page 16 of 183
Aug 3, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.CVE-2026-66325 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comMedium 6.1
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based) allows an unauthorized attacker to perform spoofing over a network.
- Product
- Microsoft Edge (Chromium-based)
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation.CVE-2026-48331 · Other software · Adobe · reported by AdobeCritical 10
Adobe Campaign Classic (ACC) is affected by a Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability that could result in privilege escalation. Exploitation of this issue does not require user interaction. Scope is changed.
- Product
- Adobe Campaign Classic
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026Shlink contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated API key holders to cause the server to issue arbitrary HTTP GET requests bCVE-2026-18736 · Other software · shlinkio · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
Shlink contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated API key holders to cause the server to issue arbitrary HTTP GET requests by supplying a crafted long URL during short URL creation with title auto-resolution enabled. Attackers can submit URLs pointing to public hosts that redirect to internal targets, including loopback addresses, link-local ranges, and cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254, to exfiltrate internal service information via the HTML title element returned in the short URL creation response.
- Product
- Shlink
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026CTI-Transmute contained a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the administrative user deletion functionality.CVE-2026-69082 · Other software · misp · reported by 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8High 8.8
CTI-Transmute contained a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the administrative user deletion functionality. The /account/delete/<id> endpoint accepted HTTP GET requests for an operation that modified application state. An unauthenticated remote attacker could construct a malicious link or embed a request targeting this endpoint and induce an authenticated CTI-Transmute administrator to visit the attacker-controlled content. If the administrator had an active session, the browser would automatically include the administrator’s session credentials, causing the selected user account to be deleted without the administrator intentionally confirming the operation. Successful exploitation requires interaction from a currently authenticated administrator who has permission to delete users. The attacker does not need a CTI-Transmute account or administrative privileges because the forged request executes using the victim administrator’s session. The vulnerability could allow an attacker to delete arbitrary user accounts, resulting in unauthorized modification of application state and denial of access for affected users. Depending on whether administrators can delete other admin
- Product
- cti-transmute
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026CTI-Transmute is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the evaluation report PDF-generation functionality.CVE-2026-69078 · Other software · misp · reported by 5a6e4751-2f3f-4070-9419-94fb35b644e8High 8.8
CTI-Transmute is affected by a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the evaluation report PDF-generation functionality. User-controlled CTI content, including conversion names, descriptions, and comments, is converted from Markdown to HTML and rendered as a PDF using WeasyPrint. Before the patch, the renderer used WeasyPrint’s default URL-fetching behavior without restricting the protocols or destinations that could be referenced by the generated HTML. An attacker able to supply content included in an evaluation report could inject crafted resource references using schemes such as http://, https://, or file://. When the report was rendered, CTI-Transmute could fetch these resources using the application server’s network connectivity and filesystem privileges. Successful exploitation could allow an attacker to: * access services available only from the CTI-Transmute server or its internal network; * probe internal hosts and service endpoints; * retrieve local files readable by the application process; and * expose fetched content through the generated PDF, depending on the referenced resource type and rendering context. The vulnerability is corrected by pro
- Product
- cti-transmute
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, IESEngine stream-mode MAC forgery via length-dependent KDF split.CVE-2026-12816 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, IESEngine stream-mode MAC forgery via length-dependent KDF split. This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 3, 2026In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, KCCMBlockCipher MAC does not bind nonce when AAD is absent (cross-nonce AEAD forgery).CVE-2026-12803 · Other software · Legion of the Bouncy Castle Inc. · reported by 91579145-5d7b-4cc5-b925-a0262ff19630High 8.7
In Bouncy Castle for Java before 1.85, KCCMBlockCipher MAC does not bind nonce when AAD is absent (cross-nonce AEAD forgery). This issue also affects Bouncy Castle for Java LTS before 2.73.12.
