Vulnerability database
Every flaw the U.S. government’s cybersecurity agency (CISA) has confirmed attackers are using, plus the new WordPress plugin and theme bugs published each day, sorted by what they mean for a small business. We refresh it twice a day. If you see something your website or office runs, tell us.
9,142 results · page 12 of 183
Sep 2, 2026A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin 798.v5cc688825312 and earlier allows attackers to delete shared lCVE-2026-84663 · Websites & servers · Jenkins Project · reported by jenkinsci-cert@googlegroups.comMedium 5.4
A cross-site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin 798.v5cc688825312 and earlier allows attackers to delete shared library caches.
- Product
- Jenkins Pipeline: Groovy Libraries Plugin
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 2, 2026Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Entity Share Websub allows Server Side Request Forgery.CVE-2026-73474 · Websites & servers · reported by mlhess@drupal.orgMedium 5.3
Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in Drupal Entity Share Websub allows Server Side Request Forgery. This issue affects Entity Share Websub versions: from 0.0.0 to 1.1.2.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 2, 2026Editor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Broken Link Checker <= 2.4.14 versions.CVE-2026-84772 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.5
Editor Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in Broken Link Checker <= 2.4.14 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.4.14
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.4.14. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mang Board WP <= 2.3.8 versions.CVE-2026-84770 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Mang Board WP <= 2.3.8 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.3.8
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.3.8. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simply Schedule Appointments <= 1.6.12.23 versions.CVE-2026-84764 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Simply Schedule Appointments <= 1.6.12.23 versions.
- Affected
- up to 1.6.12.23
- What to do
- Affects up to 1.6.12.23. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 2, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Activity Log <= 2.13.1 versions.CVE-2026-84759 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 7.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in Activity Log <= 2.13.1 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.13.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.13.1. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 2, 2026Grand Tour: Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF)CVE-2026-66652 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in ThemeGoods Grand Tour allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Grand Tour: from n/a through 5.5.1.
- Product
- Grand Tour
- Affected
- up to 5.5.1
- What to do
- Affects up to 5.5.1. Update Grand Tour to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Sep 1, 2026WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get_domain() and isSameDomain() functions that fail to properly vCVE-2026-84482 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
WWBN AVideo through commit 9c39d8c8 contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in the get_domain() and isSameDomain() functions that fail to properly validate referer origins. Attackers can forge requests from sibling subdomains or unparseable long-gTLD origins to perform administrative ObjectYPT writes including live server configuration changes.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances Server-Side Request Forgery VulnerabilityCVE-2026-83548 · Network & remote access · SonicWall · reported by PSIRT@sonicwall.comExploitedCritical 10
SonicWall SMA1000 Appliances contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to gain unauthorized access to sensitive functionality and perform unauthorized operations.
- Product
- SMA1000 Appliances
- On CISA’s list since
- Sep 2, 2026 (federal fix deadline Sep 5, 2026)
- What to do
- Attackers are using this now. Install SonicWall’s update today. If there is no update for your version, take the product off the internet or stop using it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordCISA catalogpsirt.global.sonicwall.comcisa.gov
Sep 1, 2026A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed remote code execution on the instance.CVE-2026-76851 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comHigh 7.7
A Server-Side Request Forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed remote code execution on the instance. Insufficient network isolation allowed malicious pre-receive hook code to impersonate an internal service and redirect trusted internal requests to a privileged service, leading to elevated code execution. Exploitation required pre-receive hook networking to be enabled and either site administrator privileges or write access to a repository containing a configured pre-receive hook. This vulnerability affected all versions of GitHub Enterprise Server prior to 3.22 and was fixed in versions 3.17.20, 3.18.14, 3.19.11, 3.20.7, and 3.21.5. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
- Product
- Enterprise Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddocs.github.comdocs.github.com
Sep 1, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API tCVE-2026-18730 · Other software · GitHub · reported by product-cna@github.comHigh 8.2
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability was identified in GitHub Enterprise Server that allowed an unauthenticated attacker to cause the Manage API to send crafted outbound requests to an attacker-controlled host. An unauthenticated endpoint parsed an attacker-supplied cluster configuration and issued gateway-to-agent requests whose HMAC authenticated only a timestamp, not the request path or body. An attacker positioned to intercept the outbound request could capture this token and replay it against privileged management agent endpoints. High-availability deployments were not affected due to a topology restriction. This vulnerability affected GitHub Enterprise Server releases in the 3.17, 3.18, 3.19, 3.20, and 3.21 series and was fixed in versions 3.17.21, 3.18.15, 3.19.12, 3.20.8, and 3.21.6. This vulnerability was reported via the GitHub Bug Bounty program.