- Product
- BC-JAVA
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 1, 2026Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token.CVE-2026-55735 · Other software · ueberauth · reported by 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49dbHigh 8.2
Improper Verification of Cryptographic Signature in ueberauth guardian allows an unauthenticated attacker to revoke a victim's session with a forged token. Guardian.revoke/3 in lib/guardian.ex decodes the supplied token with peek/1, which performs no signature verification (it only base64-decodes the JWT header and payload). The resulting unverified claims are forwarded directly to the configured token module's revoke callback and the implementation's on_revoke callback, a state-mutating sink. The sibling operations refresh/2 and exchange/4 both call decode_and_verify first, so the signature is checked before anything acts on the claims; revoke/3 is the only state-mutating path that acts on claims without verifying the signature. An attacker who knows or guesses a victim's identifying claim values (jti, sub) can forge a JWT carrying those claims, sign it with an arbitrary key, and submit it to any endpoint that funnels a caller-supplied token into Guardian.revoke/3 (the standard logout / session-revocation pattern). When the token module mutates state keyed by the claims (whitelist deletion or blacklist insertion, for example a GuardianDb-style store), the victim's legitimate ses
- Product
- guardian
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcna.erlef.orggithub.com
Aug 1, 2026Budibase before 3.38.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the REST datasource integration that fails to validate HTTP redirects against theCVE-2026-67311 · Other software · Budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Budibase before 3.38.1 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the REST datasource integration that fails to validate HTTP redirects against the IP blacklist. Attackers with Builder role can configure a REST datasource pointing to an external server that returns a redirect to internal IP addresses, bypassing blacklist protection to access cloud metadata endpoints and internal services.
- Product
- budibase
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 1, 2026AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for: Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE-2026-15988 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceHigh 8.8
The AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for WordPress plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.6.5 This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the reauth_for_authorize function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to create new administrator accounts with attacker-supplied credentials via a CSRF-based REST authentication bypass, granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link. This bypass can be combined with WordPress's ?_method=POST method-override support to convert a top-navigation GET request into an authenticated POST to the REST users endpoint, requiring no existing account on the attacker's part.
- Product
- AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for
- Affected
- up to 3.6.5
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.6.5. Update AI Engine – The Chatbot, AI Framework & MCP for to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 1, 2026Theme Editor: Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE-2025-14469 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The Theme Editor plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.1. This is due to missing nonce validation on the ms_update AJAX action. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify child theme CSS styles via a forged request granted they can trick an administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
- Product
- Theme Editor
- Affected
- up to 3.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.1. Update Theme Editor to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 31, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the xxl-job-admin/jobinfo/trigger component of xxl-job v3.4.0 allows authenticated attackers to scan resources via supplCVE-2026-52371 · Other software · reported by MITREMedium 6.5
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in the xxl-job-admin/jobinfo/trigger component of xxl-job v3.4.0 allows authenticated attackers to scan resources via supplying a crafted HTTP request.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 31, 2026PrestaShop module, totadministrativemandate <1.8.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF).CVE-2026-50986 · Websites & servers · reported by MITREHigh 8.8
PrestaShop module, totadministrativemandate <1.8.1 is vulnerable to Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF). The payment validation controller has no CSRF token. An attacker can confirm an order in an awaiting status by hijacking a link.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordaddons.prestashop.comprestafence.com
Jul 31, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery in the PDF export component in maalfer Pentestify before 1.1.0 allows authenticated users to cause outbound HTTP GET requests from tCVE-2026-59231 · Other software · ccyl13 · reported by 4daa8cea-433a-44bd-9456-53b127fc289aMedium 5.3
Server-Side Request Forgery in the PDF export component in maalfer Pentestify before 1.1.0 allows authenticated users to cause outbound HTTP GET requests from the server to arbitrary attacker-chosen destinations via unvalidated URLs stored in the finding images field or the report client_logo field, which the server-side headless browser fetches while rendering the report.
- Product
- Pentestify
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 31, 2026A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in multiple PHP Jabbers scripts.CVE-2025-67651 · Websites & servers · PHP Jabbers · reported by cvd@cert.plMedium 6.9
A Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability has been identified in multiple PHP Jabbers scripts. The lack of CSRF tokens or appropriate SameSite attributes allows an attacker to send unauthorized requests in the context of an authenticated user, leading to unauthorized administrative actions, such as creating new admin accounts. This issue was fixed in the versions specified in the affected products list.
- Product
- Appointment Scheduler
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the generic HTTP source and tool components of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.3.0 through 1.4.0.CVE-2026-14540 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by cve-coordination@google.comHigh 8
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability exists in the generic HTTP source and tool components of Google mcp-toolbox versions 0.3.0 through 1.4.0. While the toolbox implements baseline input sanitization for user-controlled parameters, the underlying HTTP client (internal/sources/http/http.go) fails to safely regulate request redirection boundaries. Specifically, the client is initialized without a restrictive CheckRedirect policy hook and lacks target IP validation. An attacker or a malicious data-driven prompt can supply a crafted path parameter that triggers an open redirect or a direct destination swap on the target backend, coercing the mcp-toolbox into blindly following the redirection and making unauthorized requests to internal or arbitrary external endpoints.