- Product
- Enterprise Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recorddocs.github.comdocs.github.com
Sep 1, 2026A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX switches exposes some sessions to a lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection.CVE-2026-73780 · Other software · Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) · reported by security-alert@hpe.comHigh 8.3
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX switches exposes some sessions to a lack of Cross-Site Request Forgery (CSRF) protection. This could allow a remote unauthenticated attacker to execute arbitrary input against the affected interface if the attacker can convince an authenticated user of the interface to interact with a specially crafted URL.
- Product
- AOS-CX
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 1, 2026A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attCVE-2026-73757 · Other software · Hewlett Packard Enterprise (HPE) · reported by security-alert@hpe.comMedium 6.4
A vulnerability in the web-based management interface of AOS-CX could allow an authenticated remote attacker to conduct a server-side request forgery (SSRF) attack. A successful exploit allows an attacker to enumerate information about the internal structure of the AOS-CX host, leading to potential disclosure and limited modification of sensitive information.
- Product
- AOS-CX
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 1, 2026Wyoming before 1.10.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers with network access to force outbound connectioCVE-2026-8712 · Other software · OHF-Voice · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Wyoming before 1.10.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability that allows unauthenticated attackers with network access to force outbound connections to arbitrary targets by supplying a malicious `uri` query parameter to the HTTP API. Attackers can pass arbitrary `tcp://` or `unix://` URIs to affected endpoints including /api/info, /api/speech-to-text, and /api/text-to-speech to override the server-configured backend and redirect connections to attacker-chosen hosts.
- Product
- wyoming
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd.CVE-2026-18780 · Other software · TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. · reported by iletisim@usom.gov.trHigh 7.1
Cross-Site request forgery (CSRF) vulnerability in TMT Machine Industry and Trade Ltd. Co. Talassoft Industrial Management Software allows Cross Site Request Forgery. This issue affects Talassoft Industrial Management Software: from V.4 before V.16.
- Product
- Talassoft Industrial Management Software
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before 1.16.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the APICall feature.CVE-2026-84199 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Kyverno before 1.16.2 contains a server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in the APICall feature. The URL field in a Policy's ServiceCall configuration is not validated, so a user with namespace-level Policy creation permissions can direct Kyverno to make HTTP requests to arbitrary internal resources (e.g., cloud metadata endpoints such as 169.254.169.254 or other tenants' resources). Because Kyverno executes these requests using its cluster-wide high-privilege ServiceAccount (a Confused Deputy problem), the responses—potentially including other tenants' secrets and cloud IAM credentials—are returned in the PolicyReport and can be read by the attacker, breaking multi-tenant isolation.
- Product
- kyverno
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before 1.18.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in apiCall.service.url that allows authenticated users to send arbitrary HTTP requestCVE-2026-84196 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Kyverno before 1.18.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in apiCall.service.url that allows authenticated users to send arbitrary HTTP requests by injecting user-controlled input through variable substitution. Attackers can target internal services, cloud metadata endpoints, and loopback addresses, with response data reflected in admission error messages enabling non-blind data exfiltration.
- Product
- kyverno
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/API/set.json.php that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions by crafting GET reCVE-2026-83595 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.2
AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/API/set.json.php that allows attackers to perform state-changing actions by crafting GET requests that bypass CSRF protection. Attackers can navigate a victim's browser to a malicious URL with API parameters to delete videos, deactivate accounts, or modify playlists without user interaction.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Sep 1, 2026Kyverno before v1.13.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via its Service Call functionality.CVE-2025-15613 · Other software · kyverno · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
Kyverno before v1.13.4 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF) via its Service Call functionality. An attacker with permission to create Kyverno (Cluster)Policies can specify an external URL in a policy's apiCall/service configuration; although Service Call is documented for in-cluster services, it also resolves external addresses, allowing requests to an attacker-controlled server. Because policy context data (including contents of Kubernetes resources such as secrets) is sent in these requests, an attacker can exfiltrate sensitive cluster data.
- Product
- kyverno
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 31, 2026Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in MapSVG <= 8.15.0 versions.CVE-2026-82852 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackMedium 5.4
Unauthenticated Server Side Request Forgery (SSRF) in MapSVG <= 8.15.0 versions.
- Affected
- up to 8.15.0
- What to do
- Affects up to 8.15.0. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 31, 2026Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the /har/test endpoint in QD 20220208 through 20250803.CVE-2026-51152 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
Server-side request forgery (SSRF) in the /har/test endpoint in QD 20220208 through 20250803. Fetcher.build_request() in libs/fetcher.py constructs an httpclient.HTTPRequest from user-supplied JSON without validating URL scheme, host, or IP range. The /har/test handler does not require authentication, enabling unauthenticated remote attackers to force the QD server to send arbitrary HTTP requests to internal network resources and cloud metadata endpoints. validate_cert is set to False, disabling TLS verification.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgist.github.comqd-today.github.io
Aug 31, 2026ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy juCVE-2026-71378 · Websites & servers · Apache Software Foundation · reported by security@apache.orgMedium 4.6
ResourceIsolationRequestCycleListener protects a Wicket application against cross-site request forgery by rejecting requests that a resource isolation policy judges to come from another origin. Its default policy, FetchMetadataResourceIsolationPolicy, was derived from a reference implementation written to guard static resources, and it inherited two allowances that are unsafe when the thing being guarded is an action on a page: * Every "simple top-level navigation" was allowed. Any GET request carrying Sec-Fetch-Mode: navigate whose Sec-Fetch-Dest was neither object nor embed was allowed, whatever Sec-Fetch-Site said — including cross-site. Wicket invokes component listeners (Link.onClick(), form submits, behaviour callbacks) through ordinary GET navigations, so a page under an attacker's control could navigate the victim's browser to a listener URL and have that listener run inside the victim's authenticated session. Browsers send SameSite=Lax cookies — the effective default when no SameSite attribute is set — on cross-site top-level GET navigations, so the victim's session cookie accompanied the request. * Sec-Fetch-Site: same-site was allowed unconditionally. That value me
- Product
- Apache Wicket
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordlists.apache.orgopenwall.com
Aug 31, 2026@pdfme/common before 5.5.10 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the getB64BasePdf function that fetches arbitrary URLs without validation whCVE-2026-82866 · Other software · pdfme · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.9
@pdfme/common before 5.5.10 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the getB64BasePdf function that fetches arbitrary URLs without validation when basePdf is attacker-controlled. Attackers who control the basePdf template field can force servers or clients to make requests to internal endpoints, enabling metadata exfiltration, network reconnaissance, and blind request forgery attacks.
- Product
- common
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026A vulnerability was found in Forgejo up to 15.0.4.CVE-2026-82556 · Other software · reported by VulDBLow 2.1
A vulnerability was found in Forgejo up to 15.0.4. This issue affects the function net.LookupIP of the file services/migrations/allowlist/is_migrate_allowed.go of the component Repository Migration Handler. Performing a manipulation results in server-side request forgery. The attack can be initiated remotely. The exploit has been made public and could be used. The patch is named b313bb83f5ff22bcc0378e0e0ca7bbd58303f168. It is recommended to apply a patch to fix this issue. The project maintainer explains: "I don't intend to backport this to v15 or v16 as it is a breaking change."
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordcodeberg.orgcodeberg.org
Aug 30, 2026WWBN AVideo contains a server-side request forgery filter bypass vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to normalize NAT64 addresses written in CVE-2026-82648 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
WWBN AVideo contains a server-side request forgery filter bypass vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to normalize NAT64 addresses written in hexadecimal form. Attackers can bypass SSRF protections by supplying hex-encoded NAT64 addresses like 64:ff9b::a9fe:a9fe to reach cloud metadata services and loopback interfaces.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026WWBN AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in sendEmail.json.php that allows authenticated administrators to send mail from the site's contCVE-2026-82647 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.3
WWBN AVideo contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in sendEmail.json.php that allows authenticated administrators to send mail from the site's contact address by bypassing origin checks and captcha validation. Attackers can craft a malicious web page that, when visited by an authenticated admin, sends emails with attacker-controlled subject and body to arbitrary recipients, passing SPF/DKIM/DMARC validation for phishing and brand impersonation attacks.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 30, 2026jina-ai reader disables its private-address guard outside Google Cloud deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery.CVE-2026-82638 · Other software · jina-ai · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
jina-ai reader disables its private-address guard outside Google Cloud deployments, allowing unauthenticated attackers to perform server-side request forgery. Attackers can supply publicly resolvable hostnames mapping to private addresses to retrieve cloud metadata and internal service content.
- Product
- reader
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 29, 2026Rodauth before 2.47.0 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass vulnerability in the JSON request content type validation.CVE-2026-82468 · Other software · jeremyevans · reported by VulnCheckMedium 4.9
Rodauth before 2.47.0 contains a cross-site request forgery protection bypass vulnerability in the JSON request content type validation. Attackers can craft cross-origin form posts with content types containing application/json substrings to bypass CSRF token validation and force victims to authenticate to attacker-controlled accounts.