- Product
- mcp-toolbox
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026Leantime 3.6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authentiCVE-2026-66416 · Other software · Leantime · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.6
Leantime 3.6.2 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to perform state-changing actions on behalf of authenticated users by excluding the Laravel VerifyCsrfToken middleware from the global middleware stack in app/Http/Kernel.php. Attackers can craft malicious pages delivered via phishing emails or malicious websites to trigger unauthorized POST, PUT, and DELETE requests that create or delete projects, modify settings, and change permissions as any authenticated user.
- Product
- Leantime
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026Leantime 3.6.2 contains a server-side request forgery and local file inclusion vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to read internal resources by pCVE-2026-66415 · Other software · Leantime · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
Leantime 3.6.2 contains a server-side request forgery and local file inclusion vulnerability that allows authenticated attackers to read internal resources by passing unsanitized user-supplied filenames to file_get_contents() in the Blueprints::import() method without path validation. Attackers can submit crafted filenames containing URL wrappers or path traversal sequences through the JSON-RPC API endpoint to access cloud metadata services or read arbitrary files from the server filesystem.
- Product
- Leantime
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026Kanboard 1.2.52 and prior contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF protections by supplying hexadecimCVE-2026-57862 · Other software · Kanboard · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
Kanboard 1.2.52 and prior contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows authenticated users to bypass SSRF protections by supplying hexadecimal IP address notation in user-controlled URLs. Attackers can submit hexadecimal-encoded internal IP addresses through the web link creation feature, causing cURL to resolve and connect to internal network resources such as cloud instance metadata services, localhost services, and RFC1918 addresses while the isPrivateURL() filter in app/Core/Http/Client.php incorrectly treats the input as safe due to FILTER_VALIDATE_IP rejecting non-dotted-decimal notation.
- Product
- Kanboard
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgist.github.comgithub.com
Jul 30, 2026Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Zeppelin.CVE-2026-44613 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 6.1
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Apache Zeppelin. The default CORS configuration allowed cross-origin state-changing requests and accepted text/plain request bodies, allowing an attacker who lures an authenticated user to a malicious site to perform actions on the user's behalf through REST and WebSocket endpoints. This issue affects Apache Zeppelin versions 0.6.0 through 0.12.0. Users are recommended to upgrade to version 0.12.1, which fixes this issue.
- Product
- Apache Zeppelin
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comlists.apache.org
Jul 30, 2026Swarms through 6.8.1, fixed in commit 8b0fc9e, contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the _is_safe_url function that fails to validate hostnameCVE-2026-67346 · Other software · kyegomez · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.7
Swarms through 6.8.1, fixed in commit 8b0fc9e, contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the _is_safe_url function that fails to validate hostnames through DNS resolution, allowing attackers to bypass the blocklist. Attackers can supply user-controlled image or audio URLs that resolve to private, loopback, or metadata addresses to reach internal services and exfiltrate credentials.
- Product
- swarms
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in malach-it Boruta allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause the OAuth/OpenID authorization server to issue CVE-2026-54885 · Other software · malach-it · reported by 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49dbMedium 6.9
Server-Side Request Forgery vulnerability in malach-it Boruta allows an unauthenticated remote attacker to cause the OAuth/OpenID authorization server to issue outbound HTTP requests to attacker-chosen URIs, including internal services and cloud metadata endpoints. Three code paths fetch remote URIs supplied by the requester without sufficient validation of the target. Boruta.Oauth.Request.Base.fetch_unsigned_request/1 in lib/boruta/oauth/request/base.ex dereferences the OAuth request_uri parameter from the authorization request via Finch.build(:get, request_uri) |> Finch.request(OpenIDHttpClient). Boruta.Openid.parse_registration_params/2 in lib/boruta/openid.ex dereferences the jwks_uri supplied in an OpenID Connect dynamic client registration request. Boruta.Ecto.Clients.refresh_jwk_from_jwks_uri/1 in lib/boruta/adapters/ecto/clients.ex later refreshes the stored jwks_uri for an existing client. In all three paths the only validation is that the URI parses with a scheme (and one of the two request_uri clauses does not even restrict the scheme to http or https). The implementations do not require HTTPS, do not enforce a host or IP allowlist, do not reject loopback, private, link
- Product
- boruta
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcna.erlef.orggithub.com
Jul 30, 2026IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to perform SSRF aCVE-2026-14980 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comHigh 8.3
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to perform SSRF attacks with elevated privileges when the collectiveController-1.0 feature is enabled.
- Product
- WebSphere Application Server - Liberty
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Softtr Information Technology Trade Ltd.CVE-2026-5219 · Websites & servers · Softtr Information Technology Trade Ltd. Co. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trHigh 8.3
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Softtr Information Technology Trade Ltd. Co. E-Commerce Pack allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects E-Commerce Pack: before 5.03.01.49.
- Product
- E-Commerce Pack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 30, 2026CentreStack before 17.5 contains a hardcoded cryptographic key vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge arbitrary encrypted tokens by exploiCVE-2026-54363 · Other software · Gladinet · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
CentreStack before 17.5 contains a hardcoded cryptographic key vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers to forge arbitrary encrypted tokens by exploiting a static SysNumber value used as entropy for AccessTicket.Encrypt() and AccessTicket.Decrypt() across all installations. Attackers can use the hardcoded key to craft valid x-glad-auth headers and call privileged API endpoints such as acquiretenantbackuptoken to obtain a domain administrator IdentityTicket, enabling a complete unauthenticated remote code execution chain.
- Product
- CentreStack
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcentrestack.comvulncheck.com
Jul 30, 2026FuseWP: Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE-2026-5582 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The FuseWP plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 1.1.24.2. This is due to missing nonce verification on the toggle_sync_status() function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to toggle the status of sync rules (enable/disable) via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
- Product
- FuseWP
- Affected
- up to 1.1.24.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.1.24.2. Update FuseWP to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 29, 2026V through 0.5.2, fixed in commit 85859f0, contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to circumvent host-based alloCVE-2026-67201 · Other software · vlang · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.7
V through 0.5.2, fixed in commit 85859f0, contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) bypass vulnerability that allows attackers to circumvent host-based allowlists by exploiting a parser differential between net.urllib and net.http. Attackers can craft a URL containing a backslash in the authority section such that net.urllib.parse() extracts the trusted host for allowlist validation while net.http.get() normalizes the backslash and connects to the internal host, enabling access to internal network services that the allowlist was intended to block.
- Product
- v
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 29, 2026IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute maliciCVE-2026-2482 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comLow 3.1
IBM WebSphere Application Server - Liberty 17.0.0.3 through 26.0.0.8 is vulnerable to cross-site request forgery which could allow an attacker to execute malicious and unauthorized actions transmitted from a user that the website trusts.
- Product
- WebSphere Application Server - Liberty
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 29, 2026A vulnerability in the Agent Development Kit (ADK) allows for continuation forgery in tool confirmations.CVE-2026-18236 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by cve-coordination@google.comCritical 9.3
A vulnerability in the Agent Development Kit (ADK) allows for continuation forgery in tool confirmations. An attacker who is able to manipulate or inject events into the session history can execute unauthorized tools by forging a tool confirmation response. This is possible because the framework did not verify if the target tool was registered to the executing agent, did not validate if the tool actually required confirmation, and did not match the confirmation arguments against the original tool call event in the history.
- Product
- Google-ADK
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 29, 2026Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Gleam allows an adversary in the middle to substitute forged Hex package contents during dependeCVE-2026-59247 · Other software · gleam-lang · reported by 6b3ad84c-e1a6-4bf7-a703-f496b71e49dbHigh 7.6
Insufficient Verification of Data Authenticity vulnerability in Gleam allows an adversary in the middle to substitute forged Hex package contents during dependency resolution. During dependency resolution Gleam fetches package metadata from the signature-verified Hex repository, which covers each release's dependency requirements and SHA-256 outer_checksum. After resolving versions, gleam_cli::dependencies::lookup_package makes a second request to the unsigned Hex API through gleam_core::hex::get_package_release and records the outer_checksum and dependency names from that JSON response into manifest.toml, instead of the values from the verified repository metadata. The Hex repository signature does not cover the API response. An adversary in the middle who can intercept TLS with a certificate trusted by the Gleam process (for example a TLS-inspecting proxy using a CA in the operating system trust store or added through GLEAM_CACERTS_PATH), and who can modify both the API release response and the corresponding repository tarball, can supply a package archive with a matching forged checksum without the Hex repository signing key. Gleam verifies the forged tarball against the forge
- Product
- gleam
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcna.erlef.orggithub.com
Jul 29, 2026WP CTA: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-6089 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.9
The WP CTA plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery via the 'sticky_s_media' parameter in imported JSON files in all versions up to, and including, 2.1.2. This is due to the import_sidebars() function passing user-supplied URLs from imported JSON data to file_get_contents() with only FILTER_VALIDATE_URL validation (which allows internal IPs). This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and modify information from internal services. The response content is saved as a WordPress media attachment, making this a full-read SSRF.