- Product
- rodauth
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF).CVE-2026-18545 · Other software · IBM · reported by psirt@us.ibm.comMedium 4.3
IBM Langflow OSS 1.0.0 through 1.11.1 is vulnerable to server-side request forgery (SSRF). This may allow an authenticated attacker to send unauthorized requests from the system, potentially leading to network enumeration or facilitating other attacks.
- Product
- Langflow OSS
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication CVE-2026-82285 · Other software · dataelement · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.8
bisheng through 2.6.0-fix2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/v1/workflow/report/callback endpoint that lacks authentication and applies no URL scheme restrictions or host filtering. Unauthenticated attackers can supply arbitrary URLs to enumerate internal network services and cloud metadata endpoints, then retrieve captured responses from object storage using caller-supplied object names.
- Product
- bisheng
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware.CVE-2026-82270 · Other software · Portkey-AI · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Portkey AI Gateway through 1.15.2 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the /v1/proxy/* route that lacks requestValidator middleware. Attackers can set the x-portkey-custom-host header to internal addresses and forward requests with Authorization headers to reach internal services and exfiltrate provider API keys.
- Product
- gateway
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scCVE-2026-82268 · Other software · QwenLM · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.7
Qwen-Agent through 0.0.34 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the document parsing path that treats caller-supplied paths as URLs without scheme restriction or host validation. Attackers can reach the unauthenticated Gradio interface to make the server issue HTTP requests to arbitrary internal addresses including metadata services and read retrieved content through parsed document output.
- Product
- Qwen-Agent
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL paraCVE-2026-82263 · Other software · logto-io · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the OIDC SSO connector creation endpoint that fails to validate the issuer URL parameter. Tenant administrators with Management API credentials can supply arbitrary internal URLs to trigger HTTP GET requests to private network services, with response content returned in API responses.
- Product
- logto
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host valiCVE-2026-82262 · Other software · logto-io · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.2
Logto through 1.42.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the POST /api/hooks/:id/test endpoint that accepts arbitrary URLs without host validation. Tenant administrators with Management API tokens can make the server issue HTTP POST requests to internal URLs and retrieve response bodies from services on the private network.
- Product
- logto
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 28, 2026Everest Forms: Server-Side Request ForgeryCVE-2026-5096 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by WordfenceMedium 5.3
The Everest Forms plugin for WordPress is vulnerable to Server-Side Request Forgery in all versions up to, and including, 3.4.4. This is due to the `load_previous_field_value()` method in `class-evf-form-task.php` accepting arbitrary URL values from `$_POST` data for upload fields without domain restriction, which are then passed to `wp_remote_head()` in the `get_local_file_size()` method of `class-evf-form-fields-upload.php`. This makes it possible for unauthenticated attackers to force the WordPress server to make outbound HTTP HEAD requests to arbitrary URLs by submitting a form with an upload field containing a malicious URL while leaving a required field empty to trigger form re-rendering.
- Product
- Everest Forms
- Affected
- up to 3.4.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 3.4.4. Update Everest Forms to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordplugins.trac.wordpress.orgplugins.trac.wordpress.org
Aug 28, 2026Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs beforeCVE-2026-82246 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 7.1
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the query import endpoint that fails to validate user-supplied URLs before fetching content. Attackers can submit arbitrary URLs to retrieve responses from internal services including cloud metadata endpoints and other restricted network resources.
- Product
- server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply aCVE-2026-82243 · Other software · budibase · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.3
Budibase Server before 3.41.3 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the datasource verify endpoint that allows builder-level users to supply arbitrary URLs without SSRF validation. Attackers can exploit this to leak internal CouchDB credentials by making requests to attacker-controlled servers, gaining full database access in cloud deployments.
- Product
- server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026SiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution onlyCVE-2026-82234 · Other software · siyuan-note · reported by VulnCheckHigh 8.4
SiYuan versions before v3.8.1 contain a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the http_request and web_fetch agent tools that perform DNS resolution only at guard time without validating the connect-time resolution. Attackers can use DNS rebinding to answer the guard resolution with a public IP and the connect resolution with a private or metadata IP, bypassing the SSRF defense to access cloud instance metadata and internal services.
- Product
- siyuan
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026WWBN AVideo through 30.0 (and master up to commit 4cb576e) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/myLiveControls.save.json.php.CVE-2026-81733 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 5.1
WWBN AVideo through 30.0 (and master up to commit 4cb576e) contains a cross-site request forgery vulnerability in plugin/Live/myLiveControls.save.json.php. The endpoint only checks that a user is logged in and processes customUrl, customMessage, and autoRedirect parameters from $_REQUEST via a GET request without enforcing a CSRF token or origin check. An attacker who lures a logged-in streamer to a malicious page can silently change the live-channel viewer-redirect settings (persisted in users.externalOptions), causing viewers to be redirected to a phishing site or shown a spoofed message.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 28, 2026A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitivCVE-2026-9491 · Network & remote access · Synology · reported by security@synology.comMedium 4.3
A server-ide request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability in webhook in Synology Chat Server before 2.4.5-22148 allows remote authenticated users to obtain non-sensitive information.