- Product
- WP CTA
- Affected
- up to 2.1.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.1.2. Update WP CTA to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 29, 2026Joomla Extension - aimy-extensions.com - RCE via PHP object injection in Aimy Captcha-Less Form Guard 18.0 - 20.0 - A forged clfgd field allows PHP objection inCVE-2026-65883 · Websites & servers · reported by security@joomla.orgCritical 10
Joomla Extension - aimy-extensions.com - RCE via PHP object injection in Aimy Captcha-Less Form Guard 18.0 - 20.0 - A forged clfgd field allows PHP objection injection and thereby remote code execution.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 29, 2026The FAB auth manager's Azure AD OAuth login defaulted `verify_signature=False` when decoding the ID token, so an attacker able to present a forged or unsigned (CVE-2026-59243 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgCritical 9.8
The FAB auth manager's Azure AD OAuth login defaulted `verify_signature=False` when decoding the ID token, so an attacker able to present a forged or unsigned (`alg:none`) ID token to the OAuth callback could bypass authentication and log in as an arbitrary user, including one holding the Admin role (CWE-347). Deployments running the FAB auth manager with the Azure AD OAuth login path under its default configuration are affected; the Authentik path already defaulted to `True`. This issue affects `apache-airflow-providers-fab` before 3.7.3. Users are advised to upgrade to `apache-airflow-providers-fab` 3.7.3, which defaults `verify_signature=True`.
- Product
- Apache Airflow FAB provider
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comlists.apache.org
Jul 29, 2026Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica: Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE-2026-9720 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 2.0.2. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the (global scope, included by fvcr_admin_page_html) function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to modify the plugin's configuration, including API tokens, access tokens, economic activity, Hacienda environment mode, invoice and ticket emission flags, exchange rate, and branch settings via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
- Product
- Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica
- Affected
- up to 2.0.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.0.2. Update Facturación Electrónica Costa Rica to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 28, 2026Media Cleaner: Clean your WordPress!: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-4912 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.1
The Media Cleaner: Clean your WordPress! plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 7.0.3. This is due to the `get_urls_from_html()` function using `DOMDocument::loadHTMLFile()` to fetch iframe source URLs with an insufficient hostname validation check that relies on a substring match against the site's server name. This makes it possible for authenticated attackers, with Administrator-level access and above, to make web requests to arbitrary locations originating from the web application, which can be used to query and interact with internal services.
- Product
- Media Cleaner: Clean your WordPress!
- Affected
- up to 7.0.3
- What to do
- Affects up to 7.0.3. Update Media Cleaner: Clean your WordPress! to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 28, 2026The terraform-mcp-server before version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a server-side request forgery issue in the streamable-HTTP transport that may allow an unauthentiCVE-2026-14869 · Other software · HashiCorp · reported by security@hashicorp.comHigh 8.6
The terraform-mcp-server before version 1.1.0 is vulnerable to a server-side request forgery issue in the streamable-HTTP transport that may allow an unauthenticated remote client to redirect the server's Terraform API requests, and the server-side authorization token, to an attacker-controlled endpoint. This vulnerability, CVE-2026-14869, is fixed in terraform-mcp-server 1.1.0.
- Product
- Tooling
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 28, 2026Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent: Cross-Site Request ForgeryCVE-2026-15136 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 4.3
The Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Cross-Site Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 4.3.7. This is due to missing or incorrect nonce validation on the process_bulk_action function. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to permanently delete or forcibly resolve arbitrary GDPR data request records stored in the wpl_data_req table via a forged request granted they can trick a site administrator into performing an action such as clicking on a link.
- Product
- Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent
- Affected
- up to 4.3.7
- What to do
- Affects up to 4.3.7. Update Cookie Banner for GDPR / CCPA – WPLP Cookie Consent to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FormCraft <= 3.9.15 versions.CVE-2026-65442 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in FormCraft <= 3.9.15 versions.
- Affected
- up to 3.9.15
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.9.15. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Simple Link Directory Pro <= 15.0.6 versions.CVE-2026-61953 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Simple Link Directory Pro <= 15.0.6 versions.
- Affected
- up to 15.0.6
- What to do
- Affects up to 15.0.6. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026JFrog Artifactory support for Terraform remote repositories was found to be susceptible to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-65924 · Other software · jfrog · reported by reefs@jfrog.comMedium 6.5
JFrog Artifactory support for Terraform remote repositories was found to be susceptible to Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF). An authenticated user - or, if anonymous access is enabled on the repository, an unauthenticated user - could cause Artifactory to issue outbound HTTP requests to arbitrary destinations and receive the response content.
- Product
- artifactory
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddocs.jfrog.comdocs.jfrog.com
Jul 27, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and credential exfiltration vulnerability exists in the cloud-healthcare-fhir-fetch-page tool of googleapis/mcp-toolbox.CVE-2026-16481 · Computers, phones & browsers · Google · reported by cve-coordination@google.comMedium 6
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) and credential exfiltration vulnerability exists in the cloud-healthcare-fhir-fetch-page tool of googleapis/mcp-toolbox. The tool takes an unvalidated pageURL parameter from the client and issues an HTTP GET request to it using an authenticated client. The underlying transport automatically attaches an Authorization: Bearer header to every outbound request regardless of the destination host. An attacker can supply an arbitrary external URL to the pageURL parameter (either directly via the tool execution payload or implicitly via data-driven pagination tracking loops), leading Toolbox into sending its OAuth/service-account access token to an attacker-controlled listener. Depending on the configuration, this leaks either the end-user's token or the broader service-account access token (ADC), potentially exposing Protected Health Information (PHI) and secondary Google Cloud Platform services.
- Product
- MCP Toolbox for Databases (googleapis/mcp-toolbox)
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Insert Headers and Footers Code – HT Script <= 1.1.8 versions.CVE-2026-66474 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 4.3
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Insert Headers and Footers Code – HT Script <= 1.1.8 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.1.8
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.1.8. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Feedzy <= 5.2.4 versions.CVE-2026-66437 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 4.9
Contributor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Feedzy <= 5.2.4 versions.
- Affected
- up to 5.2.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 5.2.4. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Google Review Slider <= 18.4 versions.CVE-2026-66428 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 4.3
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in WP Google Review Slider <= 18.4 versions.
- Affected
- up to 18.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 18.4. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in AffiliateX <= 2.3.5 versions.CVE-2026-65558 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in AffiliateX <= 2.3.5 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.3.5
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.3.5. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 27, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in 3D Flipbook PDF Viewer & Embedder <= 1.4.2 versions.CVE-2026-59552 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.2
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in 3D Flipbook PDF Viewer & Embedder <= 1.4.2 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.4.2
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.4.2. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Jul 24, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Data Quality allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.CVE-2026-57106 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comCritical 10
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Data Quality allows an unauthorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
- Product
- Microsoft Purview Data Governance
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 23, 2026Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Search allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.CVE-2026-56167 · Computers, phones & browsers · Microsoft · reported by secure@microsoft.comHigh 8.5
Server-side request forgery (ssrf) in Azure AI Search allows an authorized attacker to elevate privileges over a network.
- Product
- Azure AI Search
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Jul 23, 20269Router before 0.4.72 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /v1/web/fetch endpoint.CVE-2026-63313 · Other software · decolua · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
9Router before 0.4.72 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the /v1/web/fetch endpoint. The endpoint accepts a user-controlled url parameter and passes it to a configured external scraping provider (Firecrawl, Jina Reader, Tavily, or Exa) to fetch content. The URL is only validated as syntactically valid via new URL() with no blocklist for private IP ranges, cloud metadata endpoints (e.g., 169.254.169.254), link-local addresses, or internal hostnames. An authenticated or locally-connected user can cause the server to fetch arbitrary internal URLs and have the response content returned, enabling read-access SSRF that can expose cloud metadata credentials, reach internal services, and bypass authentication on localhost endpoints.
- Product
- 9router
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Jul 23, 2026Victor SSRF vulnerability in Johnson Controls CCure 9000 and victor application server allows Server Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-21653 · Other software · Johnson Controls · reported by productsecurity@jci.comHigh 7.2
Victor SSRF vulnerability in Johnson Controls CCure 9000 and victor application server allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects CCure 9000 and victor application server: from 2.9 through 3.0.
- Product
- CCure 9000 and victor application server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.