- Product
- Synology Chat Server
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to CVE-2026-78500 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A blind server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Database Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension FTP Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate eCVE-2026-78499 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension FTP Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Email Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerateCVE-2026-78498 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.1
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Email Server Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker CVE-2026-78495 · Network & remote access · WatchGuard · reported by 5d1c2695-1a31-4499-88ae-e847036fd7e3Medium 5.3
A server-side request forgery (SSRF) vulnerability WatchGuard Dimension Remote Backup Connection Test configuration allows an authenticated privileged attacker to enumerate exposed network services on adjacent network systems.
- Product
- Dimension
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Aug 27, 2026openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to sanitize the email field of imported identity documents, allowing attackers to inject ANSI escape sequences that forge theCVE-2026-81707 · Other software · jahlives · reported by VulnCheckCritical 9.3
openssl_encrypt before 1.4.9 fails to sanitize the email field of imported identity documents, allowing attackers to inject ANSI escape sequences that forge the fingerprint verification line displayed to users. Attackers can deliver a crafted identity bundle through normal contact-exchange flows or keyserver responses to manipulate terminal output and display a fraudulent fingerprint, bypassing the out-of-band verification mechanism that protects against key substitution attacks.
- Product
- openssl_encrypt
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 27, 2026AVideo before 24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to extract embedded IPv4 addresses from NAT64, CVE-2026-81678 · Other software · WWBN · reported by VulnCheckMedium 6.9
AVideo before 24.0 contains a server-side request forgery vulnerability in the isSSRFSafeURL function that fails to extract embedded IPv4 addresses from NAT64, 6to4, and Teredo IPv6 transition address formats. Unauthenticated attackers can bypass SSRF protections via the LiveLinks proxy endpoint to reach internal services and cloud metadata endpoints by encoding private IPv4 targets in transition address formats.
- Product
- AVideo
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordgithub.comvulncheck.com
Aug 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FluentBooking Pro <= 2.2.4 versions.CVE-2026-81273 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.1
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in FluentBooking Pro <= 2.2.4 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.2.4
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.2.4. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 27, 2026Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.176 versions.CVE-2026-81271 · WordPress plugins & themes · reported by PatchstackHigh 8.8
Unauthenticated Cross Site Request Forgery (CSRF) in GeoDirectory <= 2.8.176 versions.
- Affected
- up to 2.8.176
- What to do
- Affects up to 2.8.176. Update the plugin to the newest version and check its changelog mentions this fix; if there isn’t one yet, deactivate it until there is.
Aug 27, 2026Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user wCVE-2026-77035 · Websites & servers · reported by security@joomla.orgMedium 5.1
Joomla Extension - joomlaeventmanager.net - Cross-user event and venue takeover through forged form fields in Joomla Event Manager < 5.0.1 - A registered user with edit-own rights (the eventowner=1 setting or core.edit.own) can POST another user's record id together with their own id as created_by and take over that record.
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Full record and what to do →NVD recordjoomlaeventmanager.net
Aug 26, 2026The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgeCVE-2026-75340 · Other software · reported by MITRECritical 9.1
The device metadata import interface /device/instance/{productId}/property-metadata/import of jetlinks community 2.11 is vulnerable to Server-side request forgery (SSRF).
- What to do
- Apply the vendor’s update. The NVD record links to the advisory.
Where this comes from: the exploited list is CISA’s Known Exploited Vulnerabilities catalog. Everything else is the whole National Vulnerability Database, where each record is published by the team that found the bug (Wordfence, Patchstack, WPScan, the vendors themselves and others); we show who. Exploit odds are FIRST’s EPSS, updated daily. Titles and categories are ours, so check the linked record before acting on a detail. For a write-up of the big ones, see our advisories. Every vendor, and every WordPress plugin and theme with a recorded flaw, also has its own page. All of it is free to reuse as JSON, CSV or RSS.
Weekly security brief
The flaws that hit local websites, every Friday.
One short email: what got exploited this week, which WordPress plugins broke, and what to check. Unsubscribe in one click.
Tell us what you're building.
A website, your marketing, a security check, an app, or the thing you've been running out of a spreadsheet for three years. A few lines is plenty.
Not ready to talk yet? Run the free website check and see what Google sees